Confessions of A Transplantologist in Ukraine
BLACK MARKET SOLD AFU FIGHTERS FOR ORGANS
www.bitchute.com
Ukraine updates
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
- Status
www.bitchute.com
All politicians lie! And all Politicians lined their pockets with dirty money or they steal money or get money from bribes or somehow get money funded to them illegally by third party,. Probably also …I don’t keep track. Because I am born and live in Canada. It is easier to remember the foolishness of endless American wars . I rank a used car salesman trust worthness slightly higher then a politician or a comedian!
Last edited:
But you posted it because it supports your narrative. And then you defended it when I called you out on the absurdity of the numbers.
I would say you lack critical thinking skills, but you are clearly just posting spam nonsense.
You must have eaten so much crow by now that it’s giving you indigestion.
Last edited:
Top US General: Ukraine Should Not Use US Equipment to Attack Russia - News From Antiwar.com
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley insists that "this is a Ukrainian war. It is not a war between the United States and Russia. It's not a war between NATO and Russia."The top US general reaffirmed that Kiev has long been asked not to use military…
SATURDAY, MAY 27, 2023 - 08:30 PM
Authored by Connor Freeman via AntiWar.com,
The top US general reaffirmed that Kiev has long been asked not to use military equipment provided by Washington to conduct attacks against Russian territory, according to Reuters. This policy is necessary because such attacks could provoke a direct clash between NATO and Russia, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley emphasized while speaking with reporters at the Pentagon on Thursday.
Milley’s comments came after a neo-Nazi group, which operates as part of Kiev’s armed forces and cooperates with Ukrainian military intelligence, carried out a cross-border raid in Russia. Denis Nikitin is the leader of the Russian Volunteer Corps, which is said to be made up of Russian citizens including some members of the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion who fought, since 2014, for Kiev during the Donbas war. Nikitin said his men were using US equipment, such as two M1224 MaxxPro armored vehicles, also known as MRAPs, during the raid. Members of another militia, the Freedom of Russia Legion, also participated in the assault.
Getty images
According to Russian officials, the terrorists launched mortar and artillery attacks against civilian infrastructure and residential areas in the Belgorod region on Monday. Ukraine’s military intelligence hints that they were behind the attack, while stopping short of officially taking credit. Though, some documents included in the Discord Leaks suggest that Ukrainian President Zelensky’s regime was planning similar operations, specifically using these Russian volunteers equipped with "various qualitative types of NATO weapons."
According to the New York Times, US officials believe Kiev was behind Monday’s raid and the recent attempted drone strike on the Kremlin, which Moscow believes was an attempt to kill Russian President Vladimir Putin. The officials also believe Kiev is responsible for a series of assassinations and other covert attacks within Russia. Moreover, the deputy head of Ukraine’s main intelligence directorate admitted this week that they are actively attempting to assassinate Putin and other Russian officials.
Kiev’s position is that the Belgorod raid was carried out independently from Zelensky’s intelligence and military services. But the Freedom of Russia Legion’s special representative, Ilya Ponomarev, said the group received Kiev’s "green light" regarding the attack. Pictures and videos posted by the Russian military have confirmed Nikitin’s claims.
“It is no secret for us that more and more equipment is being delivered to Ukraine’s armed forces,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday when asked by reporters about the militias’ U.S.-made hardware.
Contrarily, Milley refused to say Washington has drawn any firm conclusions yet. “I can’t say with definitive accuracy right this minute to you whether that – and I saw the same video – whether that’s U.S. supplied equipment or not, what was the nature of the attack, who did what to whom,” Milley insisted.
He continued, "…but I can say that we have asked the Ukrainians not to use U.S.-supplied equipment for direct attacks into Russia." For its part, Reuters stated they were "able to confirm the location of damaged [U.S.-made military hardware such as Humvee military trucks] and surrounding details shown in the video, though could not verify the date it was filmed."
Kiev has ostensibly pledged not to use long-range weapons provided by Washington to attack Russia, but leaked documents also show that Zelensky does not intend to keep his word. Earlier this month, the Washington Post reported that "behind closed doors, Ukraine’s leader has proposed going in a more audacious direction – occupying Russian villages to gain leverage over Moscow, bombing a pipeline that transfers Russian oil to Hungary, a NATO member, and privately pining for long-range missiles to hit targets inside Russia’s borders, according to classified US intelligence documents detailing his internal communications with top aides and military leaders."
However, the Joe Biden administration has now greenlit their European allies’ plans to transfer F-16s to Ukraine. Biden proclaims that he has received Zelensky’s "flat assurance" that the fighter jets will not be used to attack Russia.
Though, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) told a reporter on Wednesday that he "wouldn’t care if they did," reflecting the uber hawkishness that has become acceptable within the US Congress. Furnishing Zelensky’s regime with warplanes was long ruled out over fears that it would be perceived by Moscow as the alliance directly entering the war.
"We see that Western countries are still adhering to the escalation scenario. It involves colossal risks for themselves," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko admonished the alliance after the Western plans to send F-16s to Ukraine became public. When asked about the Russian official’s warning, Biden threatened "it is for them."
Milley explained these restrictions are ostensibly implemented in hopes of avoiding a direct war with Russia. “Why is that? Because we don’t want – this is a Ukrainian war. It is not a war between the United States and Russia. It’s not a war between NATO and Russia,” Milley said.
The general’s claims fall flat given the fact that, so far, the US has pledged $113 billion backing Kiev in this proxy war. Washington’s Ukraine policy is explicitly designed to "weaken" Russia as Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin made clear last year.
The White House is shipping Bradley armored fighting vehicles, longer range rockets, Patriot missile systems, and M1 Abrams tanks to the battlefield. Concurrently, the CIA is reportedly conducting sabotage attacks on Russian infrastructure and the Pentagon has tacitly endorsed Kiev’s drone strikes hundreds of miles deep inside the Russian mainland. The UK has armed Zelensky’s regime with depleted uranium munitions, linked to cancer and birth defects, which are being fired at Russian troops by British tanks. Far exceeding the reach of any weapons system the US has pledged, London has equipped Kiev with Storm Shadow missiles with a range of more than 155 miles. The missiles can be fired by the MIG-29 warplanes NATO members Slovenia and Poland sent to Ukraine earlier this year.
Beyond the Washington-led bloc’s massive military aid, an assortment of NATO commandos, US troops, CIA, and Special Operations forces are on the ground in Ukraine as well.
You used Business Insider to make a point and now that it is proven wrong you accuse it of being liberal? You did not know that when you posted it or did you do that because it was favourable to you?
I still firmly believe in the number that Ukrainian dead and wounded it in the 300, 000: range killed and probably wounded in that range too maybe wound and killed somewhere around 500,000 . Don’t remember the number. Saw a video where someone an war analyst speculated that number can’t remember where that video I saw in you tube. Russian range killed probably 20,000 and wounded another 30,000 . When the ar is over and years from now the true number will eventually come out.
You seem to think Poutine is willing to gamble his life away. You just don't get it do you. I can't really explain it more simply.
Also
"
"We have a military doctrine - everything is written there," Alexander Grushko was quoted by state news agency RIA as saying.
Russia's official military deployment principles allow for the use of nuclear weapons if they - or other types of weapons of mass destruction - are used against it, or if the Russian state faces an existential threat from conventional weapons."
Ukraine taking back it's clay is not an existential risk to Russia. SO you have established either
1: By Russian doctrine they will not use nukes vs Ukraine or
2: You don't understand the words existential threat.
For that matter, losing the black sea fleet also isn't an existential threat either. It would suck, but Mother Russia is not under any threat, definitely not it's existence.
To quote Laurence Fishbourne from Pulp Fiction. English, do you speak it mother fucker.
"The decision to use Russia's vast nuclear arsenal, the biggest in the world, rests with the Russian president, currently Vladimir Putin."
Actually I've heard to the contrary.
The President of Russia (the Supreme Commander-in-Chief) has a cheget on hand at all times. It is one of three, with the other two held by the Minister of Defence and the Chief of the General Staff. It may be that affirmations from two of the three are needed to trigger an actual launch
But who cares what the Economist, the Moscow Times and Strategic Insights say on the topic.
It repeats the phraseology of the military doctrine but adds details about four circumstances under which a nuclear strike would be ordered. These include reliable information of a ballistic missile attack on Russia and an enemy's attack "on critical state or military installations of the Russian Federation, the incapacitation of which would lead to the disruption of a response by nuclear forces."
Neither of which covers losing Ukraine clay or taking out naval assets at least at sea.
Also even if they could, doesn't mean they would. If you have a policy to punch anyone in the face who calls you a fag and Classic Era Mike Tyson calls you a fag... you probably will offer to suck his dick if you had any brains.
The other side Putin if he feel he country is under essential threat or other Russia war hawk able to convince Russia to strike first since they have the advantage! ( Hypersonic nuclear missile) why won’t be justifying using it first to defend mother Russia!
You know that all ICBMs would easily count as hypersonic right? How to let people know you are using buzz words without understanding them without actually telling them.
"All of the intercontinental ballistic missiles in the world's nuclear arsenals are hypersonic, reaching about 15,000 mph (24,140 kph), or about 4 miles (6.4 km) per second at their maximum velocity."
Also using nukes first doesn't defend mother Russia, it means at the lease they get fucked and at the worse they get turned to glass. Why can't you get that through your thick skull.
"1) One hypersonic nuclear explosion over middle North America continent atmosphere will created a EMP pulse destroying most of North America infrastructure electrical grid that will destroy every electronic chip and electrical system in North America."
It would take more than one for serious coverage... also erm Europe? Also it would do nothing to the US military who are hardened vs this sort of stuff nor would it do shit to their nuclear assets... guess what happens in response
2) One hypersonic nuclear missile on Washington DC. to end all form of government ( White House, Congress, , All 3 letter mostly spy agencies in Washington DC.
Well good thing Russia doesn't have a capital city right...
Also and if they are not all there...
United States presidential line of succession - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
3) One hypersonic nuclear in YellowStone National park to trigger a super volcano that will destroy most of USA."
Oh well is some rando on youtube says this is a thing, it has to be a thing. I am not a geologist nor have I ever stayed at a best western express, but from what little I've read about yellowstone, I kinda doubt it. Put that video in the bucket with the tons of other youtube garbage that floats out there. Oh wait, it supports your thesis so it must be right...
Oh fuck, the inforgraphics show, everything I've seen from them that intersects with my knowledge base is pure hot garbage, and I am not the only person to make that observation.
Also The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) also states that it is very unlikely that a nuclear blast could trigger an eruption of Yellowstone. The now-dormant volcano has been undisturbed by much greater releases of energy in the form of earthquakes
Can a nuclear blast trigger a Yellowstone eruption? No. But how about an earthquake? Also no. | U.S. Geological Survey
YVO has noted, with some amusement, tabloid headlines about various diabolical schemes to trigger an eruption of Yellowstone by nuking the caldera. If you find these crazy schemes somewhat unnerving, please don't be concerned—such a plan has zero chance of working!
4) One hypersonic nuclear on California to trigger San Andrea Fault Super or Mega Earthquake.
Wasn't that the plot to a Superman movie, or a James Bond movie, or Austin Powers. Riiiiight
Also no
Can a nuclear blast trigger a Yellowstone eruption? No. But how about an earthquake? Also no. | U.S. Geological Survey
YVO has noted, with some amusement, tabloid headlines about various diabolical schemes to trigger an eruption of Yellowstone by nuking the caldera. If you find these crazy schemes somewhat unnerving, please don't be concerned—such a plan has zero chance of working!
I know some Russian strategist is saying this would be a good idea and of course ye of limited critial thinking skills bought it hook line and sinker... the same people who said that a few nukes could literally remove England off the map and leave nothing but water behind... a claim believed by Jordan Peterson but not anybody who has the slightest clue about nuclear weapons such as one whom your present interlocutor is in the habit of defining by means of the perpendicular pronoun.
I won’t be surprised if other Russian war hawk generals might tempt convince Putin to used EMP nuclear device on Ukraine to end the war quickly. Used a EMP attack destroyed all Ukrainian defence and then moved quickly to Kiev to end this war quickly!
Which is why the US must not only be seen to be willing to do what it takes to make this the wrong decision but actually follow through.
Please... just stop. What you've just said... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point, in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
Last edited:
You are so full of shit. And crow.
I am not going to go back to track it down but you were not born in Canada and english is not your first, second or third language either. And you are not a P. Eng and PEO member. You are a "engineering designer" whatever that is.
Obviously I posted because it was liberal media therefore I wanted to used it to make a point . That not all information are from Russia ..I thought is was true and it was favourable And believeable . In war it easy to make 10,000 drone a days it just model airplane anybody can go on youtube and make your own airplane drone from a hardware store. Off shelves commercial purchase model airplane/ drones. And you have Amazon and China that can ramp up factory drone production easily if you have money.
Last edited:
So you think that the (ineffective) Russian aggressors have less than 1/10th of the casualties of the defending Ukrainians?
You think the Russians have turned centuries of military experience of aggressor casualties being at least 3 to 1 less than those defending?
Why are we even entertaining your delusional nonsense?
You didn't even read the article you posted you shallow, feeble-minded twat!
I let it go long enough for you to refer to the (legitimate) sources ( Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies : "Report:
Meatgrinder: Russian Tactics in the Second Year of Its Invasion of Ukraine" https://static.rusi.org/403-SR-Russian-Tactics-web-final.pdf) that were misrepresented to defend yourself. Yet all you can do is resort to liberal-left-right bias' to defend what you didn't even read!
Again, what fools are we to engage with you. I hate to admit being a bully towards someone with obvious mental health issues but you are so obnoxious that you deserve it to maybe slap yourself into seeing how far down the rabbit hole you have gone.
Last edited:
Meat grinder was report on Youtube by Colonel Ritter which he mentioned frequently which I believe. And plenty of YouTube video I watch that have a different narrative then the mainstream media garbage like CNN. Fake news,
PS. Dont read garbage from Royal United Services for defences and Security studies. I read the antiwar.com web site. don’t read anything from NATO or from American mainstream media. Only will read the interesting come out when the mainstream media force to admit the truth and walk back their lies or changed their narrative!
I never lived in Europe but my family did. Under Soviet occupation, with Russians still acting in the brutal, inhumane way they did back then, acting this way now. I had come to peace with the situation as I actually felt sympathy for the average Russian who also suffered under the oppression and tyranny of whatever version of Roosiya was being practiced back then. I even supported their integration/naturalization into becoming part of Baltic society and even citizenship.
But too many Russians continue to tolerate, support, if not just excuse their government and their genocidal actions. Even when their fellow Russian countrymen are sent off to be slaughtered in an unwinnable, war whose initial goal was to forcibly annex Ukraine. And whose (latest) goal is simply to destroy Ukraine for their insolence and to protect their leader from meeting the same fate as Khaddafi.
I still feel sympathy for those Russians (in and out of Russia) who are truly against the actions of their government but feel powerless to do anything about it. But for their own good, their government and military must be neutered so as to not be such a threat to their neighbours and to the civilized world.
And I support and admire the BRAVE citizens of Ukraine and everyone who supports them in their honourable fight for their freedom from Russian occupation.
Soviet Union don’t exist anymore! Russia is a capitalist society! Ukraine is a corrupt Nazis country nothing to be admired about end of story!! There are Russian volunteers to fight against Ukrainian Nazis that a facts! There also Russia draft dodgers no different then Vietman war USA drafted dogers who sent poor and black high schools dropouts to fight an unpopular war. nothing new here!
There is the DonBass region where Ukrainian Nazis killed and shelled Russian speaking Ukrainian also. Bottom line innocents people die on both side who don’t just want to live in peace. So far history shown anything doing with NAZI is wrong and can’t justify any crime committed by Ukrainian Nazis! Faster Zelensky Nazis regime die it better for the world.
Last edited:
So in other words, you are deliberately ignorant of anything that doesn't support your ersatz 'research' on the erudite gold standard reference that is YouTube?
As for admitting to mistakes, lies, changing their narrative... you have never ever once admitted you were anything but 100% right, all the time.
Soviet Union was just the name of the then current Russian government system. The Russian character as a nation and as a people has been consistent for the last couple hundred years, up to and including today.
The Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore because it FAILED. For the same reasons it will fail again. An outsized delusion of its greatness and military might. Before it only tried to outspend Ronald Reagan. Now it is trying to outspend all of Europe, the United States, NATO and almost every other civilized country in the world. Its only (half-assed) allies are China, Iran, Hungary, Belorussia and maybe India if they can "get a good price" on Russian black market oil.
Whatever current governance system is current in Russia has been a deeply corrupt kleptocracy who steals from their own country. You call it capitalism.
Again, you are so deeply brainwashed or are part of the Russian desinformezia brigade. Either one is a joke to thinking people.How different from Wall Street Bank steal from Main Street with their fake triple AAA mortgages back loan that caused major bank to fail like Lehman, etc… You too deluded from reality critical thinking from you with anti Russian hatred ! Borderline racism on Russian peoples!Soviet Union was just the name of the then current Russian government system. The Russian character as a nation and as a people has been consistent for the last couple hundred years, up to and including today.
Whatever current governance system is current in Russia has been a deeply corrupt kleptocracy who steals from their own country. You call it capitalism.
How different from Ukrainian government you support which ranked one of the most corrupt countries in the world !
Your research seems very one-sided then. Let's check your list.
You presented 9 examples. First off, the US's only campaigns against Serbia were during the Kosovo crisis, so that's a duplicate. Russia was also involved in Syria and Libya, so it's ridiculous to count them. One of the reasons you give for supporting Russia was the 16,000 people kiilled by Ukraine in Donbas, the majority of which were combatants and many of which were Russian military, and yet you cite Kosovo which was a response to 14,000 civilians murdered in 2 years. If you think Russia is justified because of the police action in Donbas, you can't cite Kosovo as it was a far bloodier event against pure civilians, unless you're an absolute hypocrite. You can't count Afghanistan since the Soviets did the exact same thing. Russia has their own version of the Contra with Myanmar.
So really your list is 3 ways: Iraq, Panama and Vietnam. 3 I happen to agree with. Bad America!
But why haven't you looked at the Russian list? Forget Soviet Union, straight up Russia: Transnistria, East Prigorodny, Abkhazia, Tajikistan, Chechnya, Dagestan, Chechnya again, Georgia, Ingushetia, Ukraine (Crimea) and then Ukraine again. 11 vs 3, 10 if you only want to count Ukraine once. Who's on the wrong side?
What? You literally just said he's on the right side of history, now you're saying he's not righteous and justified but have to learn to live with his evil?
You defend Putin's actions. You don't say, "He's bad but a necessary evil." No, you say, "He's there getting rid of the Nazis and saving the little of the Donbas from being killed by Ukraine." Unless you're prepared to admit that's all nonsense and the only reason you support is because of nukes and your earlier comments about being on the right side of history are nonsense, then I'm not sure what your point is here.
Which is why I've asked if you've considered that letting Russia have Ukraine increases the risk of nuclear war rather than preventing it. You're putting all your money, being the entire history of humanity, on the belief that if you let Russia have Ukraine out of fear of nuclear war, that you don't encourage the proliferation of nuclear weapons and aggressive actions by other nations with nuclear weapons. You're betting everything on an argument that's basically, "If you never stand up to a bully, they'll stop and there will be less bullies in the world."
Russia spends $65 billion on its military. The US spends $2 trillion. The US has some of the best universities in the world feeding the biggest defense contractors in the world, and is allied to every other nation renowned for their universities as well as 2 other countries that outsoend Russia on defense.
Why do you think the US doesn't have hypersonic missiles? The B-52 is ancient, slow, and has no stealth capabilities, yet it will be in service beyond any other aircraft currently in the US fleet. Why? Because it can air launch hypersonic missiles beyond the range of Russian radar and air defenses. If the US didn't have hypersonic missiles, the B-52 would already be out of service.
The US has submarines off the coast of Russia as we speak with nuclear missiles that can hit Moscow in under 6 minutes. They can nuke St Petersburg in 2. I'm not sure what "first strike" means to you, but in military strategy, the concept of "first strike" means you eliminate the enemy's ability to retaliate. So Russia does not have "first strike" abilities. In all likelihood, at best Russia would take out DC from a sub off the East Coast and any additional ordinance would be hitting the US after all major Russian cities have already been hit. That's not first strike.
In any case, if your entire support of Putin is bad on your fears of nuclear war, then you should just be honest about that and stop spreading propaganda about neonazis and other nonsense, and also realize you're just encouraging more countries to get nukes and more countries with nukes to do whatever they want. You're actively encouraging an increase in the risk of nuclear war by supporting Putin.
Then stop saying the US is on the wrong side of history and Putin is justified and admit you're just a selfish coward that's willing to let genocide happen as long you get to exercise and post with your dog, even if it only increases the risk of your children and grandchildren seeing nuclear war.
- Status
