Nope.
That could be a clever title for a course about upending things people "know are true" and showing how much more complex the natural world is than we think.
Woman furious at male duck for mating with female
- Thread starter stinkynuts
- Start date
Typos happen.
Of course, we have no evidence she was trying to do that and not just trying to break up the early parts of the assault, since we never see the ducks.
But again, I haven't defended her behaviour.
I've pointed out how weird it is that people seem confused that she viewed a coercive event as coercive.
What do you call it when you omit a punctuation mark? its/it's? Lack of typing or an actual typo, hmm...
Chances are probably good they were mating.
You may not have, but you just needed to chime in, knowing it all, so now you're dealing with it and you learned the difference between its and it's.
She might.
She might know due to knowing about ducks.
She might just be seeing what looks like an attack and interpreting it correctly.
Hell, she might be part of a group that tries to disrupt attacks in disturbed habitats where human interference has resulted in overpopulation of male ducks.
No idea.
I interpreted the net as her trying to break up the ducks swarming, but we don't really get a good look, do we?
She certainly didn't seem to be capturing the ducks or even trying to.
That's interesting.
I've always seen "Karens" primarily associated with the right.
Shows you how they are just an internet meme, really, and people project all kinds of things on them.
Yes, you are projecting political issues onto something as a way of amusing yourself or lashing out or whatever.
It seems a bit silly.
Or they could be mating.
She could be emotionally unhinged (see the part where she gets into the water and asks for a net)
So you're interpreting on something of which you "don't really get a good look"?
Asking for a net and getting it in hand, I don't think her intent was to catch gold fish....?
To me, the OG unhinged Karen.
Silly is fun entertaining, hence THE KAREN, see above video.
And you had to jump in because since you're a "liberal" you didn't like the fact that almost every person called her a crazy leftie and you didn't like that representation of the "lefties".
Did you watch the news last night? Did you see all the men, some with beards, in cheerleader outfits half naked dancing in the streets of Toronto, GROWN MEN! la-la-la-la-la!!
It's a typo.
They're very common.
Not sure why you are trying to read so deeply into it.
The question for her was probably whether or not they were mating coercively or not.Chances are probably good they were mating.
The actual mating is very short, only seconds from what I understand.
The chasing down and the biting and all that would be much longer.
It would be almost impossible for her to interfere with the actual mating, it's so explosive and quick.
You seem weirdly obsessed with typos.You may not have, but you just needed to chime in, knowing it all, so now you're dealing with it and you learned the difference between its and it's.
Are you ok?
That doesn't seem a normal thing to get this worked up over.
Were you there?
I see.
Is this a "everything natural is good" argument you are building here or are you just ignoring the actual science about ducks?
For people who come across as pedantic, why not correct them, help them in their cause. I got your back bro.
I have tons of videos being around ducks, I helped out on a farm, I love animals to death (if that isn't noticeable enough by some of my posts).
If I can figure out a way to take out the audio to protect myself and my friends around me, I will gladly upload and share them.
I will tell you, I've seen ducks do this plenty of times and the females manage to deal with the males an overwhelming majority of the time.
Meet the Quackers (gang), ignore the goat's ass, he was going for some food I had behind me in a bin.
I could correct more, but I won't, your "pride" is crushed as it is.
I repeated it to mess around, you don't have to worry, it's over. lol
Others in the background were there and weren't overly concerned.
I have been around ducks quite a lot and wasn't overly concerned either.
She could!
I think her getting in the water with the net is pretty ridiculous.
I don't think her intention was to catch the ducks in the net, either.
I have no idea.
You might have one, but not much to support it.
You have a very weird definition of a "Karen", then.
Or at least one very different than the one I've seen used.
As I learned it, Karen is very much a "ask to see your manager", "call the police" middle-aged white woman kind of thing.
The classic incident with that woman who called the cops because someone was walking his dog or whatever.
This doesn't really fit at all.
Ok.
No.
I jumped in because everyone was saying she was crazy for thinking ducks could be assaulting another duck, when that's not a crazy thing to think at all.
No.
I went and saw F1 last night.
Good film.
What does the Pride parade have to do with ducks?
Speaking of ignoring about science about ducks, bread is bad for them. It's filler, it has zero nutritional value, it fills them up and then they do not eat what they should be eating to be getting the nutrients, but you knew that of course.
Another reason it's bad on farms is, whatever is thrown if the ducks don't eat it, then mice and rats will come around and that's the last thing my buddy wants on his farm and then going into his animal feed.
Best thing to feed them leafy greens (shredded/torn), green peas are great (protein) and if you really want to have fun with them, get some oats, throw them on the water and watch them go zip around getting the oats, bunch of crazies.
Last edited:
A loon isn't considered part of the duck family.
.Just kidding. Enjoyed your play on words.
Fair enough.
Yes, they do.
The females have strategies as well as the males.
You have a strange view of my "pride".
:-D
You all seem very emotionally invested in this.
I'm really not sure why.
The "science of humans", someone should have jumped in, got a net and stopped her...that would be ironic.
If you can't correlate what I was saying about you jumping into a thread because people were calling her a Karen, alluding to her being batshit crazy and a leftie (which you yourself are, a liberal correct?) You didn't the accusations, the jokes and the optics of a leftie/liberal, so you chimed in with "science bruh". lol
I'll just copy/paste it again, come on, you're all about "the science of ducks", my correlation of lefties/liberals (you) and pride isn't that sciency.
"And you had to jump in because since you're a "liberal" you didn't like the fact that almost every person called her a crazy leftie and you didn't like that representation of the "lefties".
Did you watch the news last night? Did you see all the men, some with beards, in cheerleader outfits half naked dancing in the streets of Toronto, GROWN MEN! la-la-la-la-la!! The lefties.
Cool.
We agree.
When were you last in school?
Is that your whole point? (nature isn't "good or bad", it simply is)
Or is this a build up to a "therefore there is a natural order of things" argument?
Because if it is the first - cool, we agree.
If it is the latter, I'll just nope out of that tiresome conversation right now.
Tons of duck videos, love my animals man, best things on earth.
It's great, I love it. You should see some of the female helpers and Vet techs. lolyou are a lucky man!
I'm envious
It's like they hand out a playbooklosing on facts
accuse them of being too emotional
that's the liberal way
