Discreet Dolls

Gizzlaine Maxwell to be pardoned.

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
36,249
71,659
113
The facts are that both Epstein, Maxwell and her father the late Robert Maxwell all did work for the Mossad at one time.
I'm not sure those are facts that have been established, but am willing to look at evidence.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
36,249
71,659
113
But Ghislaine Maxwell is in prison for trafficking minors.
Among other things.

Are you trying to argue that she did that alone and that Epstein wasn't involved?
No. She was specifically charged and convicted for acts with Epstein.
What has happened to your reading skills?

I was pointing out that nottyboi's argument about age of consent didn't hold up since the island wasn' t the location.
Indeed, Maxwell's convictions involve Florida, New York, and New Mexico.

Even if we did say only the island matters, the girls involved were younger than the age of consent there, too.

What about the charges of rape of a 13 year old by Epstein and trump, though they managed to get those charges dropped later?
I mentioned it in my response to nottyboi.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,892
17,970
113
Epstein‘s religion or there lack of was not mentioned in this post until you mentioned it and you are being conveniently
obtuse for whatever reasons !

The facts are that both Epstein, Maxwell and her father the late Robert Maxwell all did work for the Mossad at one time. Obviously the Mossad is a very clever machine wouldn’t say ?
Israel is very adept at surviving and is constantly taking steps to ensure their survival.. It was one hell to form the state of Israel in the first place .
Well, it must be true because Tucker Carlson says so. LMAO

IT'S NONSENSE AND BULLSHIT but hey, everyone loves a Tucker story.


 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
99,049
26,666
113
Well, it must be true because Tucker Carlson says so. LMAO

IT'S NONSENSE AND BULLSHIT but hey, everyone loves a Tucker story.


And you believe Bennett?
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
36,249
71,659
113
All bawdy houses have alternate functions but they are still places where paid for debauchery takes place.
The island existed before Epstein and continues to exist.
I have lived in residences where paid-for debauchery took place.
I still wouldn't say every single person who visited more than once should be suspected of engaging in that debauchery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richaceg

lomotil

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2004
6,834
1,670
113
Oblivion
Well, it must be true because Tucker Carlson says so. LMAO

IT'S NONSENSE AND BULLSHIT but hey, everyone loves a Tucker story.


Tucker Carlson is an abomination and not a credible source on many issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
16,772
8,223
113
If Ghislaine Maxwell were to receive a pardon, it would send public trust in Donald Trump, already at a historically low point plummeting even further. Such a move would not only outrage much of the American public but also raise serious questions about his motives. It would be widely interpreted as a desperate attempt to prevent Maxwell from testifying or revealing potentially damaging information about him. Maxwell may be Epsteined to keep her off television, away from book deals, and out of the public eye, burying whatever truths she might otherwise disclose.
Lol... public trust on Trump is on a record high..... your PTDS is slipping out...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
36,249
71,659
113
Perhaps its time for some research.
(they say that of the 200 phones they tracked trump didn't visit after 2008 and Epstein's first trial)

That's a fun data set they grabbed.
They don't really have evidence Trump didn't visit after 2008 from that phone data, though, since it only seems to start in 2016.

The phone traffic also doesn't seem to really settle the question of whether or not the island's primary role is as a bawdy house.
From what I recall, it was still considered Epstein's primary residence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
16,772
8,223
113
Evidence, please.

Also, do you mean a record high for Trump?
Or a record high for Presidents?
Something else?
My bad...for Trump. he's beating his approval rating from his first term by double...according to CNN.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
36,249
71,659
113
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
8,199
2,639
113
I have lived in residences where paid-for debauchery took place.
I still wouldn't say every single person who visited more than once should be suspected of engaging in that debauchery.
Were you 18? Because anything younger would just be wrong.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
8,199
2,639
113
Does anyone really believe anything will come of this other than more innuendo?

We all know important and powerful men visited the island and were friendly with Epstein. I don't think we will ever find any conclusive evidence that any of these men Trump, Clinton, etc. slept with underage girls. Do you think Epstein had a list of powerful men, their sex acts and the age of the women in a drawer?

The clamoring for more and more information from the DOJ likely conflicts with accusations lacking real evidence.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
8,199
2,639
113
For those who think they are closing in on Trump with the Epstein files, I'm going with the theory that Merrick Garland would not have sat on evidence that implicates Trump for four years.

Now if you think that Garland sat on this because it would drag down too many important men without regard for their politics, why do you think they will release information that will truly implicate Trump beyond innuendo at this point? I think too much of this is wishful thinking on all sides.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
36,249
71,659
113
Does anyone really believe anything will come of this other than more innuendo?

We all know important and powerful men visited the island and were friendly with Epstein. I don't think we will ever find any conclusive evidence that any of these men Trump, Clinton, etc. slept with underage girls. Do you think Epstein had a list of powerful men, their sex acts and the age of the women in a drawer?

The clamoring for more and more information from the DOJ likely conflicts with accusations lacking real evidence.
Yes.
That's been the point from the beginning.
Trump and the MAGA crowd hyped the fuck out of this because "the evil Dems are covering up for the pedophiles" was catnip to the frothy base.
They're the ones who insisted there was a list kept by Epstein, that there were videotapes of specific men, etc.
(Obviously not everyone and some people meant a list of people that investigators had put together, which would be a much more reasonable thing to exist.)

They pushed it constantly and then promised to deliver it when in power.

And, at a certain point, said "Nope, there is no there there."
And said they wouldn't release anything.

And it blew up in their face.

I've seen more than one Dem politician frame this as a dilemma - either release the files and maybe incriminate yourself or admit there was no list and you've been lying all this time.

It's just opportunism right now.

It's Dems finally taking advantage of Glonzo.

1752869790453.png

Now, what is interesting has been Trump's reaction.
Has he been so weird about it just because he's a malignant narcissist who can't understand why people aren't just dropping something he said should be dropped?
Or is there something there in the investigation? Even if there is no "list", it doesn't mean there isn't evidence in the files for the Epstein and Maxwell cases.
It doesn't even need to be evidence of underage sex, it could well be financial bullshit, as I mentioned above.
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
10,020
9,034
113
It was on Pam Bondi's desk.
According to that renown Democrat Pam Bondi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
36,249
71,659
113
For those who think they are closing in on Trump with the Epstein files, I'm going with the theory that Merrick Garland would not have sat on evidence that implicates Trump for four years.
We would have no idea if there was an ongoing investigation of Trump for this. Especially if it was multiple people being investigated.
I completely agree that if there was a convenient list marked "People I am blackmailing" then we probably would have seen it.

Now if you think that Garland sat on this because it would drag down too many important men without regard for their politics, why do you think they will release information that will truly implicate Trump beyond innuendo at this point? I think too much of this is wishful thinking on all sides.
Remember that a lot of what people are clamoring for as new files now are the ones from the Maxwell trial, which were under seal until late 2024 or early 2025, I believe.
So Biden couldn't have released them before the election anyway.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
8,199
2,639
113
Yes.
That's been the point from the beginning.
Trump and the MAGA crowd hyped the fuck out of this because "the evil Dems are covering up for the pedophiles" was catnip to the frothy base.
They're the ones who insisted there was a list kept by Epstein, that there were videotapes of specific men, etc.
(Obviously not everyone and some people meant a list of people that investigators had put together, which would be a much more reasonable thing to exist.)

They pushed it constantly and then promised to deliver it when in power.

And, at a certain point, said "Nope, there is no there there."
And said they wouldn't release anything.

And it blew up in their face.

I've seen more than one Dem politician frame this as a dilemma - either release the files and maybe incriminate yourself or admit there was no list and you've been lying all this time.

It's just opportunism right now.

It's Dems finally taking advantage of Glonzo.

View attachment 462957

Now, what is interesting has been Trump's reaction.
Has he been so weird about it just because he's a malignant narcissist who can't understand why people aren't just dropping something he said should be dropped?
Or is there something there in the investigation? Even if there is no "list", it doesn't mean there isn't evidence in the files for the Epstein and Maxwell cases.
It doesn't even need to be evidence of underage sex, it could well be financial bullshit, as I mentioned above.
I never followed this "Epstein" list thing much. I didn't try to differentiate whether there was more Democrats than Republicans or vice versa. I guess Prince Andrew had some things to be ashamed about. I have some very conservative friends and even they didn't talk or post about Epstein anywhere.

I just think it was one of those salacious stories that attracts certain types of people with certain thinking. I noticed some newscasts and news podcasts are obsessed with the topic. That's probably because it attracts a rabid audience. Without naming names, I don't think TERB and other social media sites are known for the clearest thinkers.

Does that mean I think Jeffrey Epstein killed himself? Hell no!
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
8,102
5,877
113
They were under the age to be PAID for sex but not the age of consent. So while they broke the law it is not really the same as pedophilia...IMHO Then you have the additional crime of transport for the purposes.
Wow you people are weirdos. You think it's ok for muddle age men to manipulate 14 year old kids to have sex with them? You are sick people
 
Toronto Escorts