It does not say anywhere.
From Flirt Spa: "Currently we fall under “personal services” and do not require full vaccination."
Will spas enforce the vaccine passport?
- Thread starter hedo rick
- Start date
From Flirt Spa: "Currently we fall under “personal services” and do not require full vaccination."
I doubt it, why would they hamper their own business if they don't have to? Also the amount of heat from anti-vaxxers for voluntarily doing so will probably discourage them. Maybe some of the more by-the-books spas like Allure or Flirt might, but I sure as hell don't think Seduction or Premier would.
TBH I think the govt likes to just pretend they don't exist, at least in any public statements, and the spas decided on their own to act like personal care. And why not? I know I always receive *very* personal care from them.
For those wondering why they wouldn't make spas do this, all the places requiring the vaccine passport involve crowds. One on one settings are safer so aren't included yet. This may change but for now I think they they don't want to go to far with this yet.
It would hamper their business in some ways, but encourage it in others. I want the risk to be as low as possible before I decide to jump back in. I want the girl I’m going to see vaccinated. I want anyone she might have seen before me to be vaccinated, too.
it doesn’t eliminate the risk, but given vaccinated people are like 5x less likely to get the virus in the first place, it’s still quite significant.
If you’re vaccinated and still this paranoid, maybe time to take a break.
If you’re so paranoid about the wife finding out what all the life savings are being spent on, maybe you should take a break.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
CDC provides credible COVID-19 health information to the U.S.
You can find the data there. It's not that riveting, but whatever floats your boat.
For a real world example though, you can just use Ontario's situation right now. 70% of Ontario is fully vaxxed, but 75-80% of our new cases are comprised of individuals who aren't fully vaxxed.
To get a better picture, they shouldn't combine people vaccinated with 1 dose and those not yet vaccinated into one "unvaccinated" group.
Who's to say the 75-80% of new cases they claim is not from people with 1 dose of a vaccine?
The split between vaccinated with 2 doses, vaccinated with 1 dose, and unvaccinated would be more helpful.
Exactly, yet drive-thrus are so busy.
Still haven't seen anyone drop on a sidewalk yet either.
Their bankers might be pretty unhappy with that kind of attitude. If the bankers don't care about the attitude, they care very much about cheque at the end of the month.
Wy would they have to be?
At the early stages of the virus, it was thought that transmission happened as the virus survived on top of items (never was there any concern about it surviving on food, especially cooked or hot food).
We now know there is zero infectious transmission from the virus when it gets on your hands or even into your mouth in ways other than through the smallest droplets being inhaled into your lungs. Anything else is simply fear mongering.
All correct, almost.
Your description of what the vaccine does and doesn't do is my understanding as well.
Where we differe is how describe the need for masking. It assumes that the 20% of unvaxinated are going to become ill, extremely ill. You forget that the majority of illness is those who lived in old age homes. They are now almost fully vaxxed. The next highest group, together adding up to well over 70% of all cases, were those over 65 with other underlying conditions. Most of them have also been vaxxed.
The remaining cases of younger adults made up 25% of the balance of cases and also had underlying conditions.
So wearing a mask is not very effective when the potential infection rate is low to begin with and the potential for being infected depends on your underlying conditions and age. Those under 18 were always highly virus resistant.
I think maskers are virtue signalers, not health warriors. Do it if you want, just don't think it's effective or make anyone else wear them, they're harmful in many ways.
In this pandemic which is increasingly pathological with the delta variant and increasingly political, we should not expect the government to pay toomuch attention to enforcing vaccine passports usage in the sex trade. Public Health struggled with even acknowledging and working with the sex trade pre-pandemic, is currently overwhelmed and is not likely to enforce actions on the hundreds of brothels across the GTA where guys boink working ladies by trailing them with QR vaccine passports.
