Incall in Brampton busted

[DareU2]

If it wasn't for the fact the kids were in the home, I'd ask the cops to spend their time on more important things.... but the kids makes a differance

http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Story/20050811-008/page.asp

 

[katetoronto]

Those poor kids.

I usually think the cops have no business doing stuff like this, but for the kid's sake, I'm glad they busted them.

 

[WhaWhaWha]

Very often "Kids at Home" means late at night, kids asleep and isolated away from activity. LE would try to convince the press that the activity is happening in full view of the household. Some SPs are very good/lucky at keeping one seperate from the other. But eventually their luck runs out. very often the desperate resort to this. I hope they go easy on her and she figures out a way to do business outside the household.

 

[Meister]

Very often "Kids at Home" means late at night, kids asleep and isolated away from activity. LE would try to convince the press that the activity is happening in full view of the household.

You can try to justify it, but it's just plain wrong. What if the kid "walks in" or needs urgent help.

There used to be the infamous SP in Mississauga with her black pimp, I think Sierra or something, who had her daughter playing with her tricycle as the client would walk in.

Either do it when the kids are in school or are at a babysitter's.

 

[C Dick]

The article says two women were involved, the mother and the babysitter. How irresponsible could the SP be if she hired a babysitter? Could it be that the babysitter's "involvement" was babysitting the kids so that they would not be exposed to any of the prostitution? Could it be that the mother was being responsible, instead of say leaving the two year old in the care of the twelve year old (legal in Ontario), and going out to work?

Could it be that the police sometimes skew things to look a certain way, to justify actions that they wish to take? I have no additional information, I am just supposing.