Trump is now bragging about taking bribes. What a disgusting POS...
No need, I agree.Especially the USA govt, now controlled completely by the GOP. Using ICe, the largest funded LE now, regularly breaking the 1st, 4th amendments. Oh and Trump looking into breaking the 2nd as well. With Palintr getting the surveillance contracts from them.
Want me to continue?
He should run for office.
Kind of festive, you know. All those colors.Well, lots of Palestinian flags at the protests, they weren't wrong on that. Lots of Mexican flags too.![]()
I wonder if he remembers Obama extending Bush's Patriot Act?
I'm sure he does and would be critical of it.I wonder if he remembers Obama extending Bush's Patriot Act?
Oh Butler, you're always cheering on the demise of the United States.Thats what they said about the Vietnam protests.
These things are only going to escalate. Bounties are now being placed on ICE agents and they are being doxxed. We are getting closer to real organized resistance like the 70's groups. I see bombings on ice facilities coming.
Especially when the economy finally tanks.
Trump would not have regurgitated posts all night on his own social media account if yesterday`s rally did not piss him off.Oh Butler, you're always cheering on the demise of the United States.
As I have said, the U.S. has a history of protests. It also has a fairly continuous history of political violence. The latter is an unfortunate part of our Nation's DNA. At the end of the violence that you are hoping for are fringe actors often from groups with disparate ideals. It is not a cohesive movement that rallies public sentiment.
I have heard estimates of 7 million people participating. That is certainly a big number even if we allow room for some fudging of the estimate. However, that's still only about 4.4% of the total voters in last year's election.On a superficial level you are right, of course, there is only an indirect connection between rally size in general and voting.
That was something I've had to explain to Sanders and Trump voters repeatedly in the past.
Rallies are important, they are useful. They forge connections, help morale, and display a certain amount of political power in organizing things, but they aren't votes and that's a separate lever of the equation.
The real demonstration here is that this is the second one, and they still got a big turnout. It's easy to do one big splashy rally, using that to build and maintain momentum is hard.
Taking the approach of "these are useless, the government doesn't care and they don't really have any impact on voters" is a strong tactic to use in many cases.
Ever wonder why they turn violent? Could it be because the government doesn't actually listen and pay attention to the needs of the people?Oh Butler, you're always cheering on the demise of the United States.
As I have said, the U.S. has a history of protests. It also has a fairly continuous history of political violence. The latter is an unfortunate part of our Nation's DNA. At the end of the violence that you are hoping for are fringe actors often from groups with disparate ideals. It is not a cohesive movement that rallies public sentiment.
It just depends on what people are protesting. Progressive members like to go on and on about universal Canadian healthcare. Do you think people were protesting healthcare at yesterday's rally? Probably a few, but most likely significantly outnumbered by other fractional protests.Ever wonder why they turn violent? Could it be because the government doesn't actually listen and pay attention to the needs of the people?
I'm not cheering on the demise of the nation. Just it's present oligarchy.
Biggest protest in american history, I hear.I have heard estimates of 7 million people participating. That is certainly a big number even if we allow room for some fudging of the estimate. However, that's still only about 4.4% of the total voters in last year's election.
Yes, I do agree that forging connections, helping morale, displaying some political power and organization is useful. When it comes to sheer numbers though, the internet makes it much easier to bring people together in this manner. I'm guessing that the 7 million gathered mostly in blue cities. I also presume these people follow certain liberal/progressive social media and websites. (I actually have no idea where the No Kings rally was where I live. I'm sure there was a lot of people in attendance.)
Aha The Jewish conspiracy theory, you're in good company on the Terb political forum, most hate Jews, Christians, Whites and love Islamic terrorists.Soros, , Greenberg, Levin, Sanders, what do all of these creatures have in common? oy vey
Donnie loves Miriam...Aha The Jewish conspiracy theory, you're in good company on the Terb political forum, most hate Jews, Christians, Whites and love Islamic terrorists.
And we all know how you feel about the Jews.I love how wacko this is.
Its a great conspiracy that the left wing Jewish money, aka Soros, is now paying protesters to stop the No Kings protests from being about trump to make them about the genocide. So you think Jewish money is secretly campaigning to turn the US against Israel?
cool
They are protesting the US forming and funding the largest police force in the nation, who's members have, on a regular basis, been dening 1st, 4th amendment rights even to citizens. Taking children and zip tying them, held a 5 year old autistic girl hosage to try to force a father out, and the regular police coming in to return the child.It just depends on what people are protesting. Progressive members like to go and on about universal Canadian healthcare. Do you think people were protesting healthcare at yesterday's rally? Probably a few, but most likely significantly outnumbered by other fractional protests.
Canadian society has always been tranquil. I'm not as well-versed in Canadian history. I do know you didn't have a revolution and you were generally fine with the monarchy for several decades after our revolution. That is not a criticism. That's just a comment on the gradualist nature of Canadian politics.






