We don't know yet if Harper did anything illegal.red said:well at least that is legal.
Put your pitchfork and torch away for now.
We don't know yet if Harper did anything illegal.red said:well at least that is legal.
I agree. If he stuck to his guns he wins no matter what the opposition does.LancsLad said:Stephen missed his chance to nail those bastards a good one.
It was wrong. A canadian gov't spying and recording opposition political parties. its shameful.lookingforitallthetime said:We don't know yet if Harper did anything illegal.
Put your pitchfork and torch away for now.
Well, if they defeat the government with a non confidence vote there are three possibilities:fuji said:Although Flaherty and Harper have backed down from some of the more controversial measures in the "economic update" and are beginning to relent on the issue of providing a stimulus the Opposition still seems to be talking about defeating the government and forming a coalition.
Will they?
red, we don't know the whole story yet.red said:It was wrong. A canadian gov't spying and recording opposition political parties. its shameful.
LancsLad said:this morning on the news they were talking about the infighting all weekend in the libweenie ranks as to who would lead the coalition of the damned.
Plus there is some butthole twitching being displayed by some libs as they have now started to think that what the hell would happen if the GG said no to the coalition and sends us to the polls again. Some libs are clever enough to realize that the optics of such a putdown would not be a positive for them in the campaign.
i think that Harper should have stood his ground with the opposition. He had them in the perfect box and let them ooze out. that was a tactical error on his part. The opposition would have backed down eventually. They are mainly spineless libs and blockheads. The blockheads being from kwebek are all bark no bite. froggy always runs when the going gets tough and the dippers don't have a clue what to think.
Stephen missed his chance to nail those bastards a good one.
Se Canadian stuff can be just as rivetiing as your American pols.
danmand said:Sjeeezzzz, Lancslad, you are not going to spin this into a victory
for the conservatives.
As a backroom operator for the conservatives, how did you get your
PM into such a quagmire?
The rats are jumping ship already, i see.LancsLad said:I am not a "backroom operator".. If by chance I was to hold any real power, things would be noticably different in this country. Thats not the case yet but perhaps in due time we will be fortunate enough to have my level headed, sensitive and caring style of rule in place.
Steve dug this hole ALL by himself.
Why in the world did you not get a legal opinion before you put itLancsLad said:before.This has been discussed
I believe that the law in Canada is such that a telephone conversation may be taped, without disclosing that it is being taped, so long as one of the parties to the conversation gives their consent.
Let's ask the Boards legal eagles to comment rather that engage in speculation.
Let me get this straight ...... you want these board members to not engage in speculation? It is the christmas season but i think that wish is just a little bit to much even for Santa ClausLancsLad said:This has been discussed before.
I believe that the law in Canada is such that a telephone conversation may be taped, without disclosing that it is being taped, so long as one of the parties to the conversation gives their consent.
Let's ask the Boards legal eagles to comment rather that engage in speculation.
.
danmand said:Why in the world did you not get a legal opinion before you put it
on the conservatives' website?
I don't think the conservative party of canada was a party to the internal conference call of the ndp. thats a bit of a stretch wouldn't you think?LancsLad said:This has been discussed before.
I believe that the law in Canada is such that a telephone conversation may be taped, without disclosing that it is being taped, so long as one of the parties to the conversation gives their consent.
Let's ask the Boards legal eagles to comment rather that engage in speculation.
.
Yes I personally would think it is a stretch but that is apparantly what happened, a conservative staffer was on the distribution list for the information. They tuned in and voila shit flies.red said:I don't think the conservative party of canada was a party to the internal conference call of the ndp. thats a bit of a stretch wouldn't you think?
I'm still not sure where the "shit" is supposed to be. Layton has been saying for ages that he opposes what the government is doing. that he's out there planning to do what he said he would do is hardly a criticism of him.landscaper said:Yes I personally would think it is a stretch but that is apparantly what happened, a conservative staffer was on the distribution list for the information. They tuned in and voila shit flies.
Maybe this is not too different than the way Stephan Harper said in 2004 that he had for a long time been in close consultation with the NDP and the Bloc? He put that in a letter he signed and delivered to the Governor General--or do you think he was lying?landscaper said:The shit in this case is Layton and company accusing the Tories of illegal activities. If indeed the story turns out that the liberals and the Ndp have been in discussion with the Bloc for a long period of time it puts paid to the outrage at the economic statement.
red said:I don't think the conservative party of canada was a party to the internal conference call of the ndp. thats a bit of a stretch wouldn't you think?
DonQuixote said:With all due respect, why are you compelled to pledge your
loyalty to any specific political party? A pox on all their houses.
The fastest growing political group in the US are independents.
You should try to join that party.