The NDP no longer has party status and 15 minute cities are bad for the environment.
Will you all freeze to death in the Winter for a Net Zero World?
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
it is fundamental logarithmic absorption you uneducated moron
Ask a different scientist how often logarithms and its off set exponents occur in natural science
oh wait, you might actually learn something instead of parroting a biased website
you frankfooter are an untrustworthy bullshit artist, who would claim anything to push a failed narrative
glad that armchair scientists like you know whats really going on lol. what a douche
let me guess you came up with that yourself and didnt use AI or the internet to help you.
so the density is your brain and the absorption is the shit ?
larue, where do you find these charts?
Why will you never supply the source?
Are they straight from the Heartland Institute or some 30 year old oil lobbyist site like wattsupwiththat?
You're calling NASA the bullshit artist.
I'm bring their work and research in here, not mine.
I gave you the direct links to their site.
Don't blame me if you can't even understand the climate for children pages.
Are you really calling NASA bullshit?
prove me wrong.. just explain how 400 ppm of C02 can heat up the land, atmosphere and oceans
if you are looking for the douche bags, just look at who has been spreading climate alarmism
oh boy another high school science drop out who is pissed the climate con is falling apart
my god you are stupid
once again if you had any scientific training you would know absorption is a logarithmic function of concentration
it is scientific fundamental
bullshit propaganda
bullshit propaganda by a politicized agency
too bad for you science is not determined by guesses
absorption is a logarithmic function of concentration was determined via experimental work hundreds of years ago
learn some physics long before pretending you can use science to fail trying to control others behaviour
If you mean party as in acting foolish type of party then yes. No one ever took them seriously and Jagshit put his pension ahead of the workers rights and freedoms the NDP once stood for. !5 minutes cities are nothing but concrete jungles. The mass over development of sky high concrete shoe boxes for people to live in gives of plenty of CO2. And they also trap plenty of heat also. The amount of carbon based fuel burned by construction machines and not to mention the amount of waste created.
Last edited:
Hey larue, if this theory of yours that declares the greenhouse effect doesn't exist or that CO2 levels have no effect on the climate please post the actual research and not just copy and pasted 30 year old charts.
Post the researchers who back this theory.
Post the findings of their research.
Post the evidence that backs these claims.
Otherwise you're just pushing 'bullshit propaganda'
You have declared NASA and the greenhouse effect to be 'bullshit propaganda'.
Its amazing how incredibly sure you are of this yet totally unable to back it up.
Ok larue, you've attacked the character of the most respected scientists on the planet.
Lets see how far you are willing to go in slamming the work of other scientists.
Do you think the scientists hired by Exxon and who posted their research almost 50 years ago are also 'bullshit propaganda'?
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformation
This is the point in the debate where you run away and pretend you've had me on ignore.
Every time this comes up you run away and don't post again for a few weeks.
Go ahead, this time tell us why Exxon scientists came up with the same results as NASA and the IPCC.
Don't run away, defend your claim.
Downtown Toronto is a 15 minute city and its great.
Cities take fewer resources than suburban sprawl and rural housing.
So tax the rich and build social housing.
Hey larue, if this theory of yours that declares the greenhouse effect doesn't exist or that CO2 levels have no effect on the climate please post the actual research and not just copy and pasted 30 year old charts.
Post the researchers who back this theory.
Post the findings of their research.
Post the evidence that backs these claims.
Otherwise you're just pushing 'bullshit propaganda'
You have declared NASA and the greenhouse effect to be 'bullshit propaganda'.
Its amazing how incredibly sure you are of this yet totally unable to back it up.
Ok larue, you've attacked the character of the most respected scientists on the planet.
Lets see how far you are willing to go in slamming the work of other scientists.
Do you think the scientists hired by Exxon and who posted their research almost 50 years ago are also 'bullshit propaganda'?
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformationwww.scientificamerican.com
This is the point in the debate where you run away and pretend you've had me on ignore.
Every time this comes up you run away and don't post again for a few weeks.
Go ahead, this time tell us why Exxon scientists came up with the same results as NASA and the IPCC.
Don't run away, defend your claim.
your appeal to authority is meaningless
the Catholic Church says the sun revolves around the earth- 1600
NASA claims man made co2 will char broil the planet - 2000
you mistakenly think a persons or institutions name defines scientific theory
it does not
scientific theory is defined by experimental observation
the commies answer to everything
'steal someone's else's wealth'
you are disgusting
Experimental observation says the planet is warming as fast or faster than the IPCC projected, which is the same projection that Exxon and Shell's own scientists came up with over 40 years ago. There are 20 years of IPCC projections that have been very accurate.
If you are going to argue that NASA, AAAS, Exxon, Shell and the IPCC are all deluded or fraudulent authorities you need to back it with another theory that explains the warming we are seeing, followed by the data they used and the research that shows how they came to that conclusion.
The appeal to authority argument also falls on its face when the 'authority' you claim is in a conspiracy, which is government funded science in over 100 countries backed by right and left wing governments over 40 years is also confirmed by the researchers in the very industry causing the problem. its an idiotic argument. Privately funded research by the people causing climate change came to the same conclusions as the IPCC and NASA.
