No sir. What you are referring to was the vet taking liberties while Blackcrack was under anestaesia.The doctors convinced Blackmock that the flu shot had to be taken in the rectum????
I've felt fluish before after getting the flu shot and basically slept it off the evening of the day I got inoculated. Last November, I didn't feel anything. To me, if I feel sluggish on the day or have a sore arm, that's the only pain for the longer term gain.Almost anything is possible, but unlikely. Remember about 1/3 of those who get the flu don't show symptoms.
Is Anestaesia the name of his vet?No sir. What you are referring to was the vet taking liberties while Blackcrack was under anestaesia.
That's the hypocrisy of RM's point, as he allows other vaccines to be given to his children, but not the flu vaccine. every years, there are 5 million diagnosis of influenza, the ons they can see the symptoms, and 250-500,000 deaths, 300,000 in S/E Asia and Africa with no major programs to speak of. That with the maybe billion+ doses of inoculations done worldwide. Imagine what would happen if the inoculation didn't get out there.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/08/05/swine.flu.deaths/
It's not always about the money.
He posted earlier that it's the flu vaccines that he puts his nose up at and before he posts and says he didn't say that, it wasn't a quote. He just says the flu isn't the horror show some are trying to make it out to be. Imagine if the 50 million or so citizens in the US and nearly 7 million in Canada who got inoculated in 2009 didn't do so, how much more different the result would have been.
Thanks for chiming in and saying (way better than I could, BTW) what I've been trying to...
Internet Geniuses like Fuji and Blackrock always take peoples words, twist them around, and use them to say something completely different in order to make an (often irrelevant) point. (Case in point: I say something negative about a flu shot, and suddenly they are talking about small pox, measels, Hepatitis etc. :crazy
As for their "data" on mortality rates due to "the flu", you are correct in saying is highly subjective... because most of those deaths are from people with predisposed health issues.
Damn right. They should have gotten the flu shot in the fall like rational people.yep - so as the "pandemic begins" oooo ahhh o noees....it makes a tonne of sense for those folks in edmonton to line up, only actually have any antibodies 3 weeks later
Oh yea, i forgot, take it just in case !
If you were scientifically literate, you would know that the words 'science' and 'certainty' rarely go together. I'd accept 'a high statistical probability'.It is a certainty that ...
It's possible that the earth will be destroyed first, or that we well find a cure that eradicates all flu. Short of those sorts of things, the odds of it becoming human transferable at some point are statistically indistinguishable from 100 percent.If you were scientifically literate, you would know that the words 'science' and 'certainty' rarely go together. I'd accept 'a high statistical probability'.
It's like an insurance policy. What if a condom breaks?
Basically, if there is no downside to being inoculated for AIDS, why wouldn't you do it, particularly if you're single, and especially if you're a hobbyist?
As soon as there's a vaccine for Hep C, I'll get it. Why not?
If there is too much draft, maybeIs it possible that chimneys can get the flu?
Ssshhhh, Blackcrack may get on fire over this.Grate answer.