Taxpayers pay for Trudeau’s Nannies

MattRoxx

Call me anti-fascist
Nov 13, 2011
6,745
3
0
I get around.
And as I said before, Rona Ambrose (and Postmedia) still appear to have no idea what went wrong with the Conservative party and campaign, what matters to Canadians, and how to change in order to possibly succeed.

Do Conservatives Understand Why They Lost?http://ipolitics.ca/2015/12/03/do-the-conservatives-understand-yet-why-they-lost/
As any recovering addict will tell you, the first step towards getting clean is admitting you have a problem.
By that measure, the Conservative Party of Canada is still deep in the throes of withdrawal — and the addiction to absolute power is the hardest habit of all to kick. Their thrashing on October 19 came about because of what they did with that power — that, and the fact that they allowed their party to become a cult led by a man who diminished them all. The lesson clearly hasn’t sunk in.

How else can one explain the fact that there are still people in and around the party denying the need for change, and doing the revisionist history thing on the Harper years — Steve as a bright star in the Conservative firmament. Or, as Wayne Gretzky described the former PM, “one of the greatest.” Dreck.
The truth — and it’s a hard truth Conservatives are going to have to get past, if they want to get anywhere at all — is that Harper was one of the worst prime ministers this country has ever seen. The main problem with the Harperless Conservatives is that the interim leadership has gone to someone just as unrepentant about the Harper years as Steve is himself.

Rona Ambrose (and almost all of the full-time leadership hopefuls) sat around the cabinet table for every bum decision that was made — from deceiving Canadians about the cost of the F-35 fighter jet to abandoning the environment file. Ambrose does not represent renewal. She represents the same dead-end gang that Canadians rejected with glee.
 

MattRoxx

Call me anti-fascist
Nov 13, 2011
6,745
3
0
I get around.
worst. thread. ever.
I know! The economy, jobs, environment, ISIS, crime, refugee crisis, corporate welfare and tax evasion, cannabis legalization....let's ignore those trivial matters and focus on the much more important distinction of job responsibilities between $15/hr housekeepers vs nannies.

Making this an important issue is what's going to turn around the fortunes of both the Conservative party and their propaganda tool Postmedia LOL.

 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,651
5,623
113
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bev_Oda
It was $16.
Conservatives really suck at numbers. But you bring up a good point: Bev Oda had a history of gouging taxpayers and living high off the hog (ie, committing fraud against taxpayers) and no one in the ruling Conservative party had a problem with it.
See. Each side is happy to play the gotcha game. But I don't fixate. Not on if I can. Sometimes it does piss me off. And Bev Oda was one that did too.

I couldn't bother to Google the exact dollar amount of the nefarious OJ. That is was overpriced in an overpriced hotel was enough.

But Justin has been touted as a different politician. (as they all seem to be touted)

All this proves is he isn't any better right?
 

Titalian

No Regrets
Nov 27, 2012
8,490
9
0
Everywhere
I don't actually have a problem with taxpayers footing the bill. But after he stated during his campaign that rich families like his and former prime minister Stephen Harper’s didn’t need taxpayers’ help, what does he do? He hires taxpayer funded nannies. That makes him a hypocrite!
We voted in a man, who has children in the house. What is the issue here ??? Fuk I can't believe I'm reading this BS. Most of you are grasping at straws GROW UP.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
28,421
9,514
113
Room 112
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bev_Oda
It was $16.
Conservatives really suck at numbers. But you bring up a good point: Bev Oda had a history of gouging taxpayers and living high off the hog (ie, committing fraud against taxpayers) and no one in the ruling Conservative party had a problem with it.
That is not true. Many in the party had an issue with it but the problem was overall that she was a competent minister and a female Japanese Canadian which was good optics for the party. But after the Savoy incident they had no choice but to remove her from cabinet. She resigned just ahead of the planned cabinet shuffle.
 

lucky_blue

New member
Nov 23, 2010
748
0
0
Brian Mulroney classified his nannies as maids during his time in office.
Yes - that may be true. I don't recall ever saying that these blood sucking parasites are confined only to the Liberal party - it's just that it seems to be the norm for liberals to benefit at the expense of other people.

The welfare state encourages people to ignore, to violate–even to pretend does not exist–the moral principle that it is wrong to live at other people’s expense.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
28,421
9,514
113
Room 112
We voted in a man, who has children in the house. What is the issue here ??? Fuk I can't believe I'm reading this BS. Most of you are grasping at straws GROW UP.
The issue is he makes $330,000 per year base salary plus extensive benefits. He should be paying for his own child care like every other Canadian. He chose the role knowing that it required extensive travel for himself, and occasionally his spouse. That being said I have no problem with subsidizing his nannies when he and Sophie are away on official business representing Canada.
 

trippingwalker

Well-known member
Apr 1, 2015
481
302
63
I know! The economy, jobs, environment, ISIS, crime, refugee crisis, corporate welfare and tax evasion, cannabis legalization....let's ignore those trivial matters and focus on the much more important distinction of job responsibilities between $15/hr housekeepers vs nannies.

Making this an important issue is what's going to turn around the fortunes of both the Conservative party and their propaganda tool Postmedia LOL.


exactly my point. cheers!
 

lucky_blue

New member
Nov 23, 2010
748
0
0
exactly my point. cheers!
Imagine what the chart would look like for the CBC (Liberal propaganda tool - if it were a publicly listed company) and it lost it's billion dollar plus taxpayer subsidy. Instead Trudeau II bribes them with a promise of an extra $150 million if he wins the election. It is truly disgusting.
 

Titalian

No Regrets
Nov 27, 2012
8,490
9
0
Everywhere
The issue is he makes $330,000 per year base salary plus extensive benefits. He should be paying for his own child care like every other Canadian. He chose the role knowing that it required extensive travel for himself, and occasionally his spouse. That being said I have no problem with subsidizing his nannies when he and Sophie are away on official business representing Canada.
Douglas I really don't give a shit. Is this the only thing you can up with, to try and destroy this guys reputation. Man, talk about cheap.
 

lucky_blue

New member
Nov 23, 2010
748
0
0
It is an employment benefit. Claiming that the employment benefits of any government employee are tax benefits is stupid beyond belief. Dumber than petrified wood. An employment benefit has nothing to do with tax policy or social programs.

Really you make yourself into a figure of fun: what are we to conclude from this thread, that conservative voters are dumber than fence posts? Can't tell the difference between an employment benefit and a tax benefit???
How many employers cover the cost of two nannies for an employee? It is a fraction of a fraction of 1%. Trudeau II is not a one percenter but a 0.1 percenter.
 

lucky_blue

New member
Nov 23, 2010
748
0
0
Douglas I really don't give a shit. Is this the only thing you can up with, to try and destroy this guys reputation. Man, talk about cheap.
What reputation? Snowboard instructor or theater teacher? Seriously - you think this guy is qualified to be the Prime Minister of Canada?



 
Last edited:

lucky_blue

New member
Nov 23, 2010
748
0
0
A lot better than than greedy lawyers. Don't you think ?
You mean like the large number of liers/lawyers in his cabinet and members of parliament?

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/elec...ations-for-candidates-in-each-party-1.2602533

Or better than his (likely islamist) Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs ?

http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/12/is-omar-alghabra-of-canadas-liberal-party-an

Apr. 16, 2013 update: Canada's Liberal Party has elected Justin Trudeau as its leader; one press account calls Alghabra "a long-time personal friend" of his.

Dec. 2, 2015 update: Alghabra has been appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs with a focus on consular affairs. As the CBC article reporting this news explains, parliamentary secretaries "assist and represent ministers in their absence, including taking questions in the House of Commons on the minister's behalf."
 

Titalian

No Regrets
Nov 27, 2012
8,490
9
0
Everywhere

lucky_blue

New member
Nov 23, 2010
748
0
0
I believe your paranoid, I'll leave it at that. ;)
lol - I'm paranoid for posting a link from Daniel Pipes?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Pipes

Tashbih Sayyed, former editor of the Muslim World Today and the Pakistan Times (not the Pakistani newspaper of the same name), stated about Pipes, "He must be listened to. If there is no Daniel Pipes, there is no source for America to learn to recognize the evil which threatens it... Muslims in America that are like Samson; they have come into the temple to pull down the pillars, even if it means destroying themselves." Similarly, Ahmed Subhy Mansour, a former visiting fellow at Harvard Law School, writes, "We Muslims need a thinker like Dr. Pipes, who can criticize the terrorist culture within Islam."

Well about 280 million people have been killed by islamic jihadis since Muhammad started the jihad in 624 AD.

The Liberal party has been openly courting the Islamist vote for more than a decade. Big difference between opening your eyes to reality and being paranoid.

 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,651
5,623
113
Lets give him a couple of years at the least. NO? Lets see what happens.
Funny, I remember people saying the exact same thing about Harper........

Do I think he will ruin the nation? No. The nation is far stronger than one man.

But if I don't agree with his foreign policy decisions, his Environmental decisions, his taxation policy. I will speak up.

And if I don't agree with him talking out of one side of his mouth on child care and then the other on the subject of his own then I will speak to that as well.
 
Toronto Escorts