It is the ONLY relevant quote from the article.If I may add one relevant quote from the article :
"NOTE FROM THE EDITORS: This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. .... Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors."
If I may offer a link to scientific analysis back-up by UL tests: http://www.debunking911.com/fires.htm
There has been speculation on the initial condition of the fire retardant in some engineering studies but even these acknowledge the ultimate cause of the collapse. If one took a serious look at the proposal of hiding demolition charges, hijacking planes and flying them directly into the floors that have those charges, not to mention the logistics of the faked hijackings ... I'm amazed there isn't a serious discussion of the reality of Santa Claus that follows.
Sensationalist pap. <spits>





