New labour laws - $15/hour min - 3 weeks vacation

TeeJay

Well-known member
Jun 20, 2011
8,042
731
113
west gta
Might not go up at all. They studied this in Seattle and found the workers made about the same amount per week, as they were given fewer hours. So costs to the business could be about the same.

More small businesses will avoid these rules by offering to pay staff cash.
Even if no increased cost the perception of increased cost is an excuse to raise prices
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,870
242
63
So now you are up to three guys who could break into your house,...

And once again,... you haven't answered,...do any of these three guys actually want to have a job at $15/HR,...???
Sure some of them would. Is every person out there employable? No. Does everyone want to work? No. But my point is that SOME people might be less likely to turn to crime if they can make a go of it at the new minimum wage.

Just take a look at the education and reading level of inmates in Canada. Most of them are poorly educated which means their job prospects are slim beyond min wage. Were all of them born stone hard criminals OR were SOME of them just desperate.

It costs over 100K per year to house one inmate. If even a few stay out of prison and work minimum wage jobs it is worth it. That 100K doesn't even include all the other costs that criminal causes society.


Here's a study.....

Heller studied about 1600 Chicago high school students who were enrolled in high violence Chicago schools. During the summer, half were given jobs at minimum wage, along with some counseling.** The other half were unemployed.** For 13 months following the program she tracked the rate at which the participants were arrested for violent crimes.
She found that the teenagers that were employed were 43% less likely to be arrested for a violent crime than the unemployed youths. Heller noted that violent crimes are mostly committed by individuals who have a deficit in “self-control, social information processing and decision-making” which are all skills learned through the workplace experience.

Now I will admit there are people on both sides of the argument.

I'm not sure if the minimum wage increase is a good idea.... all I was stating was my belief that it may have some benefits.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,064
1
0
Sure some of them would. Is every person out there employable? No. Does everyone want to work? No. But my point is that SOME people might be less likely to turn to crime if they can make a go of it at the new minimum wage.

Just take a look at the education and reading level of inmates in Canada. Most of them are poorly educated which means their job prospects are slim beyond min wage. Were all of them born stone hard criminals OR were SOME of them just desperate.

It costs over 100K per year to house one inmate. If even a few stay out of prison and work minimum wage jobs it is worth it. That 100K doesn't even include all the other costs that criminal causes society.


Here's a study.....

Heller studied about 1600 Chicago high school students who were enrolled in high violence Chicago schools. During the summer, half were given jobs at minimum wage, along with some counseling.** The other half were unemployed.** For 13 months following the program she tracked the rate at which the participants were arrested for violent crimes.
She found that the teenagers that were employed were 43% less likely to be arrested for a violent crime than the unemployed youths. Heller noted that violent crimes are mostly committed by individuals who have a deficit in “self-control, social information processing and decision-making” which are all skills learned through the workplace experience.

Now I will admit there are people on both sides of the argument.

I'm not sure if the minimum wage increase is a good idea.... all I was stating was my belief that it may have some benefits.
Dude,...I agree with a lot of your open minded post.

Initially I was just giving you and Granny a hard time,... and it got out of control.
 

EJunkie

Active member
Feb 11, 2011
154
46
28
The aspect of the new legislation which seems most ill conceived to me is pay parity between part time and full time workers. I'm absolutely sure where this is coming from. Unions feel that it is much harder to organize part time workers (given their itinerant nature, and the fact that this group tends to be younger (identifying less with union membership)). Unions are therefore strongly opposed to the ongoing transition to part time employment across the economy.

Further, employers tend to require a higher degree of responsibility from their full time staff, as well as a broader range of capability. Part time workers lack the perspective to see this. They think - if Fred unloads the trucks, and I unload the trucks - not understanding that it's Fred who is also responsible to sign off on the way bills, etc. The interesting thing on this issue is that unions have AGREED with the position of employers on this issue repeatedly! You'd be hard pressed to find collective agreements where FT workers do not receive greater compensation (in wages, or otherwise) compared to part timers.

This aspect is wrong headed conceptually, and is entirely motivated by unions looking to discourage employers from shifting to a part time workforce.
On the other hand GM Canada hired people as supplemental work force employees, they said this category was needed to address short term labour needs. They paid them much less than full time employees. People in this "short term need" category started in the early 2000's.

They did the exact same jobs as full time employees making much more and are still working for GM.
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
17,809
18,405
113
Canada
I'm predicting the Conservatives take the next election and this is water under the bridge. This coming from a Liberal voter, I'm tired of old resting bitch face.
 

Keebler Elf

The Original Elf
Aug 31, 2001
14,737
393
83
The Keebler Factory
All employees especially students need to be better educated on what their employment rights are and how to exercise them.
All of this information is readily available on the interweb (Employment Standards website) and as we all know the kiddies are technologically savvy enough to find and learn on their own.

The fact they can't be bothered is their problem.
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,926
8
38
Few businesses will like this policy, but the big corporations which are the posterchild of low wages (McDonald's and any shopping mall store) are the ones who will worry the least. They can absorb the costs, or simply cut hours or cut staff to balance out the wages being paid out. It's not like the policy has other rules like maintaining existing employee count and hours.

It's the smaller businesses with employees at $10-11 going to $15 that will hurt the most.

Problem is, all the business owners over the years fighting $15/hr wages seem to come from the big boys. Where's all the small businesses fighting policy? I didn't see it.

For people a the bottom fighting for $15/hr, I hope they are going to put in effort to do the best job they can, brush up the resume, and know what they are getting themselves into. It's not like many businesses with lots of employees transitioning to $15/hr will keeps things status quo. There will be shift cuts and people let go. And the best people will be kept.

It's not like money is unlimited.

If it was, heck I want a pay bump too. Instead of that usual 2-3% annual bump, I want a 30% bump like the guys making min wage.
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,926
8
38
Invest in financial education in schools to reduce the number of students spending big money on useless programs and end up stuck with low wage jobs.
So true.

But even if kids are educated how to budget and which career fields pay the best, I still think lots of students won't really care. You can teach a kid the concept of money (income vs expenses), but the second that new iPhone or tablet comes out, there's goes $500.

Many will still do what they feel like, get a shitty job and then expect the government to bail them out.

Also, the jobs that pay best are usually highly technical or require a good head (science, engineering, medical, business, law etc...). Don't get me wrong, that trusted plumber can rake in the cash too, but as a whole field, certain fields pay more than others.

Problem is, some student don't give a shit, aren't smart enough, or prefer more floaty programs like humanities. So even if told where to go for good stable jobs in demand, they'll still be psychology major.

On the plus side, I know many people who floated with low end majors, but got lucky...... the went back to school to get teaching certificate and some landed a nice cozy teaching job. The 10 year club is something like $90k/yr with full benefits.
 

underice

Member
Jan 5, 2007
229
0
16
"Problem is, all the business owners over the years fighting $15/hr wages seem to come from the big boys. Where's all the small businesses fighting policy? I didn't see it."


Its hard as a small business owner to individually have a voice.That is why many smart small business owners join trade groups like the CFIB or restaurant associations to voice their concerns for them.This is also going to drive the underground economy.
 

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,725
1,428
113
I'm predicting the Conservatives take the next election and this is water under the bridge. This coming from a Liberal voter, I'm tired of old resting bitch face.
How does that work? Even if they win the next election, all the labour law adjustments and the $14/hour min come into effect on January 1st, 2018...before the election. The only thing they can avoid is the bump from $14 to $15 in 2019. Everything else will be in effect, and I can't see them having the political will to reverse any of it, but especially the minimum wage.
 

LeeHelm

New member
Apr 14, 2002
778
1
0
In today's era it doesn't matter how many vacation days people get. Half won't take them for fear of getting canned/replaced, getting backlogged on work, etc. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/55-of-american-workers-dont-take-all-their-paid-vacation-2016-06-15
B freaking S. People who have a strong work ethic don't take all of their vacation. The people that are at minimum at wage all of their life have no work ethic it is the reason they are at minimum wage their whole lives (of course there are exceptions), People that lack work ethic at going to take every last minute of their vacation and sick time. They don't give a rat's ass about being canned.
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,926
8
38
B freaking S. People who have a strong work ethic don't take all of their vacation. The people that are at minimum at wage all of their life have no work ethic it is the reason they are at minimum wage their whole lives (of course there are exceptions), People that lack work ethic at going to take every last minute of their vacation and sick time. They don't give a rat's ass about being canned.
True.

We get 5 sick days a year in the office, and 2-3 "personal days". You always know which people will suddenly get sick near a long weekend, and somehow crisis personal days happen around Christmas break time.

These days are suppose to be if you are legitimately sick, or need time off for something important like moving, a wedding you attending etc... Not to be added on as 8 extra days of vacation.

One time, I took a Friday off and decided to go to the mall. A coworker said he was going to take a personal day the same day for an important family event.

I bumped into him at the fucking mall. He was there shopping... bags in hand... with his girlfriend.
 

LeeHelm

New member
Apr 14, 2002
778
1
0
Sure some of them would. Is every person out there employable? No. Does everyone want to work? No. But my point is that SOME people might be less likely to turn to crime if they can make a go of it at the new minimum wage.

Just take a look at the education and reading level of inmates in Canada. Most of them are poorly educated which means their job prospects are slim beyond min wage. Were all of them born stone hard criminals OR were SOME of them just desperate.

It costs over 100K per year to house one inmate. If even a few stay out of prison and work minimum wage jobs it is worth it. That 100K doesn't even include all the other costs that criminal causes society.


Here's a study.....

Heller studied about 1600 Chicago high school students who were enrolled in high violence Chicago schools. During the summer, half were given jobs at minimum wage, along with some counseling.** The other half were unemployed.** For 13 months following the program she tracked the rate at which the participants were arrested for violent crimes.
She found that the teenagers that were employed were 43% less likely to be arrested for a violent crime than the unemployed youths. Heller noted that violent crimes are mostly committed by individuals who have a deficit in “self-control, social information processing and decision-making” which are all skills learned through the workplace experience.

Now I will admit there are people on both sides of the argument.

I'm not sure if the minimum wage increase is a good idea.... all I was stating was my belief that it may have some benefits.

And I would bet that the kids that were employed and avoided violence would have avoided violence if they were employed or not.

The type of kid that gets involved in crime almost always has no foundation in his life. No one to guide him from day one. Why in the hell would this type of person chose to work in a minimum wage job when he can sell drugs and make 100x what he makes at McDonald's? You could lay a job with excellent opportunity (and McDonald's is an excellent opportunity) right at one of these kids' feet and they are going to tun it down.

Pin head college professors have no idea how the real world works. Lets see a study on a program and reaches out to kids with a criminal background and see how long they stick with the job.
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
17,809
18,405
113
Canada
How does that work? Even if they win the next election, all the labour law adjustments and the $14/hour min come into effect on January 1st, 2018...before the election. The only thing they can avoid is the bump from $14 to $15 in 2019. Everything else will be in effect, and I can't see them having the political will to reverse any of it, but especially the minimum wage.
Is it even law yet? Has a bill been passed?
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,870
242
63
Dude,...I agree with a lot of your open minded post.

Initially I was just giving you and Granny a hard time,... and it got out of control.
LEave me out of comments re: Wynne.... I have zero love for her.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,870
242
63
So true.

But even if kids are educated how to budget and which career fields pay the best, I still think lots of students won't really care. You can teach a kid the concept of money (income vs expenses), but the second that new iPhone or tablet comes out, there's goes $500.

Many will still do what they feel like, get a shitty job and then expect the government to bail them out.

Also, the jobs that pay best are usually highly technical or require a good head (science, engineering, medical, business, law etc...). Don't get me wrong, that trusted plumber can rake in the cash too, but as a whole field, certain fields pay more than others.

Problem is, some student don't give a shit, aren't smart enough, or prefer more floaty programs like humanities. So even if told where to go for good stable jobs in demand, they'll still be psychology major.

On the plus side, I know many people who floated with low end majors, but got lucky...... the went back to school to get teaching certificate and some landed a nice cozy teaching job. The 10 year club is something like $90k/yr with full benefits.
Take a look at top 10% wage earners..... people over 80K.... you'll find people in business, medicine AND construction
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,870
242
63
And I would bet that the kids that were employed and avoided violence would have avoided violence if they were employed or not.

The type of kid that gets involved in crime almost always has no foundation in his life. No one to guide him from day one. Why in the hell would this type of person chose to work in a minimum wage job when he can sell drugs and make 100x what he makes at McDonald's? You could lay a job with excellent opportunity (and McDonald's is an excellent opportunity) right at one of these kids' feet and they are going to tun it down.

Pin head college professors have no idea how the real world works. Lets see a study on a program and reaches out to kids with a criminal background and see how long they stick with the job.
Read again.... they took 1600 kids and split them in half.... presumable it was random..... so to have a difference of 43% less likely is pretty remarkable.
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,926
8
38
Take a look at top 10% wage earners..... people over 80K.... you'll find people in business, medicine AND construction
Construction? Hard to believe, but I don't think that really makes a difference for kids nowadays. With so many accustomed to the net and not really doing anything active anymore (what ever happened to bike riding, playing in the park, street hockey etc....?), I don't think many would go into construction.

Most would rather stare at a tablet at the dinner table.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,064
1
0
LEave me out of comments re: Wynne.... I have zero love for her.
No problem,...I'll just continue to give you a hard time,...:)

At least we agree on something,...
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts