Muslim Dad MURDERS his daughte for not wearing the Head Scarf
- Thread starter james t kirk
- Start date
Yes, I agree, we've fucked it up pretty good, so let's all leave and let the first nations people look after the continent.Keebler Elf said:
I'll bet you he gets less time than Robert Latimar(if convicted at all), and gets parole when he is first eligible for it.MYSITEONLY said:
Just when I think you've turned the page, your true ignorance always shines through.Keebler Elf said:
I agree with you as well. Maybe this should be added as well. He killed his daughter because she wanted to be a Canadian. After all this is Canada.james t kirk said:
I think if you want to come to Canada, and eventually want to become Canadian citizens then leave your retarded religious views where you came from. If not, then get the fuck out of my Canada.
I AM CANADIAN
S
superman
Here's what I can't understand:Mr. Piggy said:
Some people are desperate to get out of their own countries whether it be in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Africa or wherever, and move here.
Then through their religious beliefs, customs or tradition, they try to make things here as screwed up as in the country they left!!! Why did they bother leaving??? (Economic reasons aside)
Robert Latimer has served way more time already than he deserved.The Cunning Linguist said:
The killing of one's daughter who is just trying to fit in with her friends and not strictly adhere to her religion's dress requirements is not even on the same page as what Latimer did. Latimer acted out of compassion. The Perez guy acted out of rage and offence at his daughter's disrespect of him/his beliefs. Totally different.
A secular education system helps teach that people should not kill or persecute others in the community based on their religious beliefs or lack thereof. So I think keeping education secular and the courts secular helps a muli-cultural city like the GTA function better. Yes, there is a Catholic school system - and (as another poster mentioned) it was entrenched in the formation of Canada. The French language is here too as our second language, and while it would make more sense to have Italian as a second language in Toronto (more Italian speakers than French here currently) what's done is done and that is our history. I doubt Catholics in current day Toronto would kill their daughters for wearing an upside down crucifix, questioning their faith or wearing skirts too short. I can't think of any Catholic country where people would do that today. I know atheists who grew up Catholic and socially debate atheism with practicing Catholics as a free exchange of ideas. In some countries, other religions that are popularly held/state sanctioned cause otherwise normal people in the community to act irrationally if they feel their religion is being disrespected. The reason a lot of us are complaining is that while this sort of thing (murdering one's daughter for disrespecting your religion) doesn't happen in Toronto, there are other countries in the world where it does happen and we sure as heck don't want this to ever be even a partially accepted practice here. So we condemn it, and rightly so.shakenbake said:
Sorry dude but I have to say you are clearly showing your bias towards Muslims here. To say that Palestinians are strapping bombs to their bodies in defense of Jewish aggression is nothing but a defense of terrorism and in my opinion is unacceptable. And you are really jumping to conclusions with your comment about people's reaction if the taser victim was Muslim and not Polish.fizzyeyes said:
Wrong. It is just as clear from reading the Pickton letters as it is reading speculation from friends and neighbors of that poor girl in the media, that both people committed their murder due to some twisted reading of their respective religions and it's REAL misogynistic attitudes. Matter of fact since my evidence fror making this statement comes directly from the hand of Pickton himself, rather than through unconfirmed speculation from third parties, my statement has much more credibility.train said:
But possibly, in spite of the fact that you simply make unsupported statements, and I provide actual evidence, you might still be correct, and have just neglected to provide your compelling evidence ... so, please feel free to go ahead and explain to us the difference and present your evidence.
Just wish to speak on behalf of his boss for a second.DATYdude said:
I am not that confident that said poster completely understood his boss . I have a feeling that his boss did not actually say that .
That being said, I very much enjoyed your clarification .
Chances are his boss missed this thread anyway.
Scouser ...
.... When your buddy the King of Jordan was ''in charge'' he used our synagogues as horse stables !
Then the Israelis on that most great and wonderful day called the King and told him to not enter the war.....or else. Now he was being double crossed by his Arab brother nations who told him to attack Israel because in effect the war would be over in days !
He attacked , then the Israelis did liberate the territories !!
Its 9am , go teach something !
But Scouser old friend ....scouser1 said:
.... When your buddy the King of Jordan was ''in charge'' he used our synagogues as horse stables !
Then the Israelis on that most great and wonderful day called the King and told him to not enter the war.....or else. Now he was being double crossed by his Arab brother nations who told him to attack Israel because in effect the war would be over in days !
He attacked , then the Israelis did liberate the territories !!
Its 9am , go teach something !
