Quantifying Attractiveness in Women

[Paladin]

Here is a perspective on how the measurements, height and weight can be used to determine a woman's attractiveness. The body mass index gives an indication of the body fat and is calculated as
Body Mass Index = Weight(kg) / Height(m)2
The typical ranges are:

Fashion models: 17.57
Other models, including centerfolds: 18.09
Anorexic women: 14.72
Normal women: 18.5-24.9
Overweight: 25-29.9
Obese: 30 and greater

The waist to bust and waist to hip ratios are used to define the type of figure:

Models: 0.60-0.71 for the waist to bust and waist to hip ratios
Normal women: 0.72-0.76
Overweight: 0.77 and greater

The waist to bust and waist to hip ratios cannot be used as definitive indicators because a woman with a 36-24-36 figure has the same ratios as a woman with a 42-28-42 figure.

I use the BMI and waist to hip and waist to bust ratios together to set a range of acceptable parameters for an attractive woman:

BMI: 17.5 to 18.2 and
W/H and W/B: 0.6-0.71 (with maximum hip of 36”)

This sets a weight range of:

122-127 lbs at 5’10”
115-120 lbs at 5’8”
108-113 lbs at 5’6”
102-106 lbs at 5’4”

I still have not established a method to quantify beauty and personality.

 

[Don]

I like 'em slim and those numbers look pretty damn good to me

 

[Laura]

Paladin

This sets a weight range of:

122-127 lbs at 5’10”

115-120 lbs at 5’8”

108-113 lbs at 5’6”

102-106 lbs at 5’4”

I am sorry these weights and heights are unhealthy and unrealistic. A runway model stands 5'10" and weights 125 lbs she is all skin and bone. The same goes with the rest of your ideals. How do these ladies get this way.....drugs, vomiting, diet pills and the list goes on.

Staying healthy to a woman comes now from better education. It is called nutrition and fitness.

Also the chances of child bearing at those weights should you find the ideal woman is usually unlikely.

Laura

 

[duncecap]

I like em slim too but those numbers seem pretty unrealistic. Maybe if you dropped the heights by 2+ inches.

 

[Monte Cristo]

...or add about 3-5 lbs. to each category

Then again, if bust size is a mitigating factor, add a few more. Personally, I like a little more than two fried eggs and a flat ass is also a turn-off!

 

[2sexxxy]

Numbers look good to me. What do I care what they have to do to look that way as long as there 2sexxxy like me.

 

[Heather]

Laura's right. Dropping below 18% body fat can easily put a woman's body into ammenorhea, where a woman's cycles cease because her body simply could not support a pregnancy. If that doesn't tell you it's unhealthy, what does?

The healthy range for a woman is between 20-25%
At 20% that would work out to a minimum of aprox.

5'4"= 116
5'6"= 124
5'8"= 131
5'10"=139

 

[Bboy]

Body Mass Index = Weight(kg) / Height(m)2
The typical ranges are:

Fashion models: 17.57
Other models, including centerfolds: 18.09
Anorexic women: 14.72
Normal women: 18.5-24.9
Overweight: 25-29.9
Obese: 30 and greater

The waist to bust and waist to hip ratios are used to define the type of figure:

Models: 0.60-0.71 for the waist to bust and waist to hip ratios
Normal women: 0.72-0.76
Overweight: 0.77 and greater

I use the BMI and waist to hip and waist to bust ratios together to set a range of acceptable parameters for an attractive woman:

BMI: 17.5 to 18.2 and
W/H and W/B: 0.6-0.71 (with maximum hip of 36”)

This sets a weight range of:

122-127 lbs at 5’10”
115-120 lbs at 5’8”
108-113 lbs at 5’6”
102-106 lbs at 5’4”

I'd need a computer to pick my sp!....oh wait I have one! Nah still like my method.....WOW she looks good!

 

[iguana]

I am sorry these weights and heights are unhealthy and unrealistic

How did I know that this was from a woman?

 

[Toad-O-Line]

Interesting thread......

I agree with the ladies in the fact that decreasing the body fat is unhealthy.

A friend of mine is annorexic and/or bulemic (sp?). Very sad case. She is extremely pretty and is a warm wonderful person - But it is horrifying to watch her risk her life with this disease (vitamin deficiency, risk of burning out ones' esophagus, etc.).

Christ I even see it with my niece! She's only 13 & is overly concerned about her weight (she's not fat at all!!!).

This is all due to the way society has determined what women should look like (as opposed to developing naturally).

Attractiveness is what makes you look at a woman and do a double-take - Be it because of her physical appearance, or the way she handles herself in a crowd of people or the way that she encompasses you with her attitude & outlook on life.

Irregardless of body fat, a person should never be measured against a yardstick created by the general publics latest view of attractiveness.

Just my two cents.

 

[Laura]

Jealous?

I am sorry but if you are referring that I am jealous of my fellow escorts you are wrong.

I believe that your impression of weight and height is unrealistic and should not be imposed on EVERY escort.

A friend of mine (not an escort), might have to go into hospital soon because she is too thin. She thinks she is fat. She has had 3 mischarges and has been told she would probably never have a child if she does not gain weight.

These concepts get into young ladies heads in their early teens. They see the photos in magazines and think they are too fat. What they don't realize is that most professional photographers that do these magazine photos touch up the photos to make the models look thinner than they actually are.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with have low body fat, eating healthy and good exercise routine. It is when it goes beyond that to binge diets, drug use etc. to get to the level.

If you prefer very petite thin ladies then please seek them out. That is your preference. But to try to impose your beliefs on other escorts can cause problems including depression.

Recently I had new photos taken of myself. I try to eat healthy and workout. I like my appearance! Do I think I look fat?..no Well my body fat is 24%. I stand 5' 8" and weigh 130 lbs. Am I not thin enough? Well that is your decision.

One of many new photos coming soon.

http://www.lovelylaura.com/laura018.jpg

Laura

 

[xix]

Originally posted by Paladin [/i]

I am not mistaken this came from a website. I was looking at one last night and saw these numbers. They are wrong. Way off the mark. Even the people I work out with in the gym say not ot follow it if you add 15 to 25 lbs to the scale. Read further

Body Mass Index = Weight(kg) / Height(m)2
The typical ranges are:

Fashion models: 17.57
Other models, including centerfolds: 18.09
Anorexic women: 14.72
Normal women: 18.5-24.9
Overweight: 25-29.9
Obese: 30 and greater

The waist to bust and waist to hip ratios are used to define the type of figure:

Models: 0.60-0.71 for the waist to bust and waist to hip ratios
Normal women: 0.72-0.76
Overweight: 0.77 and greater

The waist to bust and waist to hip ratios cannot be used as definitive indicators because a woman with a 36-24-36 figure has the same ratios as a woman with a 42-28-42 figure.

I use the BMI and waist to hip and waist to bust ratios together to set a range of acceptable parameters for an attractive woman:

BMI: 17.5 to 18.2 and
W/H and W/B: 0.6-0.71 (with maximum hip of 36”)



This sets a weight range of:

122-127 lbs at 5’10”
115-120 lbs at 5’8”
108-113 lbs at 5’6”
102-106 lbs at 5’4”

I still have not established a method to quantify beauty and personality.

There is this girl at work who is 5'6" and she weights herself on the shipping scale. she reaches 124 to 130 depending on time of day. Believe me she is skinny and 75 guys can't be wrong HB10+.

These numbers are way off. She also believes she should be in the category that you have. There is no way in God's country this can be achieved unless she removes her hair, boobs, ( forget clothes because whe wears almost nothing ) Maybe if she remove a body part she may reach you ideal numbers.

 

[Joystick]

Why is it that we are more than ever concerned about eating right, but instead, we more than ever eat junk and chastise ourselves for not spending even more hours at dank and windowless gym?

Let's return to the old days, when 'gym' was an activity for all kids, not the domain of adults; when computers belonged to NASA and PARC and not recess; when eating good food meant taste and nutrition, and neccessitated not a trite and ubiquitous phrase ("A moment on the lips...). While we're at it let's ditch our cell phones, sell our second cars, meet our neighbours, let our kids walk to school (now there's a novel concept), be less afraid and more happy. All we need is love, love is all we need.

 

[clipper]

Beauty & Personality

I'll take beauty and personality over some mathematically perfect body every time.

Imagine some demented future world where this kind of mathematical model would be used to create "ideal" females.

Just imagine - a world full of Britney Spears and Pam Anderson look alikes with all the scintillating personality and intelligence possessed by these two.

Why men obsess over crap like this just totally eludes me.
These are probably the same guys who think "uwannadance"
is stimulating conversation as long as she's got blone hair, large bolt-ons and the cookie jar is open.

Is male intelligence an oxymoron?

 

[Don]

Bravo picky!

It is a shame in this day and age that when a women chooses to maintain a healthy lifestyle and get her BMI down to 17% other women dismiss her valiant efforts with claims that she is a diet pill junkie, druggie and/or bulimic.

I completely agree. Those number are not unrealistic. I know a few female friends who are in those weight ranges and they are very healthy. One girl I know is 5'5" and around 112 lbs and she is very fit and toned without going to extreme. She is just very active person and is naturally slim. Keeps in shape naturally by doing things she enjoys - cycling, hiking and mountain climbing.

Another girl I know is 5'4" and 110 lbs and has two children. She simply eats healthy.. that's it.

Instead of being jealous and accusing these women of doing something extreme to keep thin, why not applaud them for staying fit in the fattest contenant in the world - North America?

Lots of women are thin simply by diet, being active and sometimes blessed with having a slim body type. I once dated a girl from eastern europe and when she first came to canada, she was amazed with the health craze here... ads for gyms, workout machines and exercise videos, etc... but always wondered why people were so overweight. Then she quickly saw all the fast food joints and restaurant realized. She said that in her country people very seldom eat out but simply stay home... and a home meal is a real meal (none of that instant or microwave stuff) with lost of veggies. And since cars are a luxury, most people walk everywhere. Women in her country liked to hike and be outdoors and stay active.

There is a reason why Canada and the US are one of the fattest countries in the world. And our perception that being that slim is so unnatural... will maybe it is here but if you do some traveling, like I do, you'll see that being 5'6" and 115 lbs is not so unusual.

 

[Alanis]

Well, since we are talking about perfect bodies here, I just would like to add that sometimes I do miss interacting with some impossibly and unearthly built men out there. The world is full of beautiful women, but very handsome and visually stimulating men are hard to come by. Where are they except some clubs and gyms- but then again- if they are that beautifully built, they are usually gay anyway. Certainly, they don't frequent MPs! Except for the last time when I worked. We had some Greek-god-like extremely well-proportioned Italian stud that me and my sexy friend did a "double" on (for some serious "perverts" here: double : one guy and two girls massaging only or one poor soul, four hands and three tongues - to talk only). Well, the notion that Italians think that they are God's gift to a womankind suddenly took on a new meaning. We kind of lost track of time while in the room with him...and we couldn't stop talking about his full lips, perfect abs, and impressive muscles for the rest of the day. The sad truth is that we will probably keep on talking about this phenomenon for the next half a year , unless some lost soul would stray into our underground world again. Me and my sexy friend vowed to behave and not disturb almighty gods up there, so who knows what will be sent for us, mortals, this time...Anyways, please, gentlemen, GO to the gym yourselves and eat healthy, because some of us are as visual as you are! Make us happy as well, please!

 

[revolver]

Re: Jealous?

[Recently I had new photos taken of myself. I try to eat healthy and workout. I like my appearance! Do I think I look fat?..no Well my body fat is 24%. I stand 5' 8" and weigh 130 lbs. Am I not thin enough? Well that is your decision.

Laura, I had a look at your photo and I think you look just fine. Personally, I don't put much weight on the weights for heights listed earlier. They seemed a little unrealiistic to me and probably unhealthy.

 

[Paladin]

Looking for the Upper 0.001 Percentile Beauty

I never claimed that the indicators I use to select attractive women consider average woman. In fact, I want to screen out average women, and select the one in one hundred thousand beautiful woman.

Also BMI does not give the percentage of body fat. It is an indicator of body fat. A BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 does not equate to 18.5% body fat.

I never claimed that I was selecting women for their ability to have children. I don't want children.

I am trying to establish quantifiable measures of a woman's attractiveness to pursue pure unadulterated pleasure. The BMI criteria and the waist to hip and waist to bust ratios fit 90% of the Playboy centerfolds. I just haven't figured out how to select the best of the lot.

 

[revolver]

I think you're analyzing this way too much!

 

[dude abides]

Re: Looking for the Upper 0.001 Percentile Beauty

I just haven't figured out how to select the best of the lot.

you're thinking with the wrong head!!!