CAW defiant in face of Chrysler's demands

train

New member
Jul 29, 2002
6,991
0
0
Above 7
Sort of shows how pathetic GM management is in agreeing to that softball pitch by the CAW last week.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
Cassini said:
They have private capital behind them, and that private capital is interested in securing a return on investment.
Private capital is more careful because they are spending their own money. Public companies are run by a bunch of managers who don't have any skin in the game and are spending other people's money. Would you pay a CAW worker $75 an hour if it was YOUR MONEY?
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,773
0
0
KBear said:
Although it is our money that will be used for the bailout and to top up the pensions...
I think we have a better use for our money like maybe having a smaller deficit. Nope, no bailout with public money. Let the CAW take care of themselves.
 

wantoplay

Active member
Sep 4, 2004
1,383
0
36
train said:
Sort of shows how pathetic GM management is in agreeing to that softball pitch by the CAW last week.
I agree. WTF were they thinking? If ChryCO gets what they want, then if I were GM, I would go after the same.
 

red

you must be fk'n kid'g me
Nov 13, 2001
17,569
8
38
iamme said:
Updated: Tue Mar. 17 2009 1:31:04 PM
The Canadian Press


TORONTO — Sources familiar with Chrysler's plans say the automaker has already begun work behind the scenes to pull its operations out of Canada if it can't reach an agreement with the Canadian Auto Workers by the end of the month.

Chrysler Canada has said it needs to cut its labour costs by approximately $20 an hour to be competitive with foreign automakers such as Toyota.

Currently, the company estimates its all-in hourly labour costs -- which include wages, benefits and legacy costs such as pensions -- to be approximately $76. To be competitive with Toyota plants operating in Canada, it says it needs to reduce those costs to $57 an hour.........

Complete Article ......
this is a ploy.
 

buckwheat1

New member
Nov 20, 2006
1,064
0
0
Chrysler makes a great looking truck (design) don't know much about the product - looks great and mean!!!
 
thundarr said:
Chrysler hasn't made a decent car since the 50's and even then they were the ugliest things on the road.
Whaddaya mean? I went through the mini-van thing when my kids were little (forgive me...). It was a great little vehicle, notwithstanding it went through oil faster than gas after about 60,000 K. :(

Well, that and the fact that most electrical things stopped working whenever it rained.... including the wipers!

And the rear pop-out windows actually did... and landed on the driveway.

On the upside, I chose a nice rust colour when I bought it, so the rust hardly showed!

But the engine was made by Mitsubishi...
 
Toronto Escorts