Will Bush Bomb Iran

Will Bush Bomb Iran

  • probably Yes - that's the plan and they intend to execute

    Votes: 99 53.8%
  • Probably No - the plan is a negotiating tactic

    Votes: 85 46.2%

  • Total voters
    184

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,530
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
assoholic said:
..well you're the expert.

and you fancy yourself a dancer too. But the sidestep shuffle taint much of a dance
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
neversayno said:
BIASED , BIASED , BIASED , another manipulation by basketcase :rolleyes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_Accuracy_in_Middle_East_Reporting_in_America

CAMERA is a member of the Israel Campus Roundtable, which includes the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Anti-Defamation League, The David Project Center for Jewish Leadership, and other pro-Israel organizations. As a member of this Campus Roundtable, CAMERA operates on college campuses to combat what it perceives as "propagandistic assaults on Israel . . . creating harmful misperceptions of Israel" and "publishes a student-focused magazine, CAMERA on Campus, containing specialized information useful in countering misinformation."[5]


Charles Jacobs (political activist) founder of CAMERA
founded The David Project Center for Jewish Leadership (2002), which he heads.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Jacobs_(political_activist)
So what exactly in this post refutes the fact that the Sharon quotes are fake? The group has a pro-Israel and anti-antisemitic focus but that does nothing to show their claims as false. The only thing that this shows is the site is run by Jews. Do you think that makes them liars?


Sergei said:
How typical of someone who has no rational arguments - resorting to personal insults is lowly. Did I call you names? You seem to fall into the category of people who think that anyone who has the guts to disagree with anything Israel does must be evil and a bad bad man. I'm not against the existence of Israel buddy. As a matter of fact, I highly respect the jewish contribution to world culture, especially in the fields of classical music and literature.

If you sit there and quote jewish sources and someone else quotes arab sources, where will that lead? Nowhere. Anybody can "google" anything he wants and find something to support his angle. How do you know that what you repeat is true? Were you there? No, you're just choosing to believe the crap that suits you, that's all. No matter what anyone tells you, you'll interpret it in a pro-Israel way. I read a couple of quotes, to me they appear to be genuine, I typed them, that's all. I could type you a quotation from a book I have by Benjamin Disraeli which doesn't sound very nice, but what for, you'll just "google" it away as a fraud. Maybe the book was written by some savage like Mengele under a pseudonym. Maybe I'm just making it up. Maybe it was Ahmadinejad posing as Disraeli. You'll find something, I'm sure.

Unfortunately you seem to have the same theory as George W: If a person doesn't adopt your line of thinking 100% then he's your enemy. That was not my intention. I'm not muslim, nor Arab, nor anti-jewish.

As far as the other thread goes, I can assure you that I have an entire file on that subject.
First, in this thread, you posted those quotes as fact. I have provided a sourced document saying that the quotes are b.s. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? If the quotes were true, you should be able to find some original source documents to show that.

In another thread, you posted that Kuwait has no history of independance and I refuted that with what an encyclopedia says.

Put these together and it is clear that despite your claims of neutrality and knowing facts, the "truths" you have posted are not so. If the sources I posted are made up, please post some evidence (Enclyclopedia Britanica is known for their falsehoods aren't they?) instead of trying do divert the attention from your obtusification.


And yes, I am far more likely to believe a site where they use direct source information and have clearly shown what their research is than to believe a site that refuses to provide references except from other places that refuse to provide references.

The biggest joke of your post is
How do you know that what you repeat is true? Were you there? No, you're just choosing to believe the crap that suits you, that's all...
You keep trying to bully people into believing your facts but all you are left with is trying to defend an untennable position (but I am sure you were there an personally Sharon said these things and were living in what is modern day Kuwait in the 18th century).

I (along with any rational person) will view the alleged Sharon quotes you posted as garbage until you or someone else can "use google" and show why Camera's analysis is flawed.

Until you do, I will continue to consider you a fraud. If you have such a low level of self-confidence (or confidence in your alleged facts) that you consider that an insult, so be it.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,714
98
48
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
assoholic said:
..is that why you support Bush Smerf, for once you get to talk like a big man ?
your simplistic jargon is meaningless as to what is happening in the world.
Except as an example of the simpleton that buys this garbage.
Its about Oil.
Actually, I think it's about terrorism in this case.

OTB
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
neversayno said:
YAWN !!!



YAWN !!!!



YAWN !!!

I thought you can do a better job than a source like CAMERA !

YAWN !!!!!

So now you want a refute for CAMERA source !

What was that ? say again ???
I thought you can do better than that ~

YAWN !!!!!
I am impressed with this post because you didn't just post a link but I think your rhetorical skills need a little bit of polishing, (unless you are pandering to the less educated on this board).
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,769
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Even More evidence of inordinate & massive Israeli lobby in USA

Why Did Bush Give Kristol’s Speech? PNAC is Alive and Well and They’re Taking Us to Iran and Syria!

PNAC is alive and well and living inside George W. Bush’s empty skull. All you had to do was watch a few minutes of FOX News before George W. Bush gave his speech and the grin on William Kristol’s face, (PNAC chairman who is very likely one of the insiders that brought us 9/11 or as he called it, our “new Pearl Harbor”), and you would have known that Bush was about to announce the continuation of the PNAC agenda. Kristol grinned like a little boy trying to keep a secret. But some of us know better. Some of us know that Kristol has been one of the Neocons who has helped package and sell the continuation of the PNAC foreign policy agenda.

“A new way forward” and troop “surge” are two of the laughable inaccurate terms that have been coined for this second chapter in the PNAC coup. These guys stole an election, 9/11ed us into giving them control of our military and they even sacrificed their own (Rumsfeld) in order to retain power. Tonight’s speech by George W. Bush was simply the public announcement that the Iran/Syria chapter of the PNAC remapping of the Middle East is on its way. Another element of PNAC chapter two is also under way, for those of you who are not paying attention: the part of their agenda that recommended that the US secure (steal) resources in the region is in the works because Iraq’s newly “elected” Parliament, you know the people who represent the citizens of Iraq, just decided to sign the Iraqi oil rights over to western companies. You know; the oil that Saddam used to provide free health care and education (through college) to Iraqi citizens. Now that oil revenue will go right into the pockets of the oil executives who bring us global warming, war and a wall of secrecy when it comes to any technology that could replace oil for anything.

Hey, stupid brainwashed Americans, did you know that Saddam used Iraq’s oil money to pay for health care? No; because your lying bastards in the media did not tell you this. While Saddam was providing free health care for his people your health care costs rose 70% (another fine Bush legacy) and while Iraq’s oil money also paid for Iraqis’ education, Exxon has turned in one global profit record after another!

Folks, don’t criticize this blog entry by saying things about the credibility of my blog; because the design is not professional, or because I did not provide too many links to back up my comments. Go through the hundreds of pages of the main web site where you can find thousands of linked references or get off of your butt and start Googling (you know, like that sage intellectual W says, use “the Google” on the “Internets”). Maybe after reading a few corroborated undisputed media reports from around the world you will put two and two together and join me in recognizing that we have a president who is a puppet of some very bad people who think nothing of lying to you in order to further their goals. They think nothing of killing massive numbers of people including Americans in order to further their goals and they have done just that.

Don’t be afraid to start researching this stuff because the ramifications of not doing anything will be worse than if you let the damage continue to pile up. Maybe if enough of you come to terms with what is taking place more people can actually take action. Maybe the people who are trying desperately to alert the citizens of this nation about what is going on will have one less person slowing us down from stopping the madness!

PNAC brought you 9/11, they brought you Iraq and now they are telling you that Iran and Syria are next. And guess what, I have said it time and time again but when the time comes I’ll say it again…I told you so!

So how much more do you have to see before you stop these guys? How much more do you have to see before you start believing your own eyes and ears; or do you just not trust your own eyes and ears; only those of the people who have lied to you about everything from the Gulf of Tonkin to 9/11; the criminal US corporate media? Think about it!

Reference
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,769
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Escalation Against Iran

The Pieces Are Being Put in Place

By Col. Sam Gardner

01/16/07 "Counterpunch" -- -- The pieces are moving. They’ll be in place by the end of February. The United States will be able to escalate military operations against Iran.

The second carrier strike group leaves the U.S. west coast on January 16. It will be joined by naval mine clearing assets from both the United States and the UK. Patriot missile defense systems have also been ordered to deploy to the Gulf.

Maybe as a guard against North Korea seeing operations focused on Iran as a chance to be aggressive, a squadron of F-117 stealth fighters has just been deployed to Korea.

This has to be called escalation. We have to remind ourselves, just as Iran is supporting groups inside Iraq, the United States is supporting groups inside Iran. Just as Iran has special operations troops operating inside Iraq, we’ve read the United States has special operations troops operating inside Iran.

Just as Iran is supporting Hamas, two weeks ago we found out the United States is supporting arms for Abbas. Just as Iran and Syria are supporting Hezbollah in Lebanon we’re now learning the White House has approved a finding to allow the CIA to support opposition groups inside Lebanon. Just as Iran is supporting Syria, we’ve learned recently that the United States is going to fund Syrian opposition groups.

We learned this week the President authorized an attack on the Iranian liaison office in Irbil.

The White House keeps saying there are no plans to attack Iran. Obviously, the facts suggest otherwise. Equally as clear, the Iranians will read what the Administrations is doing not what it is saying.


It is possible the White House strategy is just implementing a strategy to put pressure on Iran on a number of fronts, and this will never amount to anything. On the other hand, if the White House is on a path to strike Iran, we’ll see a few more steps unfold.

First, we know there is a National Security Council staff-led
group whose mission is to create outrage in the world against Iran. Just like before Gulf II, this media group will begin to release stories to sell a strike against Iran. Watch for the outrage stuff. The Patriot missiles going to the GCC states are only part of the missile defense assets. I would expect to see the deployment of some of the European-based missile defense assets to Israel, just as they were before Gulf II.

I would expect deployment of additional USAF fighters into the bases in Iraq, maybe some into Afghanistan.

I think we will read about the deployment of some of the newly arriving Army brigades going into Iraq being deployed to the border with Iran. Their mission will be to guard against any Iranian movements into Iraq.

As one of the last steps before a strike, we’ll see USAF tankers moved to unusual places, like Bulgaria. These will be used to refuel the US-based B-2 bombers on their strike missions into Iran. When that happens, we’ll only be days away from a strike.

The White House could be telling the truth. Maybe there are no plans to take Iran to the next level. The fuel for a fire is in place, however. All we need is a spark. The danger is that we have created conditions that could lead to a Greater Middle East War.


Sam Gardiner is a retired colonel of the US Air Force. He has taught strategy and military operations at the National War College, Air War College and Naval War College.
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0

assoholic

New member
Aug 30, 2004
1,625
0
0
..again in tonights speech, Iran, get ready it's coming.
This dumbass should be an assistant manager at a small K Mart store,
not too big.
Not POTUS.
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
assoholic said:
..again in tonights speech, Iran, get ready it's coming.
This dumbass should be an assistant manager at a small K Mart store,
not too big.
Not POTUS.
LMGDAO!...nice touch with the "not too big" part. :p oh man!
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
Empires collapse... http://www.counterpunch.org/sale02222005.html

[SIZE=-1] So far that military network has not collapsed, but as Iraq indicates it is mightily tested and quite incapable of establishing client states to do our bidding and protect resources we need. And as anti-American sentiment continues to spread and darken-in all the Muslim countries, in much of Europe, in much of Asia-and as more countries refuse the "structural adjustments" that our IMF-led globalization requires, it is quite likely that the periphery of our empire will begin resisting our dominance, militarily if necessary. And far from having a capacity to fight two wars simultaneously, as the Pentagon once hoped, we are proving that we can't even fight one.

[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Finally, domestic dissent and upheaval. Traditional empires end up collapsing from within as well as often being attacked from without, and so far the level of dissent within the U.S. has not reached the point of rebellion or secession-thanks both to the increasing repression of dissent and escalation of fear in the name of "homeland security" and to the success of our modern version of bread and circuses, a unique combination of entertainment, sports, television, internet sex and games, consumption, drugs, liquor, and religion that effectively deadens the general public into stupor. But the tactics of the Bush II administration show that it is so fearful of an expression of popular dissent that it is willing to defy and ignore environmental, civil-rights, and progressive groups, to bribe commentators to put out its propaganda, to expand surveillance and data-base invasions of privacy, to use party superiority and backroom tactics to ride roughshod over Congressional opposition, to use lies and deceptions as a normal part of government operations, to break international laws and treaties for short-term ends, and to use religion to cloak its every policy.[/SIZE]
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,769
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
bbking said:
Your dreaming - ties with Putin's Russia make Iran not likely a US target. Bombing supply shipments as they enter Iraq, a different story as is a few wayward munitions - all out war nope.


bbk
Well on paper that looks nice and safe.
However the US won't hit Iran because Israel will be given that job.
Remember Israel went to war with Lebanon over two soldiers being 'kidnapped', so who knows what 'incident' has been concocted as a pretext for Israel to hit Iran.

All out war, is never really planned, it just escalates step by tragic step.
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
The world is Bush's sandbox.
He's playing soldier now, with his PNAC buddies.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
bbking said:
... Israel's action also damaged Hezbollah's power within the current Government of Lebanon as that Government now oversees and interferes with Hezbollah in the south - why else is Hezbollah so busy in overthrowing the current Government in Beirut.
...
It seems most people missed the significance of this summers war against Hezbollah - while some see Israels pullback and current internal political strain as weakness or a loss - I see a political masterstroke that gives Iran a chance to step back from the brink.
...
Uhh, we are often on the same side of debates here but I can't see eye to eye with you on this. At least in the public eye, Hezbollah won this summer. As a result they felt that they had the political clout to effectively control Lebanese politics. Even after weeks of protests that have accomplished nothing, Nasrallah still thinks he can take down the government.

Yes, Iran knows that the Israelis will respond heavily but they also know that Hezbollah and likely Hamas would still be able to inflict enough harm to make it worthwhile.

As for provocations, nothing less than a direct attack from Iran on Israel or a nuclear deonation facilitated by Hez/Ham will precipitate an actual war.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,769
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
bbking said:
I really got a kick out of you Wood and others that somehow thought Israel lost that fight last summer - if you think about it, it was a very easy way to send to send a message to Iran and the rest of the world.
bbk
I don't think Israel lost last summer. I feel there were no winners or losers in that Lebanese Debacle.
Israeli neocons staged their own 'Shock & Awe' version in Lebanon using two captured soldiers as the pretext for going in. After an initial success IDF bogged down into a stalemate. Saner minds in Israeli government looked across the border into Iraq and realized they don't have the resources to waste, money, time and Israeli lives, in their Lebanon Debacle as Dubya is doing in his Iraq Debacle. So Israel declared victory, abandoned those two soldiers and pulled out of Lebanon.

It does however, as you point out, make for a dandy precedent for hitting Iran in the near future. That is unless a better 'one' is in the works.....;)
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
Actually Israel lost.
They tried to pressure the Lebanese into doing what they can't do, disarm Hezbollah.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Israel could have easily wiped out Hezbollah. There just wouldn't be more than a few dozen people alive in southern Lebanon after.
 
Toronto Escorts