Sorry I said you were 40 years behind the curve. You are now getting us close to 100 years behind the curve. This chap you are writing about now served in the civil war and was dead by 1919. He was not a historical scholar of any sort. And most importantly DID NOT DENY THE EXISTENCE OF HISTORICAL JESUS.
You really are dishonest and desparate arn't you?
Because in fact if you quoted properly you would know your source believed that Christ was a historical figure.
If you had a hint of honour or honesty, you would be ashamed for your shenninigans.