Musk turns on Trump! Grab your popcorn!

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
8,121
5,136
113
Thanks for proving my point.
NASA has been been doing this longer and have accomplished far more than SpaceX ever has (or will for that matter).
But you suggested they're cons for planning on making Mars inhabitable?

Are you confused again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: optimusprime69

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,351
7,852
113
Shaquille: "You can't reuse something before the flight ends"
You mean SpaceX rockets just float down and land gently without any boosters? Lol!
Skoob: Reusable after recovery means they are not used in the landing at all. Reusable because they do not need to be recovered and are used in the landing is completely different.
Hahahahahhahaha.
Landing a booster or fetching it from the sea, are both different methods of booster recovery, so that they can be reused again.
In both cases boosters are being refurbished and reused for another flight.
Looks like you have face planted one too many times from all the failed mental gymnastics.lmfao.
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
8,333
6,122
113
Skoob: Reusable after recovery means they are not used in the landing at all. Reusable because they do not need to be recovered and are used in the landing is completely different.
Hahahahahhahaha.
Landing a booster or fetching it from the sea, are both different methods of booster recovery, so that they can be reused again.
In both cases boosters are being refurbished and reused for another flight.
Looks like you have face planted one too many times from all the failed mental gymnastics.lmfao.
He's not only a political expert, a scholar, a scientist, an expert in education, but also a rocket scientist.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
37,050
75,032
113
The context here was whether Musk is a con for aspiring to make Mars habitable. My point was if you believe he is, then you also believe NASA and the entire government and community of scientists are as well.

So?

But that's an insane comparison.
What NASA is discussing and what Musk are promising are wildly different.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
8,121
5,136
113
No I said that Elon Musk is a con for claiming to put 1M people on Mars in a self sustaining city.
Are you lying again?
So if NASA suggests making Mars habitable it's for what, 2 people? Lol!

You fell on your face when you didn't know NASA was also exploring making Mars habitable.
All you are doing now is failing at trying to recover from that.

It's not working for you. You just keep looking more stupid with every response. But by all means, continue. It's entertaining.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
8,121
5,136
113
Skoob: Reusable after recovery means they are not used in the landing at all. Reusable because they do not need to be recovered and are used in the landing is completely different.
Hahahahahhahaha.
Landing a booster or fetching it from the sea, are both different methods of booster recovery, so that they can be reused again.
In both cases boosters are being refurbished and reused for another flight.
Looks like you have face planted one too many times from all the failed mental gymnastics.lmfao.
You are definitely a special kind of stupid aren't you.

How does a rocket land after it ejects the boosters in your mind?

Do they go fetch those boosters and re-attach them to the rocket before it attempts to land?

Please keep demonstrating your stupidity...you are the gift that keeps on giving.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: optimusprime69

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
8,121
5,136
113
But that's an insane comparison.
What NASA is discussing and what Musk are promising are wildly different.
Please explain.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Valcazar

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,351
7,852
113
You are definitely a special kind of stupid aren't you.
How does a rocket land after it ejects the boosters in your mind?
We know in SpaceX's case the boosters land dummy.
Whether the boosters are landed or recovered from the sea, they are both reused. Aka, they are reusable solid rocket boosters.
Reusable boosters are not a SpaceX invention. It is NASA's.
Learn to construct a coherent sentence instead of humiliating yourself over and over.
 

Jubee

Well-known member
May 29, 2016
5,249
2,837
113
Ontario
The scripted feud has taken a back burner to Israel/Iran which has taken front page news.

there's always soemthing to cover the news... with shit that's not important like Diddy and Hockey Trial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
8,121
5,136
113
NASA and Elon are not remotely saying the same things.
Stop lying.
In fact they are. Both are exploring the possibilities are inhabiting Mars.
You seem to think one has a different goal than the other.

But then again, you are just trying to recover from your epic failure at even knowing NASA was working on this as well.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: optimusprime69

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
8,121
5,136
113
We know in SpaceX's case the boosters land dummy.
Whether the boosters are landed or recovered from the sea, they are both reused. Aka, they are reusable solid rocket boosters.
Reusable boosters are not a SpaceX invention. It is NASA's.
Learn to construct a coherent sentence instead of humiliating yourself over and over.
Reusing to the boosters to land as part of the same flight is the accomplishment. Not simply reusing boosters after the fact.

You are a special kind of stupid aren't you?

btw remind me to get CBSA to verify your visa soon.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: optimusprime69

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,351
7,852
113
In fact they are.
No they are not.
NASA is developing technologies that could be used in future exploration.
Elon is claiming he will put 1M people in a self-sustaining city on Mars by 2050.
These are wildly different claims and only a discombobulated, confused mind grasping at straws would find equivalence in this.
 
Toronto Escorts