If you're still that scared, then stay home and avoid the spas altogether. Don't ruin things for the rest of us, please.
Will spas enforce the vaccine passport?
- Thread starter hedo rick
- Start date
True, assuming the government makes correct decisions. And this is a very big assumption.
As I’ve already stated repeatedly, I have stayed home, and I’ll continue to stay home unless and until the conditions improve to the point where I believe it’s safe to partake.
I can hold out as long as necessary. The break has been very good for my wallet.
Not a government run site and users uploaded their own information to the site.
Their own fault for putting their info on a public site.
Anyone surprised ? This is just the start . My prediction is that unvaxcinated will also need to show ID. Under the guise of " contact tracing " . If you are not seeing these passports as a problem in a free society . You have not been paying attention .
Many do get the picture . But the majority are letting the TV think for them . You have just scratched the surface of what makes no sence .You're going by what the government is telling you and I'm pointing out that they are making incorrect assumptions.
Do you also realize that the government considers the following groups of people as unvaccinated, when it counts covid cases:
- those who got 1 shot
- those who got 2 shots, but got covid within 14 days of their second shot (similarly if someone dies within 14 days of taking their second shot, their death would count as an unvaccinated person)
- those who got 2 shots, but got covid 120 days after their second shot
The government has made certain decisions during this pandemic that someone knowledgeable enough would question including:
- pushing ahead with AZ vaccinations while many countries put on the breaks, because of the early safety concerns around blood clots that were appearing
- saying it's no problem to delay taking the second shot, because of shipment delays, meanwhile the vaccines were studied for a specific number of weeks apart and none of the pharmaceuticals backed that notion
- encouraging mixing vaccines, again because of shipment delays, which once again none of the pharmaceuticals backed and if you read the product monograph for the now approved Pfizer covid vaccine it says:
"There are no data available on the interchangeability of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine with other COVID-19 vaccines to complete the vaccination series. Individuals who have received one dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine should receive a second dose of
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to complete the vaccination series."
Because of their gaffe the government had to ask other countries to let Canadian visitors enter, because many countries don't consider someone fully vaccinated by mixing vaccines, as such vaccines were not conceived to be used such a wat. And, the government had no choice but to start its own trial to try and support this experimental idea. You can read more about the MOSAIC trial here:
- one of the worse things the government did was extending the expiry of a batch of an AZ vaccine. That's a huge no no. Pharma companies deal with huge losses every year from scrapping expired drug. Yet instead of donating the vaccines that were to expire, in order not to lose the drugs, the government decided it would simply extend their expiry by 1 month. If pharma companies could do that as they please, they would save lots of money! There is a reason the expiry is a certain date and that's from the data the pharma company has come up with. If they could extend the expiry date, you could be sure they would and sometimes they do after producing the data to support this.About Research Studies - CIRN
CIRN conducts a variety of research studies throughout the year, and many of these studies are multi-year projects. Often there are opportunities for members of the public to participate in studies in their local area; the Research Studies descriptions provide an overview of the study and...cirnetwork.ca
Anyway I could keep going, but I think you get the picture.
Went to a MP where they had a small envelope that you slid your health card into that had a hole cut in the spot where your picture and last 4 digits of your OHIP card were.
They also had a manilla envelope that you slid your proof of vaccination receipt with holes cut to view the dose number, date and last 4 digits of your OHIP card so they could match it.
Name, D.O.B. and complete OHIP number not visible.
I thought that was a great idea for privacy.
Obviously not a third party app from a company with no encryption for the main platform or any data storage security systems.
You don't get the picture! 80% plus of adults have had their double dose and are fed up with folks who have not! You lost! Deal with it or stay home and enjoy home-cooked meals.
Could you, please, support the "and" in your claim with the data. I am among the 80% of fully-vaccinated but I support people's right to refuse vaccine and I am against vaccine passports. You have a tendency to think and speak for other people based on your own beliefs.
https://nationalpost.com/news/tensi...work_boosting&utm_content=trending_broadsheet
77% of vaccinated polled have negative views of the unvaccinated.
What is interesting is that even 25% of the unvaccinated that were polled have negative views of other people who are unvaccinated.
Wow, something should be done about it. The hatred toward a specific group of people is not OK. The government should definitely do something about it. Maybe run a positive add complain saying that hate is "unCanadia", that all people have rights to refuse the vaccine and they should not be treated badly because of their choice.
I don't see an apology coming from you Fall. Come on, be a man and admit you were wrong.
You mean apologising for asking for a proof? Nothing wrong about asking, and I got the link that show that 77% of vaccinated have negative view of vaccinated which can be views as a weak support for your claim. But you are twisting the notion of "negative view". It does not show the exact question in the survey: if "negative" means that they are idiots and should get vaccinated (I would be the first to agree with such statement) or that they prolong pandemic and increase risk fro everyone by refusing to get vaccinated (I also agree with this statement) or that their right to do what vaccinated people can do should be reduced (I am strongly against this). So, "got fed up with" and "have negative view of" are very different things. I am not sure you understand it as for you the result justifies the methods, but for me these two feelings are not the same.
You accused me of having a tendancy to speak for other people based on my beliefs. You are WRONG and yet you once again spin and twist but in the end, you just can't man up and accept you were wrong!
yes, you have such tendency and you did it again saying that 80% of vaccinated are fed up with vaccinated instead of saying they have "negative view" of them. You always twist the data in your favour and change the wording to make it more consistent with your point of view. Not only you are speaking for other people, but you also change the other people words and claim that that they say something different than what they actually said.
