What a snappy reply. I've been wounded.You really shouldn't drink so much bleach.
Honest question. Do you regard Greta as being smarter than you?
What a snappy reply. I've been wounded.You really shouldn't drink so much bleach.
Ignore this advice and exercise your personal freedom!You really shouldn't drink so much bleach.
You haven't experienced the ultimate thrill until your poop comes out sparkling white and germ and virus free.Ignore this advice and exercise your personal freedom!
Greta is clearly smarter than you and doesn't suffer from Dunning Kruger effect.What a snappy reply. I've been wounded.
Honest question. Do you regard Greta as being smarter than you?
According to you in other posts, plagues have been cured by prayer. Maybe she prayed and got cured.Greta did tweet that she had covid but she had recovered. She also said she never got tested which implies she never saw a doctor. She must have cured herself.
Um, you are anti-science and you posted extensively in the thread idolozing Moore.Putting aside your careless characterization of the people who believe in sound energy policies as being somehow "anti-science," I agree with much of what you have written here -- until you get to the part about people trying to promote Moore as "an expert."
....
In all fairness, I think it's safe to assume that Greta knows as much about the virus as she does about climate science.Which scientists is Greta referring to? The ones that said that the corona virus was nothing to worry about but then it was a pandemic and we should all be afraid or that said to not wear masks then said to wear masks etc. But Greta is a self-diagnosed covid-19 survivor so she must know what she is talking about.
Nice deflection of the question. Of course I didn't expect a straight answer from you. Believe what you want about my intelligence but I don't post on a message 20 times a day every day for the past 5 years like you do. Seems like you are on the spectrum just like Greta.Greta is clearly smarter than you and doesn't suffer from Dunning Kruger effect.
I expect she's a smart kid, smart enough to understand bullshit propaganda from science.
Clearly you can't.
What would be wrong with that if that's what happened?According to you in other posts, plagues have been cured by prayer. Maybe she prayed and got cured.
A weak man will grab a woman's pussy (well, dozens of women's pussies), knowing he can get away with it because he's rich and can afford the legal consequences.Weak men pick on young girls.
Environmental heroes such as James Hansen and Michael Shellenberger hold the same view as me when it comes to the fantasy of an energy future powered by wind and solar.Um, you are anti-science and you posted extensively in the thread idolozing Moore.
I love how the recommendation that countries should adopt sound energy policies is characterized as an "agenda."So you're pushing a film from a source you don't think is trustworthy because it suits your own agenda.
That qualifies as backing propaganda.
Actually, Greta's position does argue for a return to the Victorian era. Let's review her position.Straw man argument.
Nobody is arguing for the return of the Victorian era.
Solar and wind power doesn't mean you have to use a horse and carriage.
Glad to hear that you back Hansen's argument that a carbon tax is the best policy.Environmental heroes such as James Hansen and Michael Shellenberger hold the same view as me when it comes to the fantasy of an energy future powered by wind and solar.
Does that mean they are also "anti-science"?
You're lying about her positions again.Actually, Greta's position does argue for a return to the Victorian era. Let's review her position.
Given the technology that exists today, it is impossible to create a future where energy is supplied primarily from wind and solar power. Having ruled those sources out as major suppliers, let's look at Greta's take on other sources:
- She opposes coal.
- She opposes oil.
- She opposes natural gas.
- She opposes nuclear power.
In the absence of coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear power and wind and solar, what's left? There are hydroelectric dams but that's not enough to power modern society and important services such as hospitals.
This is not a straw man argument. Having ruled out most sources (and with reality having ruled out wind and solar for her), what Greta champions ultimately is a return to the Victorian era.
She has been quite clear -- she thinks the advances made since the Industrial Revolution have destroyed the future for young bedwetters like her.
The fact that she idealizes the world that existed before the Industrial Revolution speaks to the fact she really doesn't know much about science or history.
That's a straw man argument, by definition."Personally I am against nuclear power, but according to the IPCC [the United Nations Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change], it can be a small part of a very big new carbon free energy solution, especially in countries and areas that lack the possibility of a full scale renewable energy supply - even though it's extremely dangerous, expensive and time consuming. But let’s leave that debate until we start looking at the full picture." ---Greta Thunberg, founder, Youth Climate Strike