But you suggested they're cons for planning on making Mars inhabitable?Thanks for proving my point.
NASA has been been doing this longer and have accomplished far more than SpaceX ever has (or will for that matter).
Are you confused again?
But you suggested they're cons for planning on making Mars inhabitable?Thanks for proving my point.
NASA has been been doing this longer and have accomplished far more than SpaceX ever has (or will for that matter).
No I said that Elon Musk is a con for claiming to put 1M people on Mars in a self sustaining city.But you suggested they're cons for planning on making Mars inhabitable?
Skoob: Reusable after recovery means they are not used in the landing at all. Reusable because they do not need to be recovered and are used in the landing is completely different.Shaquille: "You can't reuse something before the flight ends"
You mean SpaceX rockets just float down and land gently without any boosters? Lol!
What happened to TACOs cities in the sky ?No I said that Elon Musk is a con for claiming to put 1M people on Mars in a self sustaining city.
Are you lying again?
He's not only a political expert, a scholar, a scientist, an expert in education, but also a rocket scientist.Skoob: Reusable after recovery means they are not used in the landing at all. Reusable because they do not need to be recovered and are used in the landing is completely different.
Hahahahahhahaha.
Landing a booster or fetching it from the sea, are both different methods of booster recovery, so that they can be reused again.
In both cases boosters are being refurbished and reused for another flight.
Looks like you have face planted one too many times from all the failed mental gymnastics.lmfao.
The context here was whether Musk is a con for aspiring to make Mars habitable. My point was if you believe he is, then you also believe NASA and the entire government and community of scientists are as well.
So?
Your point? Lol. You are pointless...Thanks for proving my point.
NASA has been been doing this longer and have accomplished far more than SpaceX ever has (or will for that matter).
So if NASA suggests making Mars habitable it's for what, 2 people? Lol!No I said that Elon Musk is a con for claiming to put 1M people on Mars in a self sustaining city.
Are you lying again?
You are definitely a special kind of stupid aren't you.Skoob: Reusable after recovery means they are not used in the landing at all. Reusable because they do not need to be recovered and are used in the landing is completely different.
Hahahahahhahaha.
Landing a booster or fetching it from the sea, are both different methods of booster recovery, so that they can be reused again.
In both cases boosters are being refurbished and reused for another flight.
Looks like you have face planted one too many times from all the failed mental gymnastics.lmfao.
Please explain.But that's an insane comparison.
What NASA is discussing and what Musk are promising are wildly different.
NASA and Elon are not remotely saying the same things.So if NASA suggests making Mars habitable it's for what, 2 people? Lol!
We know in SpaceX's case the boosters land dummy.You are definitely a special kind of stupid aren't you.
How does a rocket land after it ejects the boosters in your mind?
In fact they are. Both are exploring the possibilities are inhabiting Mars.NASA and Elon are not remotely saying the same things.
Stop lying.
Reusing to the boosters to land as part of the same flight is the accomplishment. Not simply reusing boosters after the fact.We know in SpaceX's case the boosters land dummy.
Whether the boosters are landed or recovered from the sea, they are both reused. Aka, they are reusable solid rocket boosters.
Reusable boosters are not a SpaceX invention. It is NASA's.
Learn to construct a coherent sentence instead of humiliating yourself over and over.
No they are not.In fact they are.