Asian Sexy Babe

Jimmy Kimmel Show is back! Sinclair & Nexstar backs down TACO style

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,271
7,771
113
1st amendment only gives citizens protection from the government so they are not imprisoned for free speech.
Trump has every right to voice his opinion of Kimmel and put pressure on him to be cancelled, he just cannot order him to be fired.
Trump has freedom of speech as well, didnt you know??
That is not what you said.
You said Trump can legally put as much pressure as he wants.
No by virtue of his position, he cannot. He IS the government.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
29,394
7,146
113
That is not what you said.
You said Trump can legally put as much pressure as he wants.
No by virtue of his position, he cannot
Of course he can. And he just did.
But the networks make the final decision whether to fire Kimmel or not
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
101,420
28,498
113
Don't mention genocide when referring to Trump since your side didn't go out and vote for Kamala. You had a helping hand in giving BIBI everything he ever wanted.
Its fair to mention the genocide. Harris chose to lose to trump instead of listening to her base and calling for a ceasefire. You can't blame voters, you have to blame the candidate, the party and the lobbyists that made her the choice against trump. Even this week she is being called out during her book tour for this very thing.

Its fair to criticize trump for bailing out Argentina when they did what he is doing to the US, its fair to criticize him for enabling genocide and its fair to criticize Biden/Harris for the same thing. Its all the same systemic crap that is turning the US into a shithole country.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
29,394
7,146
113
Yes, which is why it was a first amendment violation
Wrong. You continously prove that you have no clue what you're talking about.
The FCC sets sets rules for disclosing sponsors, emergency broadcasts, and content regarding obscenity and decency.
It has the power to enforce those rules (which has historically been done through fining networks).


The commission does not directly oversee the national networks – NBC, ABC, CBS and Fox are the biggest - which provide news, sport and other programming to local outlets.
It sets rules for disclosing sponsors, emergency broadcasts, and content regarding obscenity and decency.
Additionally, the FCC handles expanding internet access and reviewing mergers and acquisitions of telecommunications companies.

Daniel Deacon, assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan, says that the FCC can effectively stop corporate mergers by denying the transfer of broadcast licences to the new owners.
"They can effectively kill a deal by telling a broadcasting company that they can't have the licences of the company they're buying," he says.

"Essentially broadcasters do not have the full First Amendment rights that the rest of us have," says Brent Skorup, legal fellow with the libertarian Cato Institute.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,271
7,771
113
Wrong. You continously prove that you have no clue what you're talking about.
The FCC sets sets rules for disclosing sponsors, emergency broadcasts, and content regarding obscenity and decency.
It has the power to enforce those rules (which has historically been done through fining networks).

The following are the simple facts:
- Kimmel made an innocuous joke about Trump.
- Trump was offended and had his henchman Carr, threaten the network.
- Kimmel was subsequently suspended.
Trump misused his position as President and sent his henchman after the network, which led to Kimmel's suspension.
Doesn't matter what the FCC can or cannot do.
Carr threatened to "explore remedies" and if the FCC wished I am sure they can make life very difficult for ABC.
In any case threatening any repercussion, for speech that is not illegal, is an attack on free speech.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
29,394
7,146
113
The following are the simple facts:
- Kimmel made an innocuous joke about Trump.
- Trump was offended and had his henchman Carr, threaten the network.
- Kimmel was subsequently suspended.
Trump misused his position as President and sent his henchman after the network, which led to Kimmel's suspension.
Doesn't matter what the FCC can or cannot do.
Carr threatened to "explore remedies" and if the FCC wished I am sure they can make life very difficult for ABC.
In any case threatening any repercussion, for speech that is not illegal, is an attack on free speech
What part of this BBC article did you not see??


"Essentially broadcasters do not have the full First Amendment rights that the rest of us have," says Brent Skorup, legal fellow with the libertarian Cato Institute.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,271
7,771
113
What part of this BBC article did you not see??


"Essentially broadcasters do not have the full First Amendment rights that the rest of us have," says Brent Skorup, legal fellow with the libertarian Cato Institute.
Jimmy Kimmel does.
And the President cannot use his position to infringe on Kimmel's first amendment rights, which is what he tried to do.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,271
7,771
113
Of course it did.
Tariffs tend to increase prices and therefore expenditures.
Also lower imports.
So GDP artificially looks higher.
GDP was revised higher largely due to new additional data on consumer spending. Personal consumption expenditures rose at an annualized pace of 2.5% in the second quarter, according to the third estimate, up sharply from the second estimate’s 1.6%
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
23,512
18,784
113
Did you read the entire article or just the headline?

Another strong quarter?
The US labor market is slowing and consumer sentiment is declining again but, so far, Americans haven’t cut back on their spending.

That’s key because consumer spending is the lifeblood of the US economy, accounting for about two-thirds of economic output.

Against the odds, retail sales, which comprise a sizable chunk of overall spending, rose 0.6% in August from the prior month, according to Commerce Department data, following July’s 0.6% gain.

The government on Friday releases more comprehensive figures on consumer spending in August, which includes purchases of services, as part of its monthly Personal Consumption Expenditures report.

Still, an increasingly fragile labor market poses a risk to America’s economic engine, especially if layoffs start to climb.

New applications for unemployment benefits remained relatively low last week, the Labor Department said in a separate report released Thursday, but filings by federal workers who’ve been laid off have crept up in recent weeks, and could continue to climb.

In a separate report from the Commerce Department released Thursday, new orders for durable goods rebounded by a strong 2.9% in August, following two consecutive monthly declines, boosted by new orders for aircrafts and parts.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
29,394
7,146
113
Of course it did.
Tariffs tend to increase prices and therefore expenditures.
Also lower imports.
So GDP artificially looks higher.
Did you read the entire article or just the headline?

Another strong quarter?
The US labor market is slowing and consumer sentiment is declining again but, so far, Americans haven’t cut back on their spending.

That’s key because consumer spending is the lifeblood of the US economy, accounting for about two-thirds of economic output.

Against the odds, retail sales, which comprise a sizable chunk of overall spending, rose 0.6% in August from the prior month, according to Commerce Department data, following July’s 0.6% gain.

The government on Friday releases more comprehensive figures on consumer spending in August, which includes purchases of services, as part of its monthly Personal Consumption Expenditures report.

Still, an increasingly fragile labor market poses a risk to America’s economic engine, especially if layoffs start to climb.

New applications for unemployment benefits remained relatively low last week, the Labor Department said in a separate report released Thursday, but filings by federal workers who’ve been laid off have crept up in recent weeks, and could continue to climb.

In a separate report from the Commerce Department released Thursday, new orders for durable goods rebounded by a strong 2.9% in August, following two consecutive monthly declines, boosted by new orders for aircrafts and parts.
But the bottom line is the US (and Canada) are still not even close to being in a recession, like many had predicted. And that is great news!! (y)

 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
23,512
18,784
113
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter
Toronto Escorts