And where do we draw the line? Will the PM have to cook for his family? Will the security bill have to be paid out of his personal pocket? Can we retroactively make all other prior PMs, regardless of political stripe, pay for the perks that come with the job? For that matter, why not make al the CEOs of every corporation pay their own bills and not have any job perks?
Taxpayers pay for Trudeau’s Nannies
- Thread starter GameBoy27
- Start date
After many years we finally have a prime minister who represents ALL Canadians and thinks of us as part of the human race. A true humanist. Are we really gonna impale him with trivial bullshit???
There seem to be two types of people in the world , the ones who get the big picture and the trivial, religious, every man for himself types. The later really make me give up hope !!!
There seem to be two types of people in the world , the ones who get the big picture and the trivial, religious, every man for himself types. The later really make me give up hope !!!
Straight from the previously mentioned spin doctor kate purchase (peter mancrush's buddy).
After being exposed as a fraud and hypocrite they decide to "adjust" the staff levels so the taxpayers are not out any "additional" money.
Translation - in addition to being nannies - they will also have to do the additional work that the maids did previously. All for $11-20 per hour. A true humanist? lol
Look I wouldn't have cared ( there has to be some perqs with this jobs) but to campaign against this type of thing and then do it yourself has soon as you are elected? That shows how much you can trust his promises.
Trying to change the channel? What the likes of you don't get is that this is not about money or nannies. It's about credibility. This is all on Justin and no one else.
S
**Sophie**
If it wasn't for stupid or uniformed voters Trudeau would have never won. He is the most unqualified prime minister we have very had. 2007 a snow board instructor, 2008 part time drama teacher, 2015 prime minister.
Looks like you have forgotten who brought out the ridiculous gun laws back in the early 90's . I'll give you a hint . The party starts with a L . Canada is back . Not a chance . Canada just took 2 steps backwards .
I'll bet your one of the people that voted for Wynne considering the alternatives you had . How's that working out for you ???
And hows Alberta tar sands,no Keystone pipeline,zero growth economically,MikeDuffy and C36 work for you???
Just because he's doing that doesn't make it right Sophie. The taxpayer should not be stuck for paying round the clock nanny care.
It's like a former sales agent in my company. She went to a trade show out of town and stayed with friends instead of renting a hotel room. When she submitted her expense report to me it had a huge dinner bill included - lobster, caviar, fine wine the whole nine yards. Her rationale - well I saved the company x amount of $ by staying at a friend's place for 3 nights. Needless to say I excluded the expense from her report. And she was relieved of her duties a short time thereafter.
I wonder if it really is a taxable employee benefit.
If so, no problem.
If it's a policy available to ALL Prime Ministers, then I suppose I won't argue either.
Probably true. I'm going to grin and bear it for a few years. The price of getting rid of Harper, who is NOT a progressive conservative.
