Are you outdoing that with more than a decade of failed climate predictions?really
a decade of failure is not quite enough for butler 1000
Are you outdoing that with more than a decade of failed climate predictions?really
a decade of failure is not quite enough for butler 1000
that is almost as offensive as your ignorant / divisive and really stupid quisling commentLike I said. A strongly worded letter will fix things. Better get on it!
I mean, mostly because they did a lot of economic damage and didn't actually save any money.FYI the US democrats will soon be asking why they opposed Elon Musks DOGE efforts
they were not permitted to act as neededI mean, mostly because they did a lot of economic damage and didn't actually save any money.
By whom? Repubs control the house, senate, presidency, and supreme court. Who was preventing DOGE from "acting as needed"?they were not permitted to act as needed
the courtsBy whom? Repubs control the house, senate, presidency, and supreme court. Who was preventing DOGE from "acting as needed"?
Since when was usaid holding Elon musk to account?DOGE was always a grift to dismantle agencies who were holing Elon to account. Do you really think 19-year-old BIGBALLS was the best guy, in a country of 340 million, to audit government spending?
The courts enforce the law. So you're saying is that DOGE's actions were illegal, and you support illegal activities?the courts
the democrats blew a fuse at word go for doge
please do not pretend you are so naive not to understand how the us court system is politizedThe courts enforce the law. So you're saying is that DOGE's actions were illegal, and you support illegal activities?
I'm not arguing what is legal or illegal. I'm not a US judge.please do not pretend you are so naive not to understand how the us court system is politized
the bottom line is government waste spending has been out of control for decades and the bill is coming due
the 36 trillion debt accumulated by the us govt over its 240 year history is going to double in the next 9 years under status quo
20% of all us govt revenues are spent servicing the interest on that massive debt
the us govt is on a very slippery slope towards insolvency
a us govt insolvency will cause a world wide depression, not a recession, but a depression
doge was trying to prevent this
the loonie left fought doge tooth and nail
i am sure you will feel better when entitlement spending, social security, Medicaid, Medicare , welfare is slashed to the bone simply because there will be noone willing to buy new treasuries and thus no money will be available to payout for entitlements ,
you will argue that is illegal while ignoring the reality of empty govt coffers
Lol. MAGA get those "entitlements" more. Look at state transfers. Once they get their own benefits cut it will be fun to watch.the courts
the democrats blew a fuse at word go for doge
Since when was usaid holding Elon musk to account?
the left will freak when cuts are required for entitlement spending, social security, Medicaid, Medicare , welfare
and the left should regret not fining spending cuts elsewhere as doge was attempting to do
And the big beautiful bill adds 3 trillion. That doesn't sound very responsible.please do not pretend you are so naive not to understand how the us court system is politized
the bottom line is government waste spending has been out of control for decades and the bill is coming due
the 36 trillion debt accumulated by the us govt over its 240 year history is going to double in the next 9 years under status quo
20% of all us govt revenues are spent servicing the interest on that massive debt
the us govt is on a very slippery slope towards insolvency
a us govt insolvency will cause a world wide depression, not a recession, but a depression
doge was trying to prevent this
the loonie left fought doge tooth and nail
i am sure you will feel better when entitlement spending, social security, Medicaid, Medicare , welfare is slashed to the bone simply because there will be noone willing to buy new treasuries and thus no money will be available to payout for entitlements ,
you will argue that is illegal while ignoring the reality of empty govt coffers
Yup. That's what I've been saying. I figure he has a year.that is almost as offensive as your ignorant / divisive and really stupid quisling comment
your man Carney won the election via deceit
He won and has the job
His actions going forward will determine how long he survives
if fails to deliver , the electorate will not forget he won via deceit
bullshit your notI'm not arguing what is legal or illegal. I'm not a US judge.
So you're saying is that DOGE's actions were illegal, and you support illegal activities?
that is loonie left partisanshipIf DOGE believed what it was doing was legal, it could have fought to the supreme court, which has already made Trump a god-king.
All govt spending needs to able to withstand an auditIf DOGE's actions SHOULD have been legal, the house should have passed laws to support DOGE's work.
AI Overview
Learn more
Yes, audits of government spending in the USA are mandatory for many federal programs and organizations. While there are exceptions, the general rule is that government spending is subject to oversight, including audits, to ensure accountability and transparency.
i never claimed it wasAnd the big beautiful bill adds 3 trillion. That doesn't sound very responsible.
no he can not wait for a year]Yup. That's what I've been saying. I figure he has a year.
WRF is wrong with youAnd so long as you want to take the US side on trade negotiations by dismantling supply chain the quisling comment stands as truth. It's a national security issue to protect our food supply and farmers from foreign multinationals.
wrongDid you learn nothing during the pandemic? Look at what not having drug manufacturing did to us. Now you want to hand over FOOD?
Nelson Zandbergen
Farmers Forum
OTTAWA — Canadian dairy farmers sent more than 6.8 billion litres of surplus milk down the drain between 2012 and 2021, a rate of milk-dumping higher than the U.S. and other major dairying countries. That’s the estimation of researchers who compared the total milk production of Canada’s national dairy herd with the actual amount of milk that goes out the farm gate.
The recently published study — by Dalhousie University food professor Sylvain Charlebois and academic colleagues in Michigan and Denmark — concluded that plenty of milk “vanished” from Canadian dairy farms as producers dumped it to avoid exceeding their supply-management quotas. The quantity of wasted milk, between 6.8 billion and 10 billion litres over 10 years, would be worth $14.9 billion, fill over 2,700 Olympic-sized swimming pools and feed 4.2 million people annually.
The lost milk is equivalent to 7 % of Canada’s milk production. That exceeds the on-farm milk-dumping rate in the U.S. (up to 0.5 %), Sweden (0.3 %), Finland (0.5 %), Scotland (1.8 %) and France (3.5 %), according to the research. Canada is the only country left in the world with a supply-managed dairy sector.
Milk dumping last made a media splash in February 2023 when Southwestern Ontario dairy farmer Jerry Huigen went viral with a video of himself gushing wasted milk onto the barn floor. Dairy farmers are told “just throw it down the drain. Nobody sees it, it’s OK,” Huigen complained in the social media post. “Well, it’s not OK.”
Charlebois told Farmers Forum that the video inspired his co-authors to contact him about studying the phenomenon in Canada. Because data on discarded milk is not collected in this country, the professor and his colleagues took a year to estimate the milk losses. They estimated the annual milk output of the national herd, based on cow numbers, and then subtracted milk sales volume figures published by Statistics Canada.
I enjoy how you keep saying "tree, tree, tree." and never see the forest.bullshit your not
that is loonie left partisanship
All govt spending needs to able to withstand an audit
are audits of government spending mandatory in the usa?
you're actually laying out the grift. "Oh, we tried with DOGE and it didn't work, now we have to cut social spending"i suspect the doge savings were expected to offset the tax cuts in big beautiful bill
now the savings will need to come from entitlement spending, social security, Medicaid, Medicare , welfare
says the ostrich with his head stuck in the sandI enjoy how you keep saying "tree, tree, tree." and never see the forest.
the bottom line is government waste spending has been out of control for decades and the bill is coming due
the 36 trillion debt accumulated by the us govt over its 240 year history is going to double in the next 9 years under status quo
20% of all us govt revenues are spent servicing the interest on that massive debt
the us govt is on a very slippery slope towards insolvency
a us govt insolvency will cause a world wide depression, not a recession, but a depression
bullshit, if government spending was properly audited and controlled there would not be a 36 trillion pile of govt debtAll government spending is ALREADY audited. DOGE didn't audit, they just cut.
what part of this is beyond your comprehension?you're actually laying out the grift. "Oh, we tried with DOGE and it didn't work, now we have to cut social spending"
It was designed to fail so that MAGA cultists will bend over and thank Trump for cutting their supports.
do you not understand what insolvency means ?the 36 trillion debt accumulated by the us govt over its 240 year history is going to double in the next 9 years under status quo
20% of all us govt revenues are spent servicing the interest on that massive debt
the us govt is on a very slippery slope towards insolvency
You said in your response you didn't know the word initiate had two meanings. Your words not mine.Your original comment about the word initiate having two meanings in my response made no sense anyway.
I asked you how the word initiate in my question can be interpreted in more ways than one.
You are still not able to articulate just like you aren't able to articulate the impact of carbon taxes or do basic grade school math.
No strawman here. And I honestly don't believe you voted Conservative now and in the past. No one who has voted Conservative regularly would be so dismissive of what the Liberals have pulled.As I said. I voted Conservative this time. And the last 3 times. I never trusted or liked Trudeau. That one, especially after the refugee bullshit, WE charity shit had to go then. Once he froze bank accounts I said absolutely gone.
You just tried to strawman. Smarten up.
They didn't "pull" anything. Stop being such a baby about an election loss.No strawman here. And I honestly don't believe you voted Conservative now and in the past. No one who has voted Conservative regularly would be so dismissive of what the Liberals have pulled.
Smarten up. Your not fooling anyone.






