Protecting women from male abuse is a valid government function.Unlike you, I don't think the government should be trying to control everything.
Protecting women from male abuse is a valid government function.Unlike you, I don't think the government should be trying to control everything.
What next, you gonna say the government should come down on hobbying?Protecting women from male abuse is a valid government function.
Protecting them from what, exactly?The whole pitch is NOT based on "protecting women's sports". It's about protecting women who happen to be playing in sports for women. The byproduct is that the integrity of women's sports is protected.
You're overthinking this and it shows.
That's what you think your argument was saying?What part of the "take" is sexist?
The most successful professional sports leagues are popular because men pay money to watch sports.
In what way?There is no implication. The argument is clear. Transwomen should not participate in women's sports because it negatively affects female athletes.
Male domination and injury.Protecting them from what, exactly?
It's supporting evidence for the argument.That's what you think your argument was saying?
Male domination and injury.In what way?
What does hobbying have to do with men in women's sports?What next, you gonna say the government should come down on hobbying?
Ahh...Protecting women from male abuse is a valid government function.
Playing in sport is fine.Ahh...
So playing in sport is abuse now?
How is it a civil rights violation?Playing in sport is fine.
Men playing in women's sport is a civil rights violation.
This issue is not nearly as complicated as you seem to think it is.
Are you finished trolling?How is it a civil rights violation?
That's an interesting approach, and presumably why you want the Federal government involved.
There is a much larger section of the population that thinks hobbying is abusive to women.What does hobbying have to do with men in women's sports?
I think that what two consenting adults do in privacy is fundamentally different than what's being discussed here.There is a much larger section of the population that thinks hobbying is abusive to women.
Do you think that means they should be able to shut down hobbying?
For most of the population, that's a way more important issue.
You don't think human trafficking is a bigger issue than trans women in sports?I think that what two consenting adults do in privacy is fundamentally different than what's being discussed here.
Hobbying does not equal human trafficking. You're conflating subjects.You don't think human trafficking is a bigger issue than trans women in sports?
I'm saying that more of the population would likely argue that you and your hobbying is more of a threat to women than trans women in sports.Hobbying does not equal human trafficking. You're conflating subjects.
Do you have data on this or is this just your hunch?I'm saying that more of the population would likely argue that you and your hobbying is more of a threat to women than trans women in sports.
In the US, which of those two things are illegal?Do you have data on this or is this just your hunch?
We do know surveys say that more than 80% of the population is opposed to trans in women's sports.
Again the two things are not comparable, anyway. One has to do with fair competition. The other has to do with sexual activities between two consenting adults.
Stop changing the subject.In the US, which of those two things are illegal?
Stop changing the subject.
Same subject, just trying to figure out why you think women would be more upset about trans women in sports than hobbyists.Stop changing the subject.
Does that mean you don't have an answer?Are you finished trolling?