When does a provacation become a terrorist attack in your opinion?Where is the terrorist attack?
When does a provacation become a terrorist attack in your opinion?Where is the terrorist attack?
So it's all because those greedy cunts wanted their own sovereign state? The audacity.You should go back further.
Prior to 1947 and the zionist movement the mandate of Palestine was a pretty multicultural place, as were most of the countries around them. Beirut was the Paris of the middle east, Iraq had a vibrant Jewish community as did a lot of other Arabic countries.
The zionist movement has been the problem. Not the Jewish people and not Palestinians, but zionism. Its a stupidly 19th century racist colonial movement that has not made Jews or anyone else safer or happier. Stupid ethno states.
Long way to go to catch up to the Hamas record achieved last Saturday. One child every 15 seconds was their score I believe.Right now Israel is killing a child every 15 minutes. You want more of that?
wouldn't want to subscribe to all that bullshit..https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123275572295011847
Wall Street journa - How Israel helped spawn Hamas.
1. they were passing legislation that oppressed in large minorty. 2. they subverted their own democracy. 3. they renged on a UNSC endorsed peace agreement that the head comedian promised to implement the peace deal. 4. Comedian then did a 180 (maybe bribed or threathend) 5. Ukraine was building up a force to attack Donbas (hint the war against this large force has taken more then a year and is still ongoing) 6. Ukraine refused to maintain its neutral status and wanted to join NATO, which Russia views as a threat. Almost every nation in nato has attacked Russia in its history. We are already hearing the US complaining about a PLA liasion office in Cuba and a Chinese secuirty agreement with effin Samoa. So please don't tell me this is "has no basis bla bla bla" Russia offered to negotiate options, the US said "fuck off go and attack Ukraine if you dare" and so here we are.Why do you believe Ukraine was an oppressive torn hellhole until a dictating warlord decided to invade?
Terrorism generally implies attacks against unarmed civilians for political, religious or some other ideological reason. But it's a highly controversial term that can leave journalists taking sides in a conflict.YOu don't back the rule of law...you back Hamas....somehow you still think their actions are justified....Israel can't remove Hamas without collateral damage....Hamas after all uses civilians as body shields, they uses residential areas as rocket installations...the Palestinians need to remove Hamas...they need to fix the problem they created...
As far as I know non-Muslims are allowed to visit the Al-Aqsa mosque, the third holiest site in Islam, under a "status quo" agreement, but are forbidden to pray there.Someone here explained that they did not storm anything and that it was apparently allowed per the law. I am yet to find that post. So I dont think any resulting violence falls under the terrorism category. However, there were other settler violences that have resulted in needless deaths. Those are definitely terrorist attacks and yes, I support putting one right between the eyes for those assholes too.
Hamas repeatedly commited terrorism...targeting innocent civilians...then hide behind palestinians when facing retribution.... Israel warns civilians to evacuate evacerate pinpoint strategic military targets...I wouldn't put it past Hamas to of course put civilians in those installations.... it's their MO ever since...inflict damage and when Israel retaliates...they made sure there will be civilians victims....to gain sympathy....Terrorism generally implies attacks against unarmed civilians for political, religious or some other ideological reason. But it's a highly controversial term that can leave journalists taking sides in a conflict.
You keep backing acts that fit the definition of terrorism then try to justify it by saying Hamas commits terrorism.
I back the law, charge Hamas and the Israeli leadership and stop the killing.
You can tell this guy...Terrorism generally implies attacks against unarmed civilians for political, religious or some other ideological reason. But it's a highly controversial term that can leave journalists taking sides in a conflict.
You keep backing acts that fit the definition of terrorism then try to justify it by saying Hamas commits terrorism.
I back the law, charge Hamas and the Israeli leadership and stop the killing.
Imagine that - this just in - War is STILL Hell.Terrorism generally implies attacks against unarmed civilians for political, religious or some other ideological reason. But it's a highly controversial term that can leave journalists taking sides in a conflict.
You keep backing acts that fit the definition of terrorism then try to justify it by saying Hamas commits terrorism.
I back the law, charge Hamas and the Israeli leadership and stop the killing.
No, terrorists are not designated by governments, they are designated by the acts they commit.Hamas IS a terrorist group. They do not have any right to designate anyone as terrorists. Terrorists are designated by legitimate governments, not other terror groups.
Israel's goal - the elimination of the democratically elected party HamasThe actual definition of terrorism.
Acts of violence for political gain.
Erego
Israel’s acts are not terrorism
Hamas/Palestinians are.
Hence why Hamas is listed as a terrorist group and Isreal isn’t.
They are not the only ones that can say so.Yes. Terrorists are designated by governments based on the acts they commit. The Hamas is a designated terror group per Canada for example.
Your posts doesn't describe Israel's actions...i.t describes Hamas actions....Israel's goal - the elimination of the democratically elected party Hamas
That's political and therefore terrorism.
So why do you support some terrorism and they say other terrorism is evil?
![]()
When was the last time there were elections in Gaza? Calling them democratic at this point is silly.Israel's goal - the elimination of the democratically elected party Hamas
That's political and therefore terrorism.
So why do you support some terrorism and they say other terrorism is evil?
![]()
Wrong....nice generalization though...They are not the only ones that can say so.
Otherwise you'd still be saying that Nelson Mandela is a terrorist.
Otherwise you'd say Mahatma Gandhi was a terrorist.
And you'd be saying Modi is a terrorist.
![]()
India's Modi faces backlash for backing terror accused candidate
For nearly a decade, Pragya Thakur was known mostly as the saffron-clad Hindu ascetic shuttling in and out of Indian courts, flanked by police, facing charges under an anti-terrorism law for plotting a bomb attack on Muslims.www.reuters.com
You can't get much more explicit than this:Your posts doesn't describe Israel's actions...i.t describes Hamas actions....
Palestinians were given warning to evacuate...they were not held hostages in exchange for something.
Hamas didn't give warnings (textbook terrorist move...remember the Nazi? Blitzkrieg?
2006 was the last election.When was the last time there were elections in Gaza? Calling them democratic at this point is silly.





