No.What has Trump got to do with people breaking the law? didn't they arrest the people that broke the law and release those who didn't?
Sure part of trial but have you seen the video without the editing and the edited one? You can share your input on it once you see both.No.
They've been systematically going through cases for years now.
Not everyone has been arrested, from what I understand and of course everyone arrested wasn't charged and everyone charged wasn't arrested.
All quite normal.
As for what Trump had to do with it, that's still part of his trial, now isn't it?
I do suspect short clips are easier to monetize.Nope, not even close for me. Again, a lot of clips about people talking about the interview.
First, I still think it's possible there is a business reason based on Google's terms with sharing Spotify clips. Do they make more money from people watching the post-interview analysis?
Second, maybe Google knows you are a liberal when you search so they're like "WTH this guy won't be voting for Trump".![]()
My indifference stems from the hyperbole that the last three USA elections democracy is on the line. It wasn't. That USA policy would drastically change. It didn't.I do like you admitting again for the people who forgot that you don't actually care about any of this.
But good - we've settled you have no evidence for your position and who wins the election won't provide that evidence.
Also it doesn't matter, because you don't care anyway.
We are all quite devoted to Alanis Morrisette.....our ironic queen.What is it with Canadians and the word ironic?
Have I watched ALL the video of January 6th in existence?Sure part of trial but have you seen the video without the editing and the edited one? You can share your input on it once you see both.
I'm talking about the Jan 6 video of Trump's spliced video of him "inciting insurrection" and then the full video of it without edit...maybe you should.Have I watched ALL the video of January 6th in existence?
No.
I'm thinking this story has outrun its 15 minutes of fame.From one of the horses' mouth, take his perspective on Harris' effort to do his show for what its worth.
People are talking about it and you know, they still might make it happen.I'm thinking this story has outrun its 15 minutes of fame.
I'm sure both candidates solicit and turn down numerous venues in the course of a campaign. Why would this be any different??
Just for those who might want to watch, he goes off about political tribalism later and never gets back to the Harris question, so when that happens you can tap out if you want. (Or listen, it's a clear enough summation of his thinking about that issue.)From one of the horses' mouth, take his perspective on Harris' effort to do his show for what its worth.
The last eight years affected me quite a bit, actually.Just like you are not any more important to the process, also continue to live a comfortable life, and the last eight years didn't affect you at all.
It's different just because of the size and importance of Rogan's podcast.I'm thinking this story has outrun its 15 minutes of fame.
I'm sure both candidates solicit and turn down numerous venues in the course of a campaign. Why would this be any different??
It's amazing, Trump turned down a second debate due to fear and that is ok but not reaching an agreement for a Joe Rogan podcast is a big sin. LOL That being said, I would have enjoyed watching her on the podcast.I'm thinking this story has outrun its 15 minutes of fame.
I'm sure both candidates solicit and turn down numerous venues in the course of a campaign. Why would this be any different??
What was the debate in July? A qualifier?It's amazing, Trump turned down a second debate due to fear and that is ok but not reaching an agreement for a Joe Rogan podcast is a big sin. LOL That being said, I would have enjoyed watching her on the podcast.
Yes, I've seen both.I'm talking about the Jan 6 video of Trump's spliced video of him "inciting insurrection" and then the full video of it without edit...maybe you should.
I don't think it's a big sin. I think this late in the game there is little to gain and much to lose for her. If she had done it a few months ago I could have helped. Now it smacks of desperation. And I think the demographics of the audience wouldn't favor her, but the argument could be made a lot of not regular listeners would have tuned in. And the clips depending.It's amazing, Trump turned down a second debate due to fear and that is ok but not reaching an agreement for a Joe Rogan podcast is a big sin. LOL That being said, I would have enjoyed watching her on the podcast.