Violence against Muslims continues in America

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Meanwhile, violence against Muslims continues in Iraq.

Here is a quote from an imman: "Muslims have more rights and freedom in Canada than they do in any Islamic country."
How many rights and freedoms do they have in Christian Zimbabwe?

By the way, the world's most populous Muslim country is a democracy and generally regarded as a free country by, say, the US based Freedom House. Canada is right up there at the top--quite a standard to hold up, but there are a few Muslim countries that are quite free.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,876
6,017
113
How many rights and freedoms do they have in Christian Zimbabwe?

By the way, the world's most populous Muslim country is a democracy and generally regarded as a free country by, say, the US based Freedom House. Canada is right up there at the top--quite a standard to hold up, but there are a few Muslim countries that are quite free.
You are not seriously trying to suggest that as a general rule non-Muslims enjoy the same religious rights and freedoms in Muslim countries as Muslims enjoy in non-Musulin countries are you?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
You are not seriously trying to suggest that as a general rule non-Muslims enjoy the same religious rights and freedoms in Muslim countries as Muslims enjoy in non-Musulin countries are you?
I'm saying it depends on the country. Non Muslims enjoy considerable rights and freedoms in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Turkey. Indonesia in particular is rated highly by Freedom House, for example, and as the most populous Muslim country that should count for something.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
By the way, the world's most populous Muslim country is a democracy and generally regarded as a free country
Are you talking about Indonesia? If you are, I'll hit you with some facts about how "great" (sarcastic "great") life is for non-Muslims (or even Muslims) there.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
28,803
9,941
113
Room 112
Not even close to being the #1 target? They are the #2 target. Unlike you I am capable of expressing my disgust at both anti-semitism and anti-Muslim bigotry. The anti-Muslim bigotry is on the rise, and it is generated by a bunch of hate-mongering fear-propaganda that is promoted in the media and in the popular culture. Statements like post #21 in this thread contribute to it, just as people like Groggy here post statements that contribute to the anti-semitism that is rampant.

Is it OK for me to be disgusted by both? Review my posting history. I don't think I'm going to be accused of going easy on the anti-semites.
Do you purposefully try to be an asshole fuji or does it just come naturally?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
You should analyze your hate crime statistics a little more closely, kratz. Muslims make up a little over half a percent of the US population--yet from your own statistic they were the victims of 13% of religiously motivated hate crimes. A little grade-school math says they are 22 times more likely than the average American to be a victim of a religious hate crime. For the record Jews make up a little over 2% of the US population and were the victims of 65% of the religious hate crimes, making them about 32 times more likely than average to be a victim of a religious hate crime.

Is it your view that the hate crimes against Muslims aren't so bad, because Jews are getting it even worse? That's a little twisted.

A better question is why are these two religious minorities being singled out for so much of the hate crime?
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
A better question is why are these two religious minorities being singled out for so much of the hate crime?
Goldman Sachs in one case and suicide bombers in the other case.

P.S. Is it true that most hate crimes against Jews are committed by Muslims?
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
Let's try statistics and objective ratings over anecdote.
Indonesia's conversion to the Muslim version of democracy is very recent and has a long way to go before it is even remotely close to Western democracies. It wasn't that long ago when they were killing their Chinese civilians and stealing their businesses as well as killing people in East Timor and only stopped when the Aussies stepped in.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Indonesia's conversion to the Muslim version of democracy is very recent and has a long way to go before it is even remotely close to Western democracies.
You're right, it's unfair to compare developing nations to developed ones. So let's do an apples-to-apples compare and look only at developing nations, say only at nations with a GDP lower than about $22k per capita (i.e., less developed than Portugal).

I think Indonesia, Malaysia, and Turkey look pretty good on that apples-to-apples comparison, don't you?
 

Czar

Well-known member
Nov 19, 2004
1,315
221
63
Your error is lumping all Muslims together. It's adherents of a couple of particular sects that commit the violence. Most Muslims do not belong to denominations that commit violence. It's quite plausible that you weren't aware of that, but now you have a choice--you've been given that information, you can update your views to reflect it, or you can choose to be willfully ignorant.
Too Bad Fuji but I am not in error. The reality is this. Bring in 10,000 muslim immigrants at random and the risk of terrorism rises exponentially. Bring in 10,000 Bhuddists, Hindus etc, virtually no risk. That is just the way it is. The truth is not ignorance.

You say, adherance of a couple of sects only. I'm not sure of the accuracy but I will assume for this thread that your statement is true. The problem is that by far the most likely people to make the transition two these two sects are mainstream muslims. And the more Islam you have in a country, the more non-muslims that will convert to Islam and then go to these two sects.

Keep them out is the best bet and let in the non-terrorist groups. Nothing personal or hatred. If it were the Bhuddists doing this instead, I would be saying let the muslims in and keep the Bhuddists out.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,876
6,017
113
I'm saying it depends on the country. Non Muslims enjoy considerable rights and freedoms in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Turkey. Indonesia in particular is rated highly by Freedom House, for example, and as the most populous Muslim country that should count for something.
Turkey is constitutionally secular and i believe that the constitutions of both Malaysia and Indonesia guarantee freedom of religion. Although all of those countries are predominantly Muslim they are not Muslim countries.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Czar you are ignorant, but rather than filling in your ignorance with learning you have filled it in with bigoted assumption. Show me your empirical evidence that mainstream muslims are likely to give up their beliefs and convert to a more radical denomination? If you have no such evidence, if as I suspect you're just making that up as you go, then recognize your lack of knowledge and try educating yourself before making any more such bigoted assumptions.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Turkey is constitutionally secular and i believe that the constitutions of both Malaysia and Indonesia guarantee freedom of religion. Although all of those countries are predominantly Muslim they are not Muslim countries.
Fine, but only if you agree that Canada, the United States, France, etc., cannot be counted as "non Muslim" countries by the same logic. Malaysia by the way is formally and officially a Muslim state, but does guarantee freedom of religion just as Israel does while being a Jewish state.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,876
6,017
113
Fine, but only if you agree that Canada, the United States, France, etc., cannot be counted as "non Muslim" countries by the same logic. Malaysia by the way is formally and officially a Muslim state, but does guarantee freedom of religion just as Israel does while being a Jewish state.
LOL. I have no idea what that means. Do you mean that if I do not agree then Canada, the US and France are Muslim countries.

I believe that freedom of religion is constitutionally guaranteed in Malaysia.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
LOL. I have no idea what that means. Do you mean that if I do not agree then Canada, the US and France are Muslim countries.

I believe that freedom of religion is constitutionally guaranteed in Malaysia.
I'm pointing out that there are problems with your way of defining "Muslim country". If a country is not a "Muslim country" unless its constitution says so, even though it is overwhelmingly Muslim populated, then presumably the same logic means a country cannot be a "non Muslim" country unless its constitution says it is non Muslim. Canada, the US, Indonesia, Turkey, Malaysia, and Israel would all be examples of countries that are neither Muslim nor non-Muslim by your way of defining things. We would have three categories of countries by your logic: Muslim, non-Muslim, and secular.

And as for freedom of religion in Malaysia yes it is constitutionally guaranteed--in a Muslim country! And respected too. And yes, Malaysia's constitution declares that it is an Islamic state.

I generally hold up Malaysia as an example of hypocrisy on the part of the likes of Groggy, as I have never heard him express any outrage that Malaysia is an Islamic state, nor have I seen him going about asserting that it is an apartheid state, or that by definition it cannot be a democracy since it declares itself to be Islamic. Like Israel, Malaysia guarantees religious freedoms, but at the same time has policies that promote Islam (without disparaging or limiting other religions).
 
Toronto Escorts