And yet still more popular than PeePee or MAGA here.By the end of his tenure he was about as popular as a pork chop at a Jewish wedding. Even worse than when Mulroney left office.
And yet still more popular than PeePee or MAGA here.By the end of his tenure he was about as popular as a pork chop at a Jewish wedding. Even worse than when Mulroney left office.
And all at the expense of Canadians ! This just shows what an absolute stupid cunt you are !! Your life has gone to shit here in this liberal wasteland and your happy as long as the libtards have power
You can’t make this shit up
Wow, you're on fire today! Everything ok??? LOLWhat’s wrong with a whites only community
Non of you liberal faggots seem to care about Brampton the toilet of Ontario ??
savage Muslims wanted to build a Muslim only town in Texas not a wors correct
We as Caucasians should be protecting our daughters from these rapist animals
But when Mulroney was booted out, Liberals won. When Harper was booted out Liberals won. Justin left, Liberals won.By the end of his tenure he was about as popular as a pork chop at a Jewish wedding. Even worse than when Mulroney left office.
You're getting confused again.Trudeau is exactly where he should be, on a boat with Katy perry, called Katy and the ferry.
this is interestingGraphs like this are misleading.
In the USA there is a big difference between average wage and median wage. Average US wage is high because of the dispropritionate number of billionaires and hundred millionaires in that country.
The US median wage is comparable to the Canadian median wage especially when you factor in a PPP adjustment and the universal health care adjustment. ChatGPT (if it is accurate) reports that the US median wage is $62,000 USD and the Canadian median wage is $60,000 USD.
Having said that, I believe that Justin Trudeau was objectively the worst Prime Minister that Canada has ever had.
how long do you think Canada can afford universal health care?The US median wage is comparable to the Canadian median wage especially when you factor in a PPP adjustment and the universal health care adjustment.
The only industrialized country in the world that can't afford universal health care is america.this is interesting
how long do you think Canada can afford universal health care?
Him being on a boat means he's not prime minister anymore.You're getting confused again.
Which is it, are you upset that you think Trudeau is having a good time or that he's gay?
Interestingly, DDDLover can no longer be found here. I think we need to remember that we must refrain from racist remarks and ad hominem attacks.WHOA, Jimmy, calling someone a stupid cunt is a huge no-no!!!
DUDE, how many times do you want to rebrand???? Come on, man, control yourself.
PS...I did fantastically under Justin, and I will do fantastically with Supercarney, who was handpicked by Justin to carry the Liberal flag once again.
pss...if it's so bad here you need to get out of this wasteland. I'm sure Florida has everything you need and a few oranges a day might calm you down.
Wow, you're on fire today! Everything ok??? LOL
The only industrialized country in the world that can't afford universal health care is america.
explain
So now you're happy for him?Him being on a boat means he's not prime minister anymore.![]()
So you think we should have elected the guy who spends the most in parliament instead of the banker because you were worried about the budget?what is wrong with you ?
i just explained why we will not be able to afford universal health care
the budget does not balance itself and there will be a cost to Canadians for electing fools who think budgets balance themselves
Well, if I remember Macroeconomics correctly GDP=comsumption+capital investment+government spending+net export. U.S. government is a smaller part of economy then in other countries, U.S. imports is more than exports, so, the only ways GDP can go to are consumption and investment. Billionaires consume a very small portion of their income, and investment means future economic growth and higher consumption. So, just from the aggregate data, regular American Joe consumes more than Australian Mike.GDP per capita is not entirely an useful metric when assessing the economic well-being of a population.
GDP per capita measures economic output per person, not wealth or income distribution.
The United States has a higher number of billionaires and greater income inequality than Canada, which skews the mean upward.
As a result, GDP per capita gives an unrealistic picture of typical prosperity.
Using the median instead provides a clearer view and by that measure, the average Canadian is wealthier than the average American, even if income levels are lower in Canada.
View attachment 497859
Well, considering this thread is also about how Canadian debt will destroy the country, how does this figure in?Well, if I remember Macroeconomics correctly GDP=comsumption+capital investment+government spending+net export. U.S. government is a smaller part of economy then in other countries, U.S. imports is more than exports, so, the only ways GDP can go to are consumption and investment. Billionaires consume a very small portion of their income, and investment means future economic growth and higher consumption. So, just from the aggregate data, regular American Joe consumes more than Australian Mike.
Him being on a boat means he's not prime minister anymore.![]()
GDP per capita is not entirely an useful metric when assessing the economic well-being of a population.
GDP per capita measures economic output per person, not wealth or income distribution.
The United States has a higher number of billionaires and greater income inequality than Canada, which skews the mean upward.
As a result, GDP per capita gives an unrealistic picture of typical prosperity.
Using the median instead provides a clearer view and by that measure, the average Canadian is wealthier than the average American, even if income levels are lower in Canada.
View attachment 497859
You should read about how and why the great depression happened, larue.what a pile of non-sense
there has been wealth inequality since the day the first cave man had an apple and the second cave man did not
the second caveman had a choice, demand/ fight for half the apple or walk a mile to the apple tree
gdp / cavemen = one apple /two cavemen
or
gdp / cavemen = two apples /two cavemen
there is no question which scenario is best for all and creates the most wealth / prosperity
we live in a capitalist society
capitalism means you have to compete
the desire to compete is embedded in our DNA
you can not change human nature
now pay attention
you will never , ever eliminate inequality and will cause much damage by trying to force it onto others
View attachment 498324
the us gdp is dominated by the consumerWell, if I remember Macroeconomics correctly GDP=comsumption+capital investment+government spending+net export. U.S. government is a smaller part of economy then in other countries, U.S. imports is more than exports, so, the only ways GDP can go to are consumption and investment. Billionaires consume a very small portion of their income, and investment means future economic growth and higher consumption. So, just from the aggregate data, regular American Joe consumes more than Australian Mike.
Happy for all of us.So now you're happy for him?
You are confusing aggregate consumption (GDP is aggregate) with average individual wealth.Well, if I remember Macroeconomics correctly GDP=comsumption+capital investment+government spending+net export. U.S. government is a smaller part of economy then in other countries, U.S. imports is more than exports, so, the only ways GDP can go to are consumption and investment. Billionaires consume a very small portion of their income, and investment means future economic growth and higher consumption. So, just from the aggregate data, regular American Joe consumes more than Australian Mike.