What if if you are not 100% sure that he's interested in you romantically (he never actually told you, but he sees you a lot). Say, 50% sure? After how many visits per week from him would you start seeing red flags? I changed my opening post to "thinks that he's romantically interested in her"JessiMae said:Get rid of him fast. In the long run it ain't worth the money.
It depends on the SP. I like to think most would break it off with the client. To see what happens when an unscrupulous SP is in this kind of situation, see the following thread: https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=191553hyperdog said:Would an SP continue seeing a client if she thinks that he`s romantically interested in her, but she does not have any feelings for him? Would she block him, or continue seeing him for the money? What do the SPs say here?
If she were indeed professional, she would not drop him right away.KWI said:If she is professional she would drop him as a cleint.
You're kiddin' right??shack said:If she were indeed professional, she would not drop him right away.
She should try and soak the vulnerable sucker for every dime she can first. Then dump him. That's what a true professional would do.
Yeah and I bet your shit doesn't stink either.KWI said:That is what an unprofessional SP would do. Sorry to burst your bubble. This is a business of fantasy and a professional would not take advantage of another's emotional vulnerability like that.
I'll second that and it happens to the Ladies outside of the business/civilian counterparts who try to do the same to the guys considered as "loaded jerks".shack said:If she were indeed professional, she would not drop him right away.
She should try and soak the vulnerable sucker for every dime she can first. Then dump him. That's what a true professional would do.
Seeing as I've been quoted a few times, I'll just say the key to interpreting my post turns on what definition of "professional" one wishes to use.shack said:If she were indeed professional, she would not drop him right away.
She should try and soak the vulnerable sucker for every dime she can first. Then dump him. That's what a true professional would do.
Some SP's (and many civvy women) would definitely qualify as that type of pro.bbking said:I see you are using the definition of "professional" as most people do for Used Car and Insurance Salesman.
bbk
One can only hope! Sure you're not LE??therealpipe said:I think in this businesss it is understood as "no stings attached".
Francesca22 said:I'm sure this has been covered once or many times; But what about dating a client?
Do you think he's just smarter than most, getting it for free...?
Or is it actually possible to meet someone who's genuine.
Just as in anything, it's situational and circumstance plays a role. At the end of the day we are all people.
Intent is key. It goes both ways from a fundamental standpoint.
However, for the original poster- if the money wasn't there and she still is, that should tell you something. I can't say I like every person I meet and I would imagine the same for the flip of that. If a client chooses to see me, the money is a boundary and a creates a professional line. If he makes a choice knowing that, thats his decision, and up to me if I engage.
If someone pours their heart out and I'm upfront (yes I like you/ or NO I don't like you; like that) then he's making a calculated, informative decision with everything on the table if he attempts to book again. That doesn't make me an awful person if he calls to book, or if accept the appointment. The difference is, he KNOWS based on our conversation where he stands. Good or bad, along with limits.
If he's emotionally unstable, I wouldn't see him regardless if he liked me or not...
He's getting what he wants and the reverse is, I am too.
If both parties know where they stand; I don't see an issue.
Just because you are NOT "romantically" interested outside that parameter (client/SP) doesn't mean you can't enjoy each other, or fuck each others brains out.... during your time together and have fun. Money usually sets that boundary.
I will say though, most men wont "express" their feelings in terms of this in fear of the SP cutting them off (rejection) and it goes without being said, which creates unneccessary drama and confusion. If he isn't upfront, the premise of your post is we are suppose to assume they are in love with us or romantically interested without prior indication? I assume most engage with someone like me for the no-strings...
I have clients/ regulars who love their wives. They also love fucking me. Should I assume because they see me regularly that they are interested outside of our "arrangement"???? Or just assume he's there for the same reasons I am.
Don't fix what isn't broken.
Well said! An excellent reply.Francesca22 said:I'm sure this has been covered once or many times; But what about dating a client?
Do you think he's just smarter than most, getting it for free...?
Or is it actually possible to meet someone who's genuine.
Just as in anything, it's situational and circumstance plays a role. At the end of the day we are all people.
Intent is key. It goes both ways from a fundamental standpoint.
However, for the original poster- if the money wasn't there and she still is, that should tell you something. I can't say I like every person I meet and I would imagine the same for the flip of that. If a client chooses to see me, the money is a boundary and a creates a professional line. If he makes a choice knowing that, thats his decision, and up to me if I engage.
If someone pours their heart out and I'm upfront (yes I like you/ or NO I don't like you; like that) then he's making a calculated, informative decision with everything on the table if he attempts to book again. That doesn't make me an awful person if he calls to book, or if accept the appointment. The difference is, he KNOWS based on our conversation where he stands. Good or bad, along with limits.
If he's emotionally unstable, I wouldn't see him regardless if he liked me or not...
He's getting what he wants and the reverse is, I am too.
If both parties know where they stand; I don't see an issue.
Just because you are NOT "romantically" interested outside that parameter (client/SP) doesn't mean you can't enjoy each other, or fuck each others brains out.... during your time together and have fun. Money usually sets that boundary.
I will say though, most men wont "express" their feelings in terms of this in fear of the SP cutting them off (rejection) and it goes without being said, which creates unneccessary drama and confusion. If he isn't upfront, the premise of your post is we are suppose to assume they are in love with us or romantically interested without prior indication? I assume most engage with someone like me for the no-strings...
I have clients/ regulars who love their wives. They also love fucking me. Should I assume because they see me regularly that they are interested outside of our "arrangement"???? Or just assume he's there for the same reasons I am.
Don't fix what isn't broken.