He was giving Toke a run for his money and based on Toke's attempts to insult members here at any turn if they happen to have issues with teachers - it seemed only fair to puit the two together. Red can post very well, or can give you the crap you dish. I saw it has a fair trade. You and I having a debate in a thoughtful and respectful way is different.
As others have pointed out, your numbers seem a little off. So I will wait until you find that article you were looking for. As it stands, from what others have reported in the 80-100K yearly salary, starting salaries in the 50k range, I think that teachers are over paid.
Giving a run? Sure if that is by changing the subject (my handle), calling names (racist), and naming numbers that can not be proven (80% of teachers are bad while in the past saying 1 in 10). Notice I never mention numbers? I'm not interested in attaching some big or small number to my argument to substantiate it.
Now see I disagree. I have had great experience with Principals, VP's, EA's, board facility, etc. It is those people who have given my children what I expect from teachers. I have to often go higher to get these teachers to simply do their job.
For example, 1 teacher - who has been off all week BTW and is responsible for the "study hall" class that my daughter as had all week - decided that he wanted to implement a no bag/jacket policy in his class. Making it impossible for some to get to class on time depending on which week the school is working on. {class changes from 3rd to 4th every other week} If you bring a bag or a coat, you are kicked out of his class. Not sent to put it away in your locker and then come back. Nope. Kicked out for the whole class. The room is cold, the books are heavy. He is simply doing it to be an ass. When questioned on why, he simply says, "cause it is my class. My class, my rules" Not one specific reason given.
Now I teach my daughter that sometimes, you just have to deal with arrogant assholes in life and this is one of them so learn now. His class, his rules. So follow it. I was in the school 2 weeks ago with this idiot, explaining what a coat was. A shall, a mini jacket that is indoor attire is not a outside coat. He kicked my daughter out of class for indoor attire that he said was a coat. So trip to the Principal, have him deal with it. He did. The teacher didn't like it of course and funny enough, he is now on vacation with his "sick days" Sorry but he is a loser, an idiot who doesn't even know half of what he is teaching, and walks around with a chip on shoulder.Always giving attitude, acts entitled to everything. The principal wants to fire him. Does not think he is a good fit for the school, but can't do shit about it.
2 kids straight through from JK to Grade 12 and my daughter almost finished herself, I have had to deal with over 75 teachers roughly. 80% of have been crap. Higher ranking staff, 100% have been great. Those are my stats from my experience.
Wow. So you're telling me that VPs and Principals are the ones that provide your children the education they need? I wonder if they do this for all students; have a particular liking of your kids; and/or are the best principals ever? In my experience most Principals do little in terms of actually educating (e.g. teaching/tutoring) and if they do have any effect, it is through passing the duty on to the teacher (which is what they should do).
In response to your no-bag-no-jacket policy, in most schools where lockers are available, this is a common school policy. Not only does it keep clutter down but I've seen it implemented as a safety measure to know which students belong in the building and which are 'visitors' (that's how it was explained in my high school). If the teacher does not have a better answer, and you're still concerned, either demand a better reason or have the Principal intervene. Sure he may just be a dick (especially in the indoor attire situation) but I would argue that an unreasonable adult is the minority rather than the majority. In that case, I agree with you and the principal.
Good point. Seems Toke is a great example as well. He is so biased and closed minded, he gets automatically defensive and goes on the attack. Parents are not good parents getting involved, opinions of others don't count based on his ignorant judgments and when confronted head on, he takes his ball and runs away. THIS is not what I want my children to learn.
Yes, I do usually defend teachers. Just like many here hear the words 'teacher', 'union', or 'public sector' an quickly fly into a rage.
'Take my ball and run away'. I think you're the one that excused herself to go pick up your daughter. Sure you can leave the conversation if/when you want, but stressing that you have better things to is more representative of the 'take my ball and leave' behaviour.
I disagree. Sorry. People keep saying that they "lose" the days. The days, in my opinion, are set up to assist IF a teacher is sick. Ensure that they stay home instead of passing the illness around. I don't want my teachers worrying about making rent at the end of the month. I don't want them to come in sick because they need the income. I would prefer to pay them to stay home. They are doing a public service and I agree with assisting as much as possible BUT don't fucking use me and take me for a ride and abuse my good nature. That is what is being done. THAT is what I feel is morally wrong and personally I would NOT do it. If I wasn't sick and didn't need the days, then I would feel blessed for my health. Not think of a way to scam the people I work for. THAT is just me however.
This is common in any job in which expiring paid sick days are provided. I have a friend that makes his own long-weekends in any month in which one is not already coming. Is he a teacher? Nope. Public service employee? Nope. Banker? Yes. Where is the outrage for that? If it is the rationale that it is a 'public service', it makes no difference . Employees in every field and/or in every level will always maximize the benefits of their compensation.
Not jealous at all, just don't like paying 2 people for one job. It is not needed and since it is my tax dollars that are at work here, I have a right to voice that opinion.
I had a tutor in my last year of high school. Actually took the course multiple times. Never worked out then, so taught myself the material as an adult. Sometimes people need more help and/or just don't get it.
I know many teachers as well who are great. Mine for example. My experience with elementary and high school teachers is not the same however. In my experience the bad apples far out weight the good apples in these two levels of educators.
This is why I defend teachers when 'angry parents' come here complaining. Your emotional attachment and/or more matured opinion may have skewed your view towards teachers. I know mine likely has, because I do view almost all of my teachers positively and am more critical of teachers today. However, I do know that many changes have been made in education between then and now that has changed how teachers teach and students learn. Changes for the worse in my opinion. I believe that the biggest change is the lack of respect for the teacher as a responsible adult. Whereas today the parents do not respect the teacher and criticise and question them, when I was school-aged, parents more often sided with the teacher. Perhaps the teacher who has the bag/jacket rule could be used as a learning lesson for later in life as your child may have a boss with unreasonable rules. Not telling you what to do, but that's what my father would have said to me. Hell, I've even said it to students who have come to me about a difficult teacher.
This is where you show just how truly ignorant your are. Parents "know" the teachers they deal with and you can not "know" what those experiences are yet you seem to try and insert that you do. Telling a poster here who confirmed an inclass ISU for you, that you question it simply because it did not fit with your insulting argument to her. Happens more times than not in high school now. Give a ISU because it is easier then teaching a lesson and they only have one assignment to grade instead of an additional few little one if they had actually taught on a daily basis.
As for me, you dismissed my opinions based on what again - that I am a part time escort photographer and web-designer. Yet because you are so ignorant, you have no idea that I actually teach too! Privately. Oh and I am a TA for some course as well in the college level. And yes, I still have these opinions. So if your opinion is okay based on your biased and close minded attitude of being a teacher, guess what? Mine is too. Your arrogant, ignorant opinions, coupled with your clear sense of false entitlement is exactly the type of "teacher" I and many others have issue with. Never willing to look at yourself. Always the students' fault, or the parent's fault, or the governments fault, etc etc. It is really sad to be honest.
Sorry, but ISUs are not the result of lazy teaching. They're part of the curriculum. Perhaps you should have a look at them. They're readily available online the Ministry of Education's website. While my knee-jerk reaction is to also question a history project on Justin Beiber, I can also see ways in which to defend the assignment. Perhaps it was permitted if the student had to find historical information on anyone, with the point of the assignment being more towards teaching the ability to research rather than who is being researched. He may not have far-reaching historical significance, but would you have been that much happier if she choose The Beatles or Elvis?
You say that you were insulted by me pointing out your profession? You threw the first rock by assuming I would not be a good teacher because of my responses in this thread. I just threw it back. Childish? Yes, but you took it there.
TAing in a college is much different than teaching in the lower grades. For starters, you're teaching adults (or at least people more likely to act as such). You don't have the sizes nor do you have to use the same level of classroom management, and you don't have to deal with emotionally attached parents.
Funny that you tutor privately. Unless you're a tutor at a private school, you're either doing it for free, or have no problem charging for a service you're upset about having to pay for. Kill two birds with one stone; tutor your kids.
I would have supported the F and gave my daughter shit for doing such a crap job. Accountability. I make everyone accountable for their own actions, including my children.
Great. And like another poster mentioned, if you were the grading teacher, you could expect an angry parent coming in to argue that you were too quick in handing out a bad grade. I've had parents argue bad marks on math tests.
Ya, extra help in a subject. Forget it! In elementary there is no way that will be happening, and in high school they got the peer tutor route. Just another pass off to someone to educate the kids.
Can't speak for all, but in the schools I've been in it is readily available. I've stayed as late as legally allowed many times.
I support peer tutoring. Sometimes students learn better from another student. They speak the same language and the student is sometimes less intimidated.
No it is not. It gives way to public opinion and THAT my friend is very relevant.
I guess, but part of the problem with public opinion is that it is not always based on facts.
__________________________________________________
My opinions have been clearly noted. I know some will agree, some will disagree. That is fine. It is not something that is going to change anytime soon and I am not here to change minds or have my mind changed. Really busy lately so I may not make it back into this thread.
Have a great day all.