That must be it...case closed! you solved it franky .
Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)
- Thread starter lir2016
- Start date
Your article confirms that Kirk said the Civil Rights Act was a mistake.Did Charlie Kirk Say the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Was a Mistake? — Anthony Delgado
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is one of the most important laws in American history, dismantling segregation and prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, and national origin. Because of its moral and historical weight, any critique of the Act draws immediate attention. So,www.anthonydelgado.net
Its just MAGA trying to argue why killing civil rights is really a great idea.
You're doing as well for Kirk as this guy.
So this is why one side is losing because they never give a full picture. And people are beginning to wake up to that and doing their own DD.
Charlie Kirk once said passing the Civil Rights Act was a 'huge mistake'
The conservative activist's quote about the landmark legislation circulated online after he was fatally shot in September 2025.www.snopes.com
He has explained what he meant on several different debates on campus, on his podcast, etc. Just one example below:
What Charlie Kirk actually said about the civil rights act.
Bekijk je favoriete video's, luister naar de muziek die je leuk vindt, upload originele content en deel alles met vrienden, familie en anderen op YouTube.
www.youtube.com
The left never provides the entire picture and just relies on a 10 sec soundbyte or "misquoting" someone they want to defame. Its a carefully curated narrative.Did Charlie Kirk Say the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Was a Mistake? — Anthony Delgado
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is one of the most important laws in American history, dismantling segregation and prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, and national origin. Because of its moral and historical weight, any critique of the Act draws immediate attention. So,
My posting was the truth...Doesn't matter where it lies. Nobody is absolutely right about every single thing they say.
This is a concept which you and your handlers will never grasp.
You really have a hard time putting pieces together. The argument Kirk makes is the intent was good and noble, the laws that were written were way to broad and allowed for the nobility of the act to be undermined.
But the left wing curated narrative continues to push that Kirk hates all blacks/minorities/women/gays/etc. The problem with the brain rot that the left has capitalized for years among their base is that people don't bother to fact check the headline anymore.
For years the maple MAGA here have also declared that trump isn't racist, a conman and a pedo.
If you want to add to that team and say Kirk wasn't a white nationalist, that's your call.
This isn't about whether Kirk's claim about the Civil Rights Act was right or wrong.
This is about pointing out that it fits with the rest of what he posted as being racist.
We still have people who think trump isn't racist and a rapist here too.
I was listening to Steven Crowder on Piers last night...He's hyperbolic but makes some good points..Especially on how all theses political violence stats are measured.
On another note I don't see any leftists on here sticking up for Pam Bondi assertion that she wants to go after people engaging in hate speech...Republican podcasters want her to step down immediately. They can see the damage that imposing hate speech laws can have.
Like I said, you can call it out or you can defend his racism.
You can interpret it as you like, just as lots of people interpret trump and think he's smart and honest.
That comment fits a pattern.
Pro Hamas students locking up a library isn't, this is where you draw the line? it's making you upset again...
We know you won't draw the line at pedos, rapists or genocide.
Just people who want to stop that shite.
Lefties always blow their wad too early...it's called "premature evaluation"...So this is why one side is losing because they never give a full picture. And people are beginning to wake up to that and doing their own DD.
He has explained what he meant on several different debates on campus, on his podcast, etc. Just one example below:
What Charlie Kirk actually said about the civil rights act.
Bekijk je favoriete video's, luister naar de muziek die je leuk vindt, upload originele content en deel alles met vrienden, familie en anderen op YouTube.
except that didn't happen...Kimmel wasnt silenced / jailed...Funny how every accusation you make...Hamas and Iran actually are the ones doing what you hope Trump is doing...like every marxist..."confuse your opposition and accuse them of what you're doing while doing it"...how fascist of you
Students behaving unruly is a disciplinary issue.
The state promoting a vile grifter as a national hero is cultural degradation.
This is Handmaid's Tale level BS.
Not if they're financed - they're what exactly what you're trying to define as grifters.
As I said. Watch what happens with the 2nd. The minute they start discussing that, especially if a few more shootings occur, then it's going to get mighty ugly.
