So, the more diverse the population the higher the number?danmand said:same one that says western and central europe 1.5
OTB
So, the more diverse the population the higher the number?danmand said:same one that says western and central europe 1.5
you think you are very clever today?onthebottom said:So, the more diverse the population the higher the number?
LOL!danmand said:you think you are very clever today?
Why is the murder rate in the US so much higher than the murder rate in Toronto? It's 1.8 to 2.0 in Toronto. The US murder rate is two and a half times higher; even the murder rate you quoted for whites only in the US is 150% higher.onthebottom said:Canada isn't Toronto
The number goes up because you are including a bunch of developing nations. Yes, US crime is similar to that in many developing nations if that is what you are trying to say. Why?onthebottom said:So, the more diverse the population the higher the number?
OTB
Fewer murderers???????????fuji said:Why is the murder rate in the US so much higher than the murder rate in Toronto?
You're only slightly wrong....the primary CAUSE (IMHO) of the violence is socio-economic, the poor gun control only further enables and escalates the violence. With tighter gun control, some of the crimes would indeed never occur as the gun is a coward's weapon. A good portion of the crime would still exist but be commited with other weapons.fuji said:My own personal theory is, of course, that it has to do in large part with gun control, maginified by the lack of a decent social welfare system.
..........
That's my view--however, if I'm wrong, if it's not gun control, if it's not lack of a decent social welfare system, then what is it?
You don't have a massive black or hispanic population in Toronto.fuji said:Why is the murder rate in the US so much higher than the murder rate in Toronto? It's 1.8 to 2.0 in Toronto. The US murder rate is two and a half times higher; even the murder rate you quoted for whites only in the US is 150% higher.
Don't tell me that Toronto is less diverse than the US.
onthebottom said:You don't have a massive black or hispanic population in Toronto.
OTB
Handguns have been banned in Washington DC for years (although that was just overturned) yet the murder rate was sky high? Why?fuji said:I asked the question because every time I tried to link gun control to violence in the US I was told by some gun nut that the statistics didn't prove that--that something else causes all the violence. So what is it?
My own personal theory is, of course, that it has to do in large part with gun control, maginified by the lack of a decent social welfare system.
One of the prime arguments put forwrad by gun nuts is that the population needs guns in order to limit the power of government. Ed lepps likes to talk about how you need guns to defend against a tyrannical government.
Well it works! Enough people in the US have guns that they are able to undermine the rule of law.
One man's militia is another man's gang. One man's tea (as in tea party) is another man's crack cocaine. One many's tyranny is another man's war on drugs. Mix in a bunch of people who have been screwed over by a racist system and denied access to any decent form of social welfare, leaving them desperate.
Put it all together and you have some disenfranchised people who want to sell crack cocaine, perceive that the tyrannical government is trying to stop them, so they form a militia (oops, gang) to kill anyone--including any police--who stand in their way.
While the warlords in the US have not (yet) taken power away from the democratically elected government overall they sure have put a dent in it, and it shows up in violent crime stats.
Of course gun nuts will disagree and somehow say that guns are something that are only used against the government by good upstanding people who love democracy, and never by drug kingpins and warlords who hate it.
That's my view--however, if I'm wrong, if it's not gun control, if it's not lack of a decent social welfare system, then what is it?
And you can trace all of it to the absence of a reasonable welfare system.papasmerf said:I don't see race as the key factor. I do see ignorance as being it. You can trace that to the parents and school systems.
I think you're on the verge of a very profitable career as a defense lawyer defending drug thugs.fuji said:I asked the question because every time I tried to link gun control to violence in the US I was told by some gun nut that the statistics didn't prove that--that something else causes all the violence. So what is it?
My own personal theory is, of course, that it has to do in large part with gun control, maginified by the lack of a decent social welfare system.
One of the prime arguments put forwrad by gun nuts is that the population needs guns in order to limit the power of government. Ed lepps likes to talk about how you need guns to defend against a tyrannical government.
Well it works! Enough people in the US have guns that they are able to undermine the rule of law.
One man's militia is another man's gang. One man's tea (as in tea party) is another man's crack cocaine. One many's tyranny is another man's war on drugs. Mix in a bunch of people who have been screwed over by a racist system and denied access to any decent form of social welfare, leaving them desperate.
Put it all together and you have some disenfranchised people who want to sell crack cocaine, perceive that the tyrannical government is trying to stop them, so they form a militia (oops, gang) to kill anyone--including any police--who stand in their way.
While the warlords in the US have not (yet) taken power away from the democratically elected government overall they sure have put a dent in it, and it shows up in violent crime stats.
Of course gun nuts will disagree and somehow say that guns are something that are only used against the government by good upstanding people who love democracy, and never by drug kingpins and warlords who hate it.
That's my view--however, if I'm wrong, if it's not gun control, if it's not lack of a decent social welfare system, then what is it?
ROFLMMFAOPMPpapasmerf said:Drugs and reporting of crimes
What's a resonable welfare system?danmand said:And you can trace all of it to the absence of a reasonable welfare system.
Hey what do you want for 4am...........He was lucky I did not shoot himanomandar said:ROFLMMFAOPMP
U never cease to amaze me....
What happened in SF? It used to lead the pack.onthebottom said:Top 10 murder cities in the US (2003) av/100k population:
1 New Orleans 52.3
2 Washington, D.C. 43.9
3 Detroit 41.8
4 Baltimore 38.7
5 Atlanta 34.0
6 St. Louis 32.5
7 Birmingham 30.3
8 Newark, NJ 28.2
9 Oakland, CA 24.6
10 Memphis 22.4
OTB