Milton Man, 22, charged with murder after fatally shooting suspect who tried to rob his house, lawyer says

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
16,146
7,812
113
I think we're missing some key details into the incident. It does sound a little outrageous that he is being charged with second degree murder. It is my understanding (and I'm not 100% sure about this) that under our laws, you have a duty to retreat from violence and that we don't have a so-called Castle Law like in the US. So, this means the expectation is to run away if you can.

Now, the fact that he had a firearm and killed the intruder....who may have had a firearms....is bizarre. Especially since he had a legal and registered gun...But, the other question here...and i don't mean to blame the victim of a home invasion....but why was this house targeted? Is this Ali Mian doing illegal shit, like selling drugs or guns? Is he known to police?

This story reminds me of something that happened in Lethbridge (I think) about a decade ago. Someone tried to break into a home, the owner scared them away, and took a shot at them with a rifle as they were running away. Didn't hit them. However, he was outraged that he was being charged for a firearms violation. Again, under Canadian law, you don't have the right to kill people when they are not threatening you or someone else....
The problem here is that....even though we might not h ave "castle law" the duty to retreat is out of discussion since you're already in your abode which is suppose to be your safe place, your refuge, and once someone broke into that safe place, it is no longer safe for you and you are in direct threat of violence...discharging a firearm might just be your only way out...
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,017
11,265
113
and once someone broke into that safe place, it is no longer safe for you and you are in direct threat of violence...discharging a firearm might just be your only way out...
Some people might argue you are supposed to "de-escalate" the situation.

Shooting the culprit in the back is to ensure he/she/they don't come back and burn your house down.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,935
9,357
113
I posted the video for a frame of reference.
I posted the article in response to a post about an occurance and statement made by the same sheriff.
There is no chest thumping.
There is no "rejoicing" and I didn't make any jokes, just an observation.
If you find my post malicious, you may need to reevaluate yourself.
Derogrotory terms are no way to conduct yourself in an adult discussion.
Good day.
Okay I misunderstood in that case, I apologize. I was just outraged by the way the police were spinning that story per my other post.
 

madappl3s

Active member
Oct 6, 2022
138
126
43
Buffalo New York
Its not up to people to play judge, jury and executioner. The courts should decide that and even in cases of murder I am not for the death penalty. I am not for state sponsored revenge.

Killing someone in self defence when they attack you or your family is one thing.

But the entire police force exacting revenge on someone for committing a crime against one of their own, is very problematic gang like behavior. Which is what they are really. Goons in uniform. They always operate on a us (police) vs them (civilians) basis.
It very much is up to our society how we deal with people like this, humans who commit these type of acts aren't human. They're something else and deserve every action coming their way
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,935
9,357
113
It very much is up to our society how we deal with people like this, humans who commit these type of acts aren't human. They're something else and deserve every action coming their way
That is why we as a society have institutions such as the courts to judge and convict as necessary. And yes they are very much human and demonizing them is just your own mental gymnastics to support something that is fundamentally grotesque.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
16,146
7,812
113
Some people might argue you are supposed to "de-escalate" the situation.

Shooting the culprit in the back is to ensure he/she/they don't come back and burn your house down.
Shooting an intruder IS to "de-escalate" the situation...
 
  • Like
Reactions: tastingyou

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
16,146
7,812
113
But the entire police force exacting revenge on someone for committing a crime against one of their own, is very problematic gang like behavior. Which is what they are really. Goons in uniform. They always operate on a us (police) vs them (civilians) basis.
I wouldn't call it exacting revenge...more like taking matters seriously...if a criminal had the balls to take out a cop....he's probably killed a lot of civilians or won't h esitate to kill one...most criminals are opportunistic and will prey on the weak and vulnerable and would avoid cops...
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,935
9,357
113
I wouldn't call it exacting revenge...more like taking matters seriously...if a criminal had the balls to take out a cop....he's probably killed a lot of civilians or won't h esitate to kill one...most criminals are opportunistic and will prey on the weak and vulnerable and would avoid cops...
No that is not why.

It is gang like behavior. It has nothing to do with "taking matters seriously".

It is an us vs them mentality that cops have and the moment someone kills a cop the entire police force gangs up on the guy not to arrest and bring the guy to justice, but to murder him. This is not new. It is a well documented fact.

There was a case a while ago, where a car passed by a parked police vehicle and as it did, backfired. The cop thought he was being fired at. Some 40 or 50 squad cars gave chase, cornered the couple (black couple I must add) in the car, and riddled the car with bullets with each person being shot over 50 times.

Cops are nothing but glorified goons in uniform. They need to be put in their place.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,408
1,702
113
First off the investigation is done by detectives who are trained to do so.
Second of all its reviewed by lawyers and if there's something there it may go to a grand jury.
Why put something to trial and make the person defending his/her property and/or life pay tens of thousands of dollars for a legal defense and clog up more court time unnecessarily?
Grand jury? Are you in the US or Liberia? Because those are the only two places where those exist.
 

Adamxx

Active member
Oct 29, 2018
208
139
43
Interesting article which states the following regarding unlawful home entry:

Sections 34 and 35 of the code say someone is not guilty of an offence if their actions were a “reasonable” response to a threat of or actual use of force, or to stop someone from entering or damaging property without permission.

Here is the link: https://apple.news/Abqe6m3OgRiKt7VoabmEmNA
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
28,521
9,606
113
Room 112
WTF are you talking about?

That's not how it works in Canada. We don't have grand juries, they don't exist here. Second cops charge people and it goes to court. In Ontario it's not reviewed by lawyers.
We have preliminary hearings my bad. Grade 11 law was a long time ago. Cops investigate but its the crown attorneys who determine whether there is sufficient evidence to lay charges.
 

tastingyou

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2014
754
1,219
93
No that is not why.

It is gang like behavior. It has nothing to do with "taking matters seriously".

It is an us vs them mentality that cops have and the moment someone kills a cop the entire police force gangs up on the guy not to arrest and bring the guy to justice, but to murder him. This is not new. It is a well documented fact.

There was a case a while ago, where a car passed by a parked police vehicle and as it did, backfired. The cop thought he was being fired at. Some 40 or 50 squad cars gave chase, cornered the couple (black couple I must add) in the car, and riddled the car with bullets wither each person being shot over 50 times.

Cops are nothing but glorified goons in uniform. They need to be put in their place.
I agree that maybe as many as 10% of cops are as bad as the thugs that they are supposedly protecting us from - furthermore they have the wolf pack mentality .

Having said that 100 % of criminals are thugs and I have no regrets no matter what fate they end up getting . I have no problem saying good riddance to them. Current crime statistics is conclusively showing that the justice system and the parole system is doing a horrendous job in protecting us due to our increasingly WOKE SOCIETY worrying more about the criminal than the innocent.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,935
9,357
113
I agree that maybe as many as 10% of cops are as bad as the thugs that they are supposedly protecting us from - furthermore they have the wolf pack mentality .

Having said that 100 % of criminals are thugs and I have no regrets no matter what fate they end up getting . I have no problem saying good riddance to them. Current crime statistics is conclusively showing that the justice system and the parole system is doing a horrendous job in protecting us due to our increasingly WOKE SOCIETY worrying more about the criminal than the innocent.
The current system with plea bargains etc make criminals out of people who are not criminals. That said, it is a dystopian world if we justify extra judicial killings of criminals by the police, rather than arrest them and bring them to justice (which is actually the police force's job) because you think there is a problem with the justice/parole system. It is the law and every person deserving due process is a constitutional right.
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,307
5,420
113
Not that I disagree with the sentiment but you cannot be worried about the law when you and yours are being threatened. I mean if someone who isn't supposed to be in your property, is in your property, with any sort of nefarious intent, then you should be justified in making the choice to use lethal force - whether or not they were "running away", which is very hard to determine or react to in the moment.
You are 100% correct. I find these cases can be difficult to understand on occasion. And nobody can say how they would react if this happened to their family/home. I would like to know more of the details regarding this. I mean, why was this guy's home targeted? Apparently the CBC has a quote from a neighbour who says a week ago masked people were scoping the backyard out...So, immediately I wonder if this Mian guy was into drugs or other illegal activity. Or, does his family run a jewelry store or something like that.


Its not up to people to play judge, jury and executioner. The courts should decide that and even in cases of murder I am not for the death penalty. I am not for state sponsored revenge.

Killing someone in self defence when they attack you or your family is one thing.

But the entire police force exacting revenge on someone for committing a crime against one of their own, is very problematic gang like behavior. Which is what they are really. Goons in uniform. They always operate on a us (police) vs them (civilians) basis.
There is a reason why the police are called the world's biggest street gang. But, also, I find it interesting how they are able to take some mass shooters (i.e. Dylan Roof) alive, but an "illegal" is ventilated....Now, I will say that police are allowed (and should be allowed) to use deadly force in situations where someone is actively shooting at people. But this sheriff's glib responses are just a little beyond the pale...
 
  • Like
Reactions: krealtarron

dirtyharry555

Well-known member
Feb 7, 2011
2,837
2,327
113
But shooting a fleeing guy in the back is pretty clearly over the line.
If someone breaks into your home with the intent to murder you, by not killing them, they can come back better prepared to be successful another time.

A planned armed break and enter is not a "mistake" and it's not to be taken lightly.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
47,022
5,615
113
If someone breaks into your home with the intent to murder you, by not killing them, they can come back better prepared to be successful another time.

A planned armed break and enter is not a "mistake" and it's not to be taken lightly.
I agree.

I have a friend in a nice quiet area in Toronto, who had 2 guys with baseball bat break in at 3am in a almost military style hit that sent him to the hospital for a month with broken head and other bones.

Police did nothing, except urging him to drop a law suit against somebody.

I have guns and a reputation for being slightly crazy.
 

Mrboobs

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2017
721
497
63
First off the investigation is done by detectives who are trained to do so.
Second of all its reviewed by lawyers and if there's something there it may go to a grand jury.
Why put something to trial and make the person defending his/her property and/or life pay tens of thousands of dollars for a legal defense and clog up more court time unnecessarily?
We don’t have grand juries, it goes to a preliminary hearing and decided by the courts.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,565
17,630
113
I agree.

I have a friend in a nice quiet area in Toronto, who had 2 guys with baseball bat break in at 3am in a almost military style hit that sent him to the hospital for a month with broken head and other bones.

Police did nothing, except urging him to drop a law suit against somebody.

I have guns and a reputation for being slightly crazy.
So your buddy's was a targeted hit?
 
Toronto Escorts