Crying female cop
- Thread starter Birf
- Start date
What?..LOL...They don't call for back up...When was the last time you got pulled over?
Can you imagine the waste of manpower that would be if a second unit that only had a male had to be called?
They don't call for backup if nothing goes wrong.
If something seems off or goes wrong, they do call for backup.
This is the same procedure whether it is a male or a female cop.
What is so new about this?
If something goes wrong then it's too late.
It just occurred to me that you don't drive so there's that.
Not any different with a male cop.
When something goes wrong they call for backup per standard procedure.
I don't get pulled over when I drive, so not sure what that has to do with anything.
A male high a much higher chance at handling a physical one on one confrontation than a female.
Nobody reasonable and not trolling would dispute this.
When things go sideways and they will...There is no time to call for the cavalry.
"A much higher chance" - indicates a probability - not a certainty.
Which means the reverse could also be true - a male cop could fail, where a female cop actually succeeds.
Not all confrontations go the same way either - meaning situations are unique.
Female cops are also less likely to get into confrontations because they are found to de-escalate better than male cops.
Confrontations also involve calling for back up and working as a team, which is standard procedure for both male and female cops.
A confrontation itself happens only about 1% of the time
Putting all this together, means that the conclusion that female cops should not serve, simply because they are physically not as strong as men, is not a reasonable one supported by data or common sense.
But is is different with a male cop.
He is stronger than a female cop.
He has a statically smaller chance of being hurt or killed by a criminal.
However judging by your nonsensical posts you believe women are just as strong as men.
And that strength difference has very little bearing on their performance of their everyday policing job 99% of the time.
So strength difference is not a valid reason to demand that women should not serve.
All right wing arguments always rely on outliers and edge cases that don't happen 99% of the time.
Which is why no one takes these sorts of arguments seriously.
That means you are ok with the 1% of cases that a woman is injured or killed because of her gender.
Good to know your stance on protecting women.
No, in 1% of cases policing results in violent confrontation.
So in less than 1% of cases women may get hurt more than men do, and I am completely okay with those <1% odds.
When making a decision you need to consider what happens most often.
Not what happens in less than 1% of cases.
As I said using edge cases to push a narrative weakens your argument.
Heard many times from male cops that they don't think females should be out on patrol.
It puts the public and themselves in imminent danger.
nobody mentioned the "distraction" factor yet
he should be fighting crime not fingering
Female police officer fingered by male colleague in their car...
Kaotic.com is a free video and file host depicting the reality of life around the globe. The world is a scary place !
kaotic.com
you mean like this type of de-escalation?
that women are not necessarily better than men, at de-escalation
to do that you need to provide a little bit more than just a single video. Just to be clear: i talk about "on average". There are male cops who will handle de-escalation better than female cops. Also, i don't see any de-escalation attempt on the video at all. In fact, the video shows that the woman takes an action which goes horribly wrong, mostly playing into my point.
you made a blanket statement that "on average" women cops do a better job at de-escalating than men would
I am just pointing it out
