Toronto Girlfriends

Girls Do Porn Cameraman Pleads Guilty, Admits to Lying to Women

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,142
104,044
113
With the whole nonsense of positive consent I doubt anyone alive has not raped a woman

Things like persistence to bed someone or lying about your intentions are now bad
And lets not even get into things like alcohol (clubs are rape factories today lol)
Holy fuck! Just when I thought that I had read everything on TERB.
🤮
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: poker and squeezer

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,142
104,044
113
As an update: The guy was just sentenced to 20 years in prison. One partner is on trial soon. The other partner is still at large with a $50K reward.

The guy looks young... Like he came up with a really stupid/successful way to nail chicks after he just turned 18, yet was too dumb to write legit contracts (that the women probably wouldn't have read properly).
Only in the US. 20 years is a helluva hit.
 

curr3n_c1000

I do all my own stunts
Dec 20, 2014
4,034
2,187
113
With the whole nonsense of positive consent I doubt anyone alive has not raped a woman

Things like persistence to bed someone or lying about your intentions are now bad
And lets not even get into things like alcohol (clubs are rape factories today lol)
And that's why we have laws to protect populations from people like you.

You're psychotic and anyone that comes in contact with you is at danger.
 
Last edited:

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,324
17,374
113
Which is irrelevant

Go sell your home
One of the things it says right in the contract is oral claims are irrelevant and if any disagreement between what Realtor tells you and written contract says the contract is the only thing that matters

You see how many complains get filed every year
Vast majority of complainers get nothing, even when Realtor straight up lies to them

I never understood logic of signing a paper contract then asking joe blow to explain it
Ask a lawyer if words are too big for you
But you know, girls were making porn so I doubt much upstairs anyhow
See, I was right again! You are a salesman, a crooked and very poor salesman but nonetheless a salesman.

With the whole nonsense of positive consent I doubt anyone alive has not raped a woman

Things like persistence to bed someone or lying about your intentions are now bad
And lets not even get into things like alcohol (clubs are rape factories today lol)
See, I was right again! You are a poor excuse for a human as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,257
5,320
113
Or like suing McDonalds for spilling hot coffee on yourself.

One has to take some responsibility for signing a contract they didn't read or understand and not just belive whoever is summing it up for them.
I read early on some of the girls said they got paid with a wad of cash on their way out only to discover it was stacked with one dollar bills stuffed in middle.
That's sleazy ,dirty and criminal. At least pay them the agreed amount .
Not to detail this discussion too much, but this famous coffee story is BS. McDonald's was sued because the kept the coffee super-hot (hotter than required) so they could keep it longer and not waste any. The elderly lady only asked them to pay her medical bills, which were something like $50K, but the company refused. So, her lawyer found numerous other victims who were scalded by this coffee and Mcdonald's crappy cups. Bottom line, this lawsuit was painted as something to show how the courts need tort reform, when in actuality, it shows the cruelty and what not of corporate America. Check it out:


Another thing these assholes did was not allow the girls to back out. They got them drunk or stoned, and threatened them with leaving them stranded in a city they were not familiar with, and knew nobody. These guys deserved to go to prison.
 

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,044
731
113
west gta
You do know that Canada has positive consent as its standard and has had it for decades now, right?
When I was younger it was also legal to sleep with a 12 year old
That would be another reason why so many people are "rapists"
Esp with the 16+ crowds

Most of these new laws came into force in past 20 years
Doesn't change the fact they are a steaming pile of horse nonsense
 
Last edited:

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,044
731
113
west gta
Not to detail this discussion too much, but this famous coffee story is BS. McDonald's was sued because the kept the coffee super-hot (hotter than required)
McD required franchises to serve at 180+ F
(82+ C)

They were sued because the argument was at that temp it was not fit for human consumption

Her reward money for being stupid was also reduced by judge to far less than 1 million; papers only crow about 1 million award because it sounds large
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,142
104,044
113
When I was younger it was also legal to sleep with a 12 year old
That would be another reason why so many people are "rapists"
Esp with the 16+ crowds

Most of these new laws came into force in past 20 years
Doesn't change the fact they are a steaming pile of horse nonsense
When was it - supposedly - legal for an adult to sleep with a 12 year old in Canada?
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
15,881
7,664
113
there's a right way to do porn and then there's the wrong way...it's a big industry and there will always be people watching...they were trying to do a niche of random girls but use shady ways to do it. I mean, everything video taped should have release forms before publishing. What were they thinking is going to happen?
 

curr3n_c1000

I do all my own stunts
Dec 20, 2014
4,034
2,187
113

Uncharted

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2013
1,042
1,012
113
Plus, they rushed the girls to sign them and often got
them drunk/high beforehand.
I'm a little confused by this defence.

So if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to sign a contract, they're legally considered not to be capable of making that decision.
And if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to give consent, they're legally considered not to be capable of making that decision.

But, if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to start a fight with someone, they are legally considered to be capable of making that decision.
And if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to drive a vehicle, they are legally considered to be capable of making that decision.

So, I'm confused. Are you legally capable of making decisions and being held responsible for them when you're intoxicated or not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scholar

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,044
731
113
west gta
But it was 14 years then; not 12 years.
Its not clear on Wiki but there was a clause if you knew them and were only 5 years apart before became adult
(eg if a 17 year old went with a 12 year old, when 17 turned 18 its cool despite being adult)

There also was a marriage clause which has since been struck from books (this would only effect those born pre 60s but you see how many old farmers married young (often as young as 12) year old girls)
 

Goodoer

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2004
3,106
1,995
113
GTA & Thereabouts...
I'm a little confused by this defence.

So if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to sign a contract, they're legally considered not to be capable of making that decision.
And if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to give consent, they're legally considered not to be capable of making that decision.

But, if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to start a fight with someone, they are legally considered to be capable of making that decision.
And if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to drive a vehicle, they are legally considered to be capable of making that decision.

So, I'm confused. Are you legally capable of making decisions and being held responsible for them when you're intoxicated or not?
I’ve had this same argument myself about drunk driving. The minute you drink, you're affected. Need a lawyer to explain why.
 
Last edited:

Male4Strapon

Well-known member
Mar 16, 2021
1,477
1,659
113
These guys should rot in hell for this but having said that, anything you do in front of a camera, there is always the risk of it being shared. Even if unintentionally.
With everything being digital, it could just as easily have been a situation where the owner of the video could have been hacked and the content released that way.
It’s disturbing that these girls could be so naive and sickening that these guys exploited this.
 
H

hipjdog

I'm a little confused by this defence.

So if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to sign a contract, they're legally considered not to be capable of making that decision.
And if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to give consent, they're legally considered not to be capable of making that decision.

But, if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to start a fight with someone, they are legally considered to be capable of making that decision.
And if a person is intoxicated, and makes the decision to drive a vehicle, they are legally considered to be capable of making that decision.

So, I'm confused. Are you legally capable of making decisions and being held responsible for them when you're intoxicated or not?
These are very good points. If you're consenting to getting intoxicated then perhaps you are consenting to being accountable for the
decisions you make afterward.
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
17,556
17,892
113
Canada
This could be the start to ending porn. With Mormon republicans taking over congress and the senate.
 
Toronto Escorts