Sheesh I can't believe the hostility of this thread. Paladin posted the criteria of what he thought made women attractive. Apparently he likes women who are very, very thin, since not even Cindy Crawford (5'9" and 135lbs) fits the criteria.
In fact, most celebrity sex symbols aren't thin enough to meet Paladin's criteria. Pamela Anderson, Carmen Electra, Jennifer Lopez, Kathy Ireland, Laetitia Costa, and Britany Spears and a very long list of others, don't measure up either. Even a few actresses who've been criticized for being too thin, like Jennifer Aniston (5'4" & 110lbs.) are bigger than the numbers he posted. We're in good company ladies.
I'm all for SP's keeping themselves svelte and in shape, but the point I, and several others have tried to make is that those numbers are going too far. I don't think there's any jealosy involved here. I was model for 6 years. I was 105 lbs. on my 5'7" frame. I could fairly easily starve myself down to that weight again, but why? I looked like hell at that weight. I get a lot more attention from men now when I go out than I did then. Maybe it's because I finally have boobs. LOL
When I worked at the ranch, there were girls of all sizes and shapes. Men picked girls out of a line up, so it was easy to see what body shapes were the most popular. The super thin girls were no busier than than the slightly chubby girls. The girls who were in shape and at their ideal weight were the most popular. In fact breast size and hair seemed to have more of an effect on a girls income than fat %. So who cares if Paladin wants Ally Mc Beal? There are plenty of men, in fact the vast majority, who just want someone who meets their ideal weight, not over or under.